Performance Parts For Sale/Wanted Just Performance, non-stock, trailers, tools and related accessories here.

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-13-2022, 05:33 PM
Adecco Adecco is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: River Grove Illinois
Posts: 438
Default Pontiac 389 SD

I might be putting this into the market a rare 63 389 SD 4 bolt main motor, many say more rare than a 421SD because nascar used these motors.. gauging interest and price from the group..
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	AE4AB077-EFA8-4BD7-B08A-2BD5B5A6AD2E.jpg
Views:	341
Size:	90.1 KB
ID:	584081   Click image for larger version

Name:	87DC204F-A640-428D-9F55-25B379CEF0B1.jpg
Views:	340
Size:	93.3 KB
ID:	584082  

  #2  
Old 02-13-2022, 08:17 PM
tom s tom s is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: long beach ca usa
Posts: 18,794
Default

What heads,that intake was never a SD part,it was a M/T over the counter piece.Besides the block the amount of correct SD parts on the block can make a huge diff.Balancer,distributor intake and carb are worth more than the block.Tom

  #3  
Old 02-14-2022, 01:13 AM
Jack Gifford's Avatar
Jack Gifford Jack Gifford is offline
formerly 'Pontiac Jack'
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Phelps, NY 14532
Posts: 10,181
Default

Original crank is valuable.

__________________
Anybody else on this planet campaign a M/T hemi Pontiac for eleven seasons?
... or has built a record breaking DOHC hemi four cylinder Pontiac?
... or has driven a couple laps of Nuerburgring with Tri-Power Pontiac power?(back in 1967)
  #4  
Old 02-14-2022, 08:15 AM
Stuart's Avatar
Stuart Stuart is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 7,938
Default

Was there a 389SD in 1963? Pete McCarthy's book only shows them for 1960-1962. There was also the 425A Trophy motors in 1960-1962 that weren't technically SD blocks; while they had four bolt mains they didn't have the chamfers at the top of the cylinders.

  #5  
Old 02-14-2022, 09:32 AM
Adecco Adecco is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: River Grove Illinois
Posts: 438
Default

It is a 62 block, has the original crank, distributor, pullies, balancer, and rods, a good friend of mine whom built this motor and knows Pontiacs (Ron Rocchi ) informed me that it was a 62 389SD block, yes the heads are missing as is the original intake. The factor Cast Iron Headers are easier to run than the aluminum ones... Tom


Last edited by Adecco; 02-14-2022 at 09:41 AM.
  #6  
Old 02-14-2022, 11:11 AM
61-63's Avatar
61-63 61-63 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Sour Lake, Texas
Posts: 2,394
Default

538177 heads are std '61/'62 heads value ?? $500 rebuilt. If they have "x" and "o" stamped on the center exhaust bosses they are 425a heads so worth more mebby $1000. I recognize the carbs as 3705 Mopar AFB crossram carbs so worth $750 minimum. If the distributor and balancer are indeed sd components they are worth $500 distributor and $1500-2000 balancer. Cast iron sd exhaust manifolds now days worth $3 grand imo. 4 bolt main 425a block worth $1000 bare if a real 389sd block dk value I've never seen one not in a car. Nice engine I have no idea what it is worth together like that I would start at $10,000 probably.
As Tom said and Adecco acknowledged the intake is wrong a real 389sd would have had the 540510 aluminum tripower intake on it.

  #7  
Old 02-14-2022, 12:08 PM
Adecco Adecco is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: River Grove Illinois
Posts: 438
Default

Thanks for your numbers...

  #8  
Old 02-14-2022, 02:43 PM
tom s tom s is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: long beach ca usa
Posts: 18,794
Default

I have to go back and look,I think the 389 SD cars actually had a single 4 intake.Tripower was not a option IN a SD car.They were aftermarket for the 61 SD over the counter engines.Tom

  #9  
Old 02-14-2022, 10:30 PM
JJDeville JJDeville is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Posts: 31
Default

I had a tripower intake years ago that a guy gave me. The part number came back to be a 1960 Super Duty intake according to Pete’s book. The best I could ever find out was it was part of some over the counter parts offered by Pontiac. The only difference between the SD intake and the regular production tripower intake was the SD had no heat riser. I carried it to a lot of swap meets and finally traded it for something. There was zero interest in it back then,probably 25 years ago.

  #10  
Old 02-15-2022, 12:06 PM
Stuart's Avatar
Stuart Stuart is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 7,938
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tom s View Post
I have to go back and look,I think the 389 SD cars actually had a single 4 intake.Tripower was not a option IN a SD car.They were aftermarket for the 61 SD over the counter engines.Tom
My 1961 parts book has numbers for a single 4 bbl and a tripower intake to fit the SD heads.

  #11  
Old 02-15-2022, 06:56 PM
tom s tom s is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: long beach ca usa
Posts: 18,794
Default

1962 389SD engines were 12B and 12T,all were single 4 engines with 3444S NASCAR 4 bbls.I could only find 7 SD cars built with that engine codeIs there any code on this block?.Tom

  #12  
Old 02-16-2022, 02:01 AM
Jack Gifford's Avatar
Jack Gifford Jack Gifford is offline
formerly 'Pontiac Jack'
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Phelps, NY 14532
Posts: 10,181
Default

I hold the unpopular belief that prior to 1962 Pontiac never used the term "Super Duty" or "SD" (if anyone has literature from '61 that says otherwise, please speak up). Up through '61 PMD referred to all racing-intended parts as "Heavy Duty"- McKellar cams, etc. One reason I know this is that it was summer of '61 when I bought my aluminum Tri-Power.
Thus... I have trouble discussing any so-called 1961 Super Duty engine. Is there any evidence that Pontiac ever sold to the public a complete 389 with all of the 1961 Heavy Duty parts?

__________________
Anybody else on this planet campaign a M/T hemi Pontiac for eleven seasons?
... or has built a record breaking DOHC hemi four cylinder Pontiac?
... or has driven a couple laps of Nuerburgring with Tri-Power Pontiac power?(back in 1967)
  #13  
Old 02-16-2022, 07:02 AM
PAUL K's Avatar
PAUL K PAUL K is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sugar Grove IL USA
Posts: 6,351
Default

Isn't this post in the wrong section? Seems to be a lot of good information.. Other folks might be able to contribute to the conversation if it were else where.

If it is in the correct spot please list a price per forum rules.

__________________
Go fast, see Elvis!
www.facebook.com/PaulKnippensMuscleMotors
  #14  
Old 02-16-2022, 09:33 AM
Adecco Adecco is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: River Grove Illinois
Posts: 438
Default

this is what I have according to Wallace Racing

1962, 389 4-speed, 385 HP engine code-12T, Manual 11.00-CR, cam-596, head-540306/544127, carb-1-4 3444S, (389 SD 4-bolt main)

  #15  
Old 02-16-2022, 10:49 AM
tom s tom s is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: long beach ca usa
Posts: 18,794
Default

Jack,I know in 61-62 there was a HD balancer and a SD balancer.The only diff I could ever see was the depth of the groove?In 63 they put a retaining ring on the SD that was bolted to the front incase it came apart.Tom

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:24 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017