Pontiac - Street No question too basic here!

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old 03-23-2021, 04:50 PM
Lee's Avatar
Lee Lee is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Crosby, TX (East of Houston)/Texas/USA
Posts: 2,059
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkS57 View Post
This is what I've been using lately...

https://www.amazon.com/Driven-Racing.../dp/B01M24GGLQ
I'm mainly using Driven's LS30 oil.

__________________
'73 T/A (clone). Low budget stock headed 8.3:1 455, 222/242 116lsa .443/.435 cam. FAST Sportsman EFI, 315rwhp/385rwtq on 87 octane. 13.12 @103.2, 1.91 60'.

'67 Firebird [sold], ; 11.27 @ 119.61, 7.167 @ 96.07, with UD 280/280 (108LSA/ 109 ICL)solid cam. [1.537, 7.233 @93.61, 11.46 @ 115.4 w/ old UD 288/296 108 hydraulic cam] Feb '05 HPP, home-ported "16" D-ports, dished pistons (pump gas only), 3.42 gears, 275/60 DR's, 750DP, T2, full exhaust

My webpage http://lnlpd.com/home
  #62  
Old 03-25-2021, 08:31 PM
chuckies76ta's Avatar
chuckies76ta chuckies76ta is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,102
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by whittp View Post
I may end up running the Comp 51-433-11 HR cam with the Crower 66294E lifters. This sounds like the set up you have in one of yours can you give me advise on push rods and valve spring pressure? The shop sounds like they want to go with this set up but I want to double check their work.

My KRE heads were setup with Crane 99893 springs. I'm running one of Dave's Cams, Comp Road paver 246/252 and Crower Solid roller lifters # 66260H-16. Lash is set around .004 or .005 cold. Have had 2 engines like this. No issues to date. 600 hp/600 t.
Pushrods are 7/16" x .116 wall.


Charles

  #63  
Old 08-11-2021, 11:07 AM
whittp whittp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 107
Default

The car is back on the street now and has about 100 miles on it. Break in oil looks like it was new at this point. I ended up going with the same Comp cam 51-433-11 and Johnson lifters. We performed the lifter bore modification as well. So far the engine runs great and is fairly quiet around the valve train. Much better than before. Oddly enough, the engine now makes enough vacuum to run the power brakes. I was using a vacuum pump before this rebuild. The shop said the cam was retarded a few degrees and they installed it at zero. I'm looking forward to my first oil change at 500 miles I'll be cutting the filter and hopefully not finding much.

  #64  
Old 08-11-2021, 12:17 PM
grivera's Avatar
grivera grivera is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Just south of Baltimore
Posts: 4,912
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by whittp View Post
Would I have the option of changing to flat tappet cam and lifters while keeping my same rockers and push rods? I don't have the specs in front of me right now I attached a picture maybe that'll help.
Great news you have it fixed!

Have you seen this option by Randy Repp (Pontiac Speedshop) ? It's a retaining plate for off the shelf OEM production roller lifters. He sells the plate and the lifters (Sealed Power - USA made). I met him at Norwalk and he walked me through the install process - I will be using on my next build.

https://pontiacspeedshop.com/valvetr...-plate-system/

https://pontiacspeedshop.com/sealed-...oller-lifters/

https://forums.maxperformanceinc.com...=846858&page=3

__________________
Will Rivera

'69 Firebird 400/461, 290+ E D-Ports, HR 230/236, 4l80E, 8.5 Rear, 3.55 gears
'64 LeMans 400/461, #16 Heads, HR 230/236, TKO600, 9inch Rear, 3.89 gears
'69 LeMans Vert, 350, #47 heads: Non-running project

Last edited by grivera; 08-11-2021 at 12:52 PM.
  #65  
Old 08-12-2021, 07:19 PM
taktikian taktikian is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 98
Talking solids on the hydraulic cam

Thinking of running the Crower solids on the Crower 60245 hydraulic myself. Just got my con rods from Goatzilla and now is the time. What do I need to know about before making that decision. Currently have the CamSaver hydraulics but am concerned about ticking of a lifter or two. That would drive me more crazy than the steady clatter of solids. Really do not want to start all over with cam selection. Any thoughts?

  #66  
Old 08-12-2021, 08:03 PM
Schurkey Schurkey is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: The Seasonally Frozen Wastelands
Posts: 5,902
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by taktikian View Post
Thinking of running the Crower solids on the Crower 60245 hydraulic myself.
I would contact Crower and verify that they consider that acceptable.

I'm wary of using solid lifters on a hydraulic cam. Hydraulic cams have short take-up ramps.

  #67  
Old 08-13-2021, 12:13 AM
leeklm's Avatar
leeklm leeklm is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Mpls, MN
Posts: 1,747
Default

"I would contact Crower and verify that they consider that acceptable"

Just curious.... do any of the cam manufacturers advocate using solid rollers on their hyd profile cams?

