#1  
Old 03-25-2022, 07:54 PM
ta-kid ta-kid is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: British Columbia Canada
Posts: 350
Default Global West Front springs S-8

Looking for feed back on Global West front springs P/N S-8 which supposedly lower about 1 inch on 2nd gen firebirds.Any one installed these and what was the final result.Did they lower 1 inch or did they require a coil cut ??Ride quality etc....

  #2  
Old 03-30-2022, 11:57 AM
67Fbird's Avatar
67Fbird 67Fbird is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: GA
Posts: 465
Default

springs are ALWAYS a guessing game. Save you $100 ...moog 5658 ..trim 1/2 coil off. (the end NOT marked in white)

  #3  
Old 03-30-2022, 12:17 PM
JLMounce JLMounce is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Greeley, Colorado
Posts: 3,710
Send a message via AIM to JLMounce
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ta-kid View Post
Looking for feed back on Global West front springs P/N S-8 which supposedly lower about 1 inch on 2nd gen firebirds.Any one installed these and what was the final result.Did they lower 1 inch or did they require a coil cut ??Ride quality etc....
Quote:
Originally Posted by 67Fbird View Post
springs are ALWAYS a guessing game. Save you $100 ...moog 5658 ..trim 1/2 coil off. (the end NOT marked in white)
Yup, a 1 inch lowering spring has the possibility to actually raise the vehicle depending on the condition of the original springs.

It's a guessing game based on the age and condition of the vehicle.

It's my opinion that these cars are heavily undersprung to begin with, so I like going with a good aftermarket spring in a rate around 500 lb/in., paired with a good shock. Ride quality is still quite good and handling is improved.

Global West makes good products, I wouldn't hesitate to buy from them. You may need to cut the spring if ride height doesn't land where you want it.

I also like these springs from SPC https://www.spcalignment.com/compone...tion&pid=94394

These are a 1.3" lowering option.

__________________
-Jason
1969 Pontiac Firebird
  #4  
Old 03-30-2022, 07:16 PM
ta-kid ta-kid is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: British Columbia Canada
Posts: 350
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JLMounce View Post
Yup, a 1 inch lowering spring has the possibility to actually raise the vehicle depending on the condition of the original springs.

It's a guessing game based on the age and condition of the vehicle.

It's my opinion that these cars are heavily undersprung to begin with, so I like going with a good aftermarket spring in a rate around 500 lb/in., paired with a good shock. Ride quality is still quite good and handling is improved.

Global West makes good products, I wouldn't hesitate to buy from them. You may need to cut the spring if ride height doesn't land where you want it.

I also like these springs from SPC https://www.spcalignment.com/compone...tion&pid=94394

These are a 1.3" lowering option.
Yea I kind of figured they may not lower at all because old ones may of sagged already.Was thinking of cutting before install because its such a pain to do twice.

  #5  
Old 03-31-2022, 03:51 PM
Skip Fix's Avatar
Skip Fix Skip Fix is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Katy,TX USA
Posts: 20,574
Default

Springs are a crap shoot. So I'll even throw this out to you -put my Guldstand springs i had on the 78 back in place of the 6 cylinder drag springs. Back 20 years ago had iron heads and AC now E heads and no AC compressor or condensor. Take a look. Looked like they are almost on the bump stops! Here is the car with the S-10 5662 springs-stiffer and shorter.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0316.jpg
Views:	155
Size:	62.8 KB
ID:	587638   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0322.jpg
Views:	139
Size:	49.7 KB
ID:	587639  

__________________
Skip Fix
1978 Trans Am original owner 10.99 @ 124 pump gas 455 E heads, NO Bird ever!
1981 Black SE Trans Am stockish 6X 400ci, turbo 301 on a stand
1965 GTO 4 barrel 3 speed project
2004 GTO Pulse Red stock motor computer tune 13.43@103.4
1964 Impala SS 409/470ci 600 HP stroker project
1979 Camaro IAII Edelbrock head 500" 695 HP 10.33@132 3595lbs
  #6  
Old 03-31-2022, 03:57 PM
JLMounce JLMounce is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Greeley, Colorado
Posts: 3,710
Send a message via AIM to JLMounce
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ta-kid View Post
Yea I kind of figured they may not lower at all because old ones may of sagged already.Was thinking of cutting before install because its such a pain to do twice.
Never cut first. If you cut first and you're too low, you paid for a paper weight.

