#1  
Old 08-24-2022, 09:43 PM
Green Hornet's Avatar
Green Hornet Green Hornet is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 654
Default Too many shims....?

Was planning on using this 73 bird sub-frame.....but just realized that the shim packs are excessive on the right upper control arm...

Looks like about a 1/2" on the front.....and 3/8" on the back..

The other side looks normal with just one or two shims..

The right side frame horn doesn't look quite right so I'm guessing it may have gotten whacked at some point in time...

Any other reason...that might justify the extra shims on that side?
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	CIMG3390.JPG
Views:	201
Size:	191.9 KB
ID:	597157  

  #2  
Old 08-25-2022, 08:29 AM
dataway's Avatar
dataway dataway is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Saratoga NY
Posts: 8,942
Default

If it's a problem with the frame it could probably be tweaked enough to reduce the need for so many shims. Someone probably didn't want to go to the trouble when it was part of an assembled vehicle.

__________________
I'm World's Best Hyperbolist !!
  #3  
Old 08-25-2022, 09:09 AM
amcmike's Avatar
amcmike amcmike is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,733
Default

Other than things being out of whack, maybe they were experimenting with more negative camber and just didn't get to the other side? Or it's setup for Circle Track racing.

__________________
"The Mustang's front end is problematic... get yourself a Firebird." - Red Forman
  #4  
Old 08-25-2022, 09:58 AM
"QUICK-SILVER" "QUICK-SILVER" is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: LaFayette Georgia
Posts: 5,514
Default

Are the shims from a previous alignment with worn out a-arm bushings and ball joints?

Clay

The Following User Says Thank You to "QUICK-SILVER" For This Useful Post:
  #5  
Old 08-25-2022, 01:07 PM
Sirrotica's Avatar
Sirrotica Sirrotica is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Catawba Ohio
Posts: 7,207
Default

It all depends on whether the car was aligned previously with worn parts, when I did alignments the first thing to do it properly was to make sure the wear items were withing spec. I am aware that not all persons doing alignments check all the wear items before they do an alignment. It's pretty much a waste of time to align the front end with sloppy parts, but it does get done.

As you said collision damage may be another reason, along with the sub frame being off when it was welded together.

MOOG has problem solver parts for cars that can't be brought into spec with stock parts, so there are some cars that are either bent from collisions, or just have factory parts that are out of spec. The good news is that as long as you can get the car to spec, it will usually drive fine.


__________________
Brad Yost
1973 T/A (SOLD)
2005 GTO
1984 Grand Prix

100% Pontiacs in my driveway!!! What's in your driveway?

If you don't take some of the RACETRACK home with you, Ya got cheated

  #6  
Old 08-25-2022, 02:21 PM
Skip Fix's Avatar
Skip Fix Skip Fix is online now
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Katy,TX USA
Posts: 20,574
Default

Depends if they were trying to get a lot of camber caster out of it too. My 78 I have enough to barely have 1 thread left on the rear to get more positive caster. Frames can sag some over the years too.

__________________
Skip Fix
1978 Trans Am original owner 10.99 @ 124 pump gas 455 E heads, NO Bird ever!
1981 Black SE Trans Am stockish 6X 400ci, turbo 301 on a stand
1965 GTO 4 barrel 3 speed project
2004 GTO Pulse Red stock motor computer tune 13.43@103.4
1964 Impala SS 409/470ci 600 HP stroker project
1979 Camaro IAII Edelbrock head 500" 695 HP 10.33@132 3595lbs
  #7  
Old 08-25-2022, 04:14 PM
dataway's Avatar
dataway dataway is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Saratoga NY
Posts: 8,942
Default

Always wondered about that frame sag .... some properly applied heat to a strip on the bottom center of the engine cradle should flame shape the sag right out.

__________________
I'm World's Best Hyperbolist !!
  #8  
Old 08-25-2022, 09:30 PM
rohrt rohrt is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA
Posts: 4,126
Default

i would get a couple of Trams and printout of the dimensions and start measuring it. The shims may be normal or there may be something wrong. Is the other side the same?

