FAQ |
Members List |
Social Groups |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#61
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
'73 T/A (clone). Low budget stock headed 8.3:1 455, 222/242 116lsa .443/.435 cam. FAST Sportsman EFI, 315rwhp/385rwtq on 87 octane. 13.12 @103.2, 1.91 60'. '67 Firebird [sold], ; 11.27 @ 119.61, 7.167 @ 96.07, with UD 280/280 (108LSA/ 109 ICL)solid cam. [1.537, 7.233 @93.61, 11.46 @ 115.4 w/ old UD 288/296 108 hydraulic cam] Feb '05 HPP, home-ported "16" D-ports, dished pistons (pump gas only), 3.42 gears, 275/60 DR's, 750DP, T2, full exhaust My webpage http://lnlpd.com/home |
#62
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
My KRE heads were setup with Crane 99893 springs. I'm running one of Dave's Cams, Comp Road paver 246/252 and Crower Solid roller lifters # 66260H-16. Lash is set around .004 or .005 cold. Have had 2 engines like this. No issues to date. 600 hp/600 t. Pushrods are 7/16" x .116 wall. Charles |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
The car is back on the street now and has about 100 miles on it. Break in oil looks like it was new at this point. I ended up going with the same Comp cam 51-433-11 and Johnson lifters. We performed the lifter bore modification as well. So far the engine runs great and is fairly quiet around the valve train. Much better than before. Oddly enough, the engine now makes enough vacuum to run the power brakes. I was using a vacuum pump before this rebuild. The shop said the cam was retarded a few degrees and they installed it at zero. I'm looking forward to my first oil change at 500 miles I'll be cutting the filter and hopefully not finding much.
|
#64
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Have you seen this option by Randy Repp (Pontiac Speedshop) ? It's a retaining plate for off the shelf OEM production roller lifters. He sells the plate and the lifters (Sealed Power - USA made). I met him at Norwalk and he walked me through the install process - I will be using on my next build. https://pontiacspeedshop.com/valvetr...-plate-system/ https://pontiacspeedshop.com/sealed-...oller-lifters/ https://forums.maxperformanceinc.com...=846858&page=3
__________________
Will Rivera '69 Firebird 400/461, 290+ E D-Ports, HR 230/236, 4l80E, 8.5 Rear, 3.55 gears '64 LeMans 400/461, #16 Heads, HR 230/236, TKO600, 9inch Rear, 3.89 gears '69 LeMans Vert, 350, #47 heads: Non-running project Last edited by grivera; 08-11-2021 at 12:52 PM. |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
solids on the hydraulic cam
Thinking of running the Crower solids on the Crower 60245 hydraulic myself. Just got my con rods from Goatzilla and now is the time. What do I need to know about before making that decision. Currently have the CamSaver hydraulics but am concerned about ticking of a lifter or two. That would drive me more crazy than the steady clatter of solids. Really do not want to start all over with cam selection. Any thoughts?
|
#66
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I'm wary of using solid lifters on a hydraulic cam. Hydraulic cams have short take-up ramps. |
#67
|
||||
|
||||
"I would contact Crower and verify that they consider that acceptable"
Just curious.... do any of the cam manufacturers advocate using solid rollers on their hyd profile cams? I realize it is a common practice (also used in my engine), but would be interesting if any manufacturers would actually say yes, go right ahead... Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
__________________
68 Firebird-- Street/Strip - 400/461 Eagle Forged Bottom End & Ross Flat top pistons. KRE 325 CFM D port, Ultradyne 263/271 @.050, .4267 lift. Crower Solid roller lifters and 1.65 stainless rockers. Quickfuel 1000 on Torker2 intake and 2" open spacer. Hedman 1.75" headers. TH400 w/brake. Ford 9" w/3.80 gears & 28x9 Hoosier pro bracket drag radial. Best ET: 1.35 60ft, 6.29 @ 107.20 mph, 9.99 @132.33 mph. 3,300 race weight |
#68
|
||||
|
||||
The fact that those roller lifters try to self-align themselves with no spring pressure on them whatsoever with the cam being slowly turned by hand doesn't really sell me. In a real world environment of half engine RPM, heavy valve springs and the inertial load of the lifter mass, their action is going to be a little different don't you think?
The fact that there are so many link bar failures tells me the rollers aren't exactly self-aligning themselves in actual operation and I think the knife edge of those flat plates is not going to last very long as the lifters attempt to rotate. Think about the way your pushrod guide plates are constructed. They are heavy gauge steel plate with wide wear surfaces (turned down lips) that are self-gusseted in the stamping process just for the pushrods that slide by.
__________________
Triple Black 1971 GTO |
#69
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Will Rivera '69 Firebird 400/461, 290+ E D-Ports, HR 230/236, 4l80E, 8.5 Rear, 3.55 gears '64 LeMans 400/461, #16 Heads, HR 230/236, TKO600, 9inch Rear, 3.89 gears '69 LeMans Vert, 350, #47 heads: Non-running project |
#70
|
||||
|
||||
I decided I would go HFT cam/lifter combination even though I bought all the parts for the dog-bone roller lifter modification. Once I can see a set-up rack some serious daily driver mileage maybe I will pull the trigger.
Not worth being the test subject in any regards especially nowadays... |
#71
|
||||
|
||||
Check the qauge of the material used on the dog bones.
__________________
Triple Black 1971 GTO |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
Good luck. Far as I'm concerned, that's a riskier move than using a roller cam.
Make sure the cam is surface-hardened. Well worth the added cost for nitriding. https://www.streetmusclemag.com/tech...iding-process/ |
#73
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Hopefully after the above there are quite a few trouble free miles ahead but life offers no guarantees either way. |
Reply |
|
|