I know nobody wants to mess with taking springs in and out, but once you get your rhythm it's not hard and it doesn't take long.

I just replaced shocks in my bird and added a height adjusting shim to my SPC arms, as well as cleaning up the rotors and adding new calipers. Total time of about an hour each side.

Put the springs in, roll the car forward and backwards and bounce it a couple times to get it set right and see how it looks. Not low enough? Drive it for a week and see if it settles more. Next weekend, if it's still not low enough, then get out the cutoff wheel. Do a 1/4 coil at a time. Remember there's a near 2:1 motion ratio on the front end. If you remove an inch of height from the spring, you'll drop the car almost 2". So be sparing with the cutoff wheel.

__________________
-Jason
1969 Pontiac Firebird
  #7  
Old 03-31-2022, 04:50 PM
Skip Fix's Avatar
Skip Fix Skip Fix is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Katy,TX USA
Posts: 20,574
Default

One of those tools that looks like a giant coupling nut and bolt that goes between the ball joints works great for popping them off and on. Luckily mine or so short now I don't need a compressor!

__________________
Skip Fix
1978 Trans Am original owner 10.99 @ 124 pump gas 455 E heads, NO Bird ever!
1981 Black SE Trans Am stockish 6X 400ci, turbo 301 on a stand
1965 GTO 4 barrel 3 speed project
2004 GTO Pulse Red stock motor computer tune 13.43@103.4
1964 Impala SS 409/470ci 600 HP stroker project
1979 Camaro IAII Edelbrock head 500" 695 HP 10.33@132 3595lbs
  #8  
Old 04-03-2022, 11:50 AM
Formula8's Avatar
Formula8 Formula8 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,308
Default

^^what he said^^

Good news is once you get into an aftermarket "lowering spring" it is short enough that getting them in and out of the car won't require a compressor. I still use a chain in case something happens but my springs have been out maybe 5-6 times now as the front weight has been changed and I have had a few different tire diameters. If I had it all over to do again, I would have just invested in a set of coil overs and been done with it.

__________________
71 Formula 433, Splayed cap 400 block, 4" stroke Scat forged crank, 6.8 Eagle rods, custom Autotec pistons. SD 295 KRE D ports, Old faithful hybrid roller, Torker II, Holley Sniper Stealth, Tribal Tubes, TKO 600, 3.73 Eaton posi.
  #9  
Old 04-03-2022, 12:01 PM
Scarebird's Avatar
Scarebird Scarebird is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: ABQ, USA
Posts: 5,017
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JLMounce View Post
...It's my opinion that these cars are heavily undersprung to begin with, so I like going with a good aftermarket spring in a rate around 500 lb/in., paired with a good shock. Ride quality is still quite good and handling is improved...
I disagree.

I ran the softest F spring I could find (3.8L non AC) and it still was too harsh.

Moroso Drag springs of 275 pound rate and half a coil cut worked perfect. This with a LS3 and A6 compressor - car weight 3,350.

I ran this on a road track and it worked superb. Very rarely bottom out (front spoiler still attached) on the street even with hard driving.

  #10  
Old 04-05-2022, 08:49 AM
RocktimusPryme's Avatar
RocktimusPryme RocktimusPryme is online now
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Bedford, IN
Posts: 2,176
Default

Just another option, I just used Ridetechs new dual rate spring in my Firebird. Small sample size but so far I like them. They lowered the car a little more than 1.5" from the stock replacement type spring I had in it. They seem to function as advertised. I cant feel any difference from the old stock type spring to the new spring in ride quality, but the dual rate function has so far kept me from rubbing on any bumps or hard corners.