  #9  
Old 08-26-2022, 10:18 PM
Green Hornet's Avatar
Green Hornet Green Hornet is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 654
Default

Ok...thanks for everbodys input....

I checked dimensions on spacing on flange where upper control arm shaft mounts to sub frame....and both front and rear compare with 2 other sub-frames I measured...so right side fat shim packs prolly were re-installed after front end was rebuilt....

Will cross measure sub frame before I continue...but am optimistic that it can be used..

  #10  
Old 08-27-2022, 07:33 PM
punkin punkin is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Northern Colorado
Posts: 295
Default

I don't mean to hijack this thread but what would be considered too many shims? I realize this is a point of leverage on the frame and the bolts that hold the control arms on. Curious what the recommended max?

__________________
1968 Firebird
IAIIa 522
340 E-heads
Northwind with XFlow TBI
4L80E
3.50:1 Rear
  #11  
Old 08-27-2022, 09:00 PM
Sirrotica's Avatar
Sirrotica Sirrotica is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Catawba Ohio
Posts: 7,207
Default

As long as I aligned cars, and owned my own front end machine, there is no max that I ever heard of.

As I already have posted, MOOG Makes problem solver parts for cars that can't be easily aligned with the stock pieces, such as offset pivot shafts for the upper control arms on GM RWD cars. Not every car is made like all the others that run down the assembly line. You may align 50 cars that come in with minimal adjustments, then you get the one that is an oddball that may give you fits. Sometimes it's due to collision damage, sometimes it just wasn't put together same as it's twins were when new.

FWIW, I've stacked shims on stock cars to get the camber on the RF to at least 2 degrees, then the front end gets pounded hard on a rough dirt track for years, no bad experiences with any of the shims or bolts on any of the cars.


__________________
Brad Yost
1973 T/A (SOLD)
2005 GTO
1984 Grand Prix

100% Pontiacs in my driveway!!! What's in your driveway?

If you don't take some of the RACETRACK home with you, Ya got cheated

The Following User Says Thank You to Sirrotica For This Useful Post:
  #12  
Old 08-28-2022, 07:44 PM
necdb3's Avatar
necdb3 necdb3 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Mt. Laurel NJ, now Melbourne, FL
Posts: 1,370
Default

A bent lower control arm would cause the need for excessive shims.

  #13  
Old 08-28-2022, 10:18 PM
roger1's Avatar
roger1 roger1 is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Posts: 777
Default

That photo looks well in the normal range to me. A lot of thread left on the bolts. I've seen shim stacked quite a bit thicker than that before. It's also normal to see one side be a lot different from the other.

__________________
'69 GTO Convertible - Acquired October 2020. An all original project car. Restomod is underway PROJECT THREAD
'83 Chevy Choo Choo SS El Camino - LT1 350/4L60e, Owned for 30 Years, completed 2nd restomod in 2018 PHOTO
2019 BMW 440ix - Twin turbo I6, 8spd auto. PHOTO
'55 Chevy Bel Air Sport Coupe - Ram Jet 350 / T56 Magnum 6spd, Restomod Completed Sept. 2012, Sold Sept. 2021 PHOTO
The Following User Says Thank You to roger1 For This Useful Post:
  #14  
Old 08-29-2022, 05:49 PM
Skip Fix's Avatar
Skip Fix Skip Fix is online now
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Katy,TX USA
Posts: 20,574
Default

"As long as I aligned cars, and owned my own front end machine, there is no max that I ever heard of."

To get some negative camber(-0.5) and all the possible positive caster I have as many as will fit and the lock nut still work on the rear stud. Even got B body 1/4" linger studs when GM still carried them

__________________
Skip Fix
1978 Trans Am original owner 10.99 @ 124 pump gas 455 E heads, NO Bird ever!
1981 Black SE Trans Am stockish 6X 400ci, turbo 301 on a stand
1965 GTO 4 barrel 3 speed project
2004 GTO Pulse Red stock motor computer tune 13.43@103.4
1964 Impala SS 409/470ci 600 HP stroker project
1979 Camaro IAII Edelbrock head 500" 695 HP 10.33@132 3595lbs
The Following User Says Thank You to Skip Fix For This Useful Post:
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:55 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017