I realize it is a common practice (also used in my engine), but would be interesting if any manufacturers would actually say yes, go right ahead...

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

__________________
68 Firebird-- Street/Strip - 400/461 Eagle Forged Bottom End & Ross Flat top pistons. KRE 325 CFM D port, Ultradyne 263/271 @.050, .4267 lift. Crower Solid roller lifters and 1.65 stainless rockers. Quickfuel 1000 on Torker2 intake and 2" open spacer. Hedman 1.75" headers. TH400 w/brake. Ford 9" w/3.80 gears & 28x9 Hoosier pro bracket drag radial. Best ET: 1.35 60ft, 6.29 @ 107.20 mph, 9.99 @132.33 mph. 3,300 race weight
  #68  
Old 08-13-2021, 01:28 AM
NeighborsComplaint's Avatar
NeighborsComplaint NeighborsComplaint is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Elgin
Posts: 2,469
Default

The fact that those roller lifters try to self-align themselves with no spring pressure on them whatsoever with the cam being slowly turned by hand doesn't really sell me. In a real world environment of half engine RPM, heavy valve springs and the inertial load of the lifter mass, their action is going to be a little different don't you think?

The fact that there are so many link bar failures tells me the rollers aren't exactly self-aligning themselves in actual operation and I think the knife edge of those flat plates is not going to last very long as the lifters attempt to rotate. Think about the way your pushrod guide plates are constructed. They are heavy gauge steel plate with wide wear surfaces (turned down lips) that are self-gusseted in the stamping process just for the pushrods that slide by.

__________________
Triple Black 1971 GTO
  #69  
Old 08-13-2021, 09:30 AM
grivera's Avatar
grivera grivera is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Just south of Baltimore
Posts: 4,912
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NeighborsComplaint View Post
The fact that those roller lifters try to self-align themselves with no spring pressure on them whatsoever with the cam being slowly turned by hand doesn't really sell me. In a real world environment of half engine RPM, heavy valve springs and the inertial load of the lifter mass, their action is going to be a little different don't you think?

The fact that there are so many link bar failures tells me the rollers aren't exactly self-aligning themselves in actual operation and I think the knife edge of those flat plates is not going to last very long as the lifters attempt to rotate. Think about the way your pushrod guide plates are constructed. They are heavy gauge steel plate with wide wear surfaces (turned down lips) that are self-gusseted in the stamping process just for the pushrods that slide by.
Isn’t a dog-bone system similar in principle and already in service by other manufacturers?

__________________
Will Rivera

'69 Firebird 400/461, 290+ E D-Ports, HR 230/236, 4l80E, 8.5 Rear, 3.55 gears
'64 LeMans 400/461, #16 Heads, HR 230/236, TKO600, 9inch Rear, 3.89 gears
'69 LeMans Vert, 350, #47 heads: Non-running project
  #70  
Old 08-13-2021, 06:40 PM
P@blo's Avatar
P@blo P@blo is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Manitoba
Posts: 1,522
Default

I decided I would go HFT cam/lifter combination even though I bought all the parts for the dog-bone roller lifter modification. Once I can see a set-up rack some serious daily driver mileage maybe I will pull the trigger.

Not worth being the test subject in any regards especially nowadays...

  #71  
Old 08-13-2021, 10:34 PM
NeighborsComplaint's Avatar
NeighborsComplaint NeighborsComplaint is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Elgin
Posts: 2,469
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by grivera View Post
Isn’t a dog-bone system similar in principle and already in service by other manufacturers?
Check the qauge of the material used on the dog bones.

__________________
Triple Black 1971 GTO
  #72  
Old 08-14-2021, 12:57 PM
Schurkey Schurkey is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: The Seasonally Frozen Wastelands
Posts: 5,902
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by P@blo View Post
I decided I would go HFT cam/lifter combination
Good luck. Far as I'm concerned, that's a riskier move than using a roller cam.

Make sure the cam is surface-hardened. Well worth the added cost for nitriding.

https://www.streetmusclemag.com/tech...iding-process/

  #73  
Old 08-14-2021, 10:24 PM
P@blo's Avatar
P@blo P@blo is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Manitoba
Posts: 1,522
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Schurkey View Post
Good luck. Far as I'm concerned, that's a riskier move than using a roller cam.

Make sure the cam is surface-hardened. Well worth the added cost for nitriding.

https://www.streetmusclemag.com/tech...iding-process/
Thanks for posting the nitriding link Schurkey. Because of my location I will probably just remove my inner springs, use low ratio rockers, specific oil, and Rhoads lifters with the additional cam lobe oiling option. If I lose a lobe I will be able to tell early by verifying push-rod rotation with a roller not so much.

Hopefully after the above there are quite a few trouble free miles ahead but life offers no guarantees either way.

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:33 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017