__________________
1967 Firebird 462 580hp/590ftlbs
1962 Pontiac Catalina Safari Swapped in Turd of an Olds 455
Owner/Creator Catfish Motorsports
https://www.youtube.com/@CatfishMotorsports
The Following User Says Thank You to RocktimusPryme For This Useful Post:
  #11  
Old 04-07-2022, 04:48 PM
Skip Fix's Avatar
Skip Fix Skip Fix is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Katy,TX USA
Posts: 20,574
Default

I can tell you when my TA was fairly new I went to Texas World Speedways and the road race course. At 130+(all the rpm my 180 HP 400 would pull with 2.56 gears) the ride with my stock springs felt as soft as Grandma's Cadillac! A 500lb spring (my Guldstrand's) were perfect for autocrossing with roadrace slicks.

__________________
Skip Fix
1978 Trans Am original owner 10.99 @ 124 pump gas 455 E heads, NO Bird ever!
1981 Black SE Trans Am stockish 6X 400ci, turbo 301 on a stand
1965 GTO 4 barrel 3 speed project
2004 GTO Pulse Red stock motor computer tune 13.43@103.4
1964 Impala SS 409/470ci 600 HP stroker project
1979 Camaro IAII Edelbrock head 500" 695 HP 10.33@132 3595lbs
  #12  
Old 04-08-2022, 02:20 PM
HWYSTR455's Avatar
HWYSTR455 HWYSTR455 is online now
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Manassas, VA
Posts: 14,719
Default

Since I have a 70-73 car, the added weight up front makes requirements more than the 74-81 cars, so grain of salt with my comments.

Another factor is bushings, OE bushings will work better with OE spring rates. If you have a free articulating suspension, you need to make up some by going to a higher rate spring.

If you have front structure braces, you probably will need a touch more spring than without them, or at least that's what I've found to be true.

My car is pretty low too, in those situations, you do need a little more spring.

I had GW 650s on it and it was about perfect. It still in extreme conditions would bottom on the stops, using Koni's. I was going to go to a Procharger setup, and knew the added weight would need to be compensated, so I put 725s in it.

Haven't driven with the 725s yet, but I did bail on the Procharger setup. Will have a serp belt setup on it, hoping the weight addition from that is comparable to a Procharger's. Will see.

I will have better shocks on it this time around, and will have to do some weight jacking to dial it in, but hoping to get the car back from paint jail this Aug to finish it.

.

__________________
.

1970 GTO Judge Tribute Pro-Tour Project 535 IA2
http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...d.php?t=760624
1971 Trans Am 463, 315cfm E-head Sniper XFlow EFI, TKO600 extreme, 9", GW suspension, Baer brakes, pro tour car
https://forums.maxperformanceinc.com...ght=procharger
Theme Song: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zKAS...ature=youtu.be
  #13  
Old 04-22-2022, 10:06 PM
ta-kid ta-kid is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: British Columbia Canada
Posts: 350
Default

Well I have the front springs installed and they lowered the front by Inch and a half which surprised me.I figured at best 1 inch but it is what it is.So I also installed the 1 inch lowering blocks I had laying around in the rear so now the rear is only an inch higher then the front.Seems to ride ok but I did notice the bottom control arm bump stops are really close to the frame now but did not seem to affect ride when i TOOK IT FOR A RIDE OVER SOME ROLLIE POLLIE ROADS.Just wondering if I should cut a 1/2 inch off the rubbere bump stops for some clearance?
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1265.jpg
Views:	110
Size:	151.6 KB
ID:	589216  

  #14  
Old 04-23-2022, 10:04 AM
78w72 78w72 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: iowa
Posts: 4,717
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ta-kid View Post
Well I have the front springs installed and they lowered the front by Inch and a half which surprised me.I figured at best 1 inch but it is what it is.So I also installed the 1 inch lowering blocks I had laying around in the rear so now the rear is only an inch higher then the front.Seems to ride ok but I did notice the bottom control arm bump stops are really close to the frame now but did not seem to affect ride when i TOOK IT FOR A RIDE OVER SOME ROLLIE POLLIE ROADS.Just wondering if I should cut a 1/2 inch off the rubbere bump stops for some clearance?
stance looks good. i lowered my cars also, its common to cut some off the factory bump stops for a little added clearance, or they make shorter ones in poly.

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:06 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017