Pontiac - Boost Turbo, supercharged, Nitrous, EFI & other Power Adders discussed here.

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-12-2009, 06:58 PM
v869tr6's Avatar
v869tr6 v869tr6 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,128
Default Turbo + nitrous

My blowthru carb works great up to about 18 PSI but after that I think my single 0.150" needle and seats can't keep up. Don't want to send the money for dual needles and seat bowls since I plan to step up to EFI fairly soon. Would adding a 125HP shot of nitrous cause lots of trouble? I already have the nitrous kit. Anybody ever just plumb a fuel line into a carb bowl with a orifice and add fuel only under boost?

  #2  
Old 12-12-2009, 07:24 PM
Tom Vaught's Avatar
Tom Vaught Tom Vaught is offline
Boost Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The United States of America
Posts: 31,303
Default

Several people have used just the fuel side of a NOS plate to get by the fuel issue on the single Needle and seat per bowl blow thru carbs.

Plates are cheap at swap meets.

Only issue with NOS fuel plates is making sure the fuel soleniod works

Tom Vaught

__________________
"Engineers do stuff for reasons" Tom Vaught

Despite small distractions, there are those who will go Forward, Learning, Sharing Knowledge, Doing what they can to help others move forward.
  #3  
Old 12-13-2009, 02:23 PM
taff2's Avatar
taff2 taff2 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: South Wales in UK.
Posts: 2,172
Default

V869, I have seen a few setups with fuel lines plumbed through NOS fuel solenoids and restrictors into the float bowls. The solenoids were activated by an adjustable boost pressue switch(Hobbs).

  #4  
Old 12-14-2009, 02:13 AM
v869tr6's Avatar
v869tr6 v869tr6 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,128
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by taff2 View Post
V869, I have seen a few setups with fuel lines plumbed through NOS fuel solenoids and restrictors into the float bowls. The solenoids were activated by an adjustable boost pressue switch(Hobbs).
Thanks Taff, thats one of the things I was thinking about doing. Do you know where in the bowl they added the line? AN -4 or a steel line?

  #5  
Old 12-14-2009, 04:39 PM
taff2's Avatar
taff2 taff2 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: South Wales in UK.
Posts: 2,172
Default

V869, both setups used -4 braided line, both fed fuel into the bowl opposite to the normal feed inlet, but one fed the fuel into the bowl near the top, the other fed fuel in near the bottom-below the fuel level- I assume to prevent aeration or frothing. TomV would probably know which way is best.
If I remember right ,a .100" restriction was used.

  #6  
Old 12-14-2009, 07:04 PM
62fatcat 62fatcat is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: noblesville, in 46060
Posts: 401
Default

i did thid at one time it helped, but it was a bandaid.
if it were me i would use the plate instead, you have a lot more to tune with.
with the bowl injection you run the rick of overflowing the bowls, and that could get ugly real fast.
you may also try to rase your base fuel pressure this can make it richer with the same jet or try small vent tube extensions(about 2-3"long), they will allow you to run smaller jets, therefore decreasing the fuel suply demands.
good luck with your combo,

brad spidel

  #7  
Old 12-14-2009, 07:23 PM
Tom Vaught's Avatar
Tom Vaught Tom Vaught is offline
Boost Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The United States of America
Posts: 31,303
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 62fatcat View Post
i did thid at one time it helped, but it was a bandaid.

If it were me i would use the plate instead, you have a lot more to tune with.
With the bowl injection you run the rick of overflowing the bowls, and that could get ugly real fast. Brad Spidel
That is why I recommended the plate also Brad. Too easy to overflow the bowls and have a backfire/ fire with the bowl deal.

He may already be using the vent tubes, I am not sure on that deal. If not presently using them, they will definitely move more fuel through the same jetting.

Tom Vaught

__________________
"Engineers do stuff for reasons" Tom Vaught

Despite small distractions, there are those who will go Forward, Learning, Sharing Knowledge, Doing what they can to help others move forward.
  #8  
Old 12-14-2009, 10:40 PM
v869tr6's Avatar
v869tr6 v869tr6 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,128
Default

What I think is happening to my car is the bowls are getting emptied out at the end of the 1/4 when the boost gets turned up. I have 2950 lbs. going 150 mph with no trouble but turning up the boost to go faster is when the pistons melted. My carb has 0.150" needles.
My a/f is in the 11's and when I spray water/meth it go's into the 10's on a/f, but I don't know what the a/f is down track because I don't want to be looking around.
Timing is at 19 degrees total.

  #9  
Old 12-14-2009, 10:53 PM
62fatcat 62fatcat is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: noblesville, in 46060
Posts: 401
Default

you need to be able to log the a/f with the rpm to know for sure.
some guys video the guages as they go down the track.
i learned this from "chicken hawk"

  #10  
Old 12-14-2009, 10:59 PM
BruceWilkie BruceWilkie is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 9,132
Default

Has anyone considered adding an extra pair of fuel bowls? (or just one)

Seems you could close off the open sides of a pair of bowls(and floats) with a plate(or just bolt a pair together) and simply plumb each one to the existing bowls with a line to the bottom for fuel and a line at the top for venting. It would be important to mount them at same level as the existing bowls. That would give you 4 needles pretty easy. This gives extra capacity as well. It may look different but should work ok. It also offers the opportunity to add more vent tubes under the bonnet. Sure less expensive than converting to EFI or custom dual needle bowls. Certainly more trustworthy IMO than fuel solenoids.

I would try using long studs with nuts vs bowl screws. Adjust bowl levels at the sight plugs closest to the carb.

IMO draw thru systems or EFI seem far less difficult to dial in. I'm not a big fan of blow-thru. A draw-thru carb setup functions pretty much like a regular carb. Gives great atomization and fuel distribution and can still be intercooled(if properly designed) too. The turbo compressor needs to be properly sealed is the biggest requirement there. Multi-port EFI is great but still costly.


Last edited by BruceWilkie; 12-14-2009 at 11:20 PM.
  #11  
Old 12-15-2009, 12:23 AM
wrench's Avatar
wrench wrench is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sterling, CT
Posts: 558
Default

Here is a link to something a Friend of mine came up with. He runs a Local shop and specializes in boost. He is a very smart person.


http://www.sd-concepts.com/documents/Fuel%20Tool.pdf

  #12  
Old 12-15-2009, 12:54 AM
turbo69bird's Avatar
turbo69bird turbo69bird is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,425
Default

What are you jetted at?
I am sure you thought of this but you may have maxed out your metering blocks and are now using the blocks as the jets?

a standard metering block is usually all done at a 98 Jet size with out openening it up or switching to a alky metering block.

I ran 1.20 needle and seats in my car up to 145 MPH I was running 98 jets squared.

Thats when I stepped up to the fuel inejction

__________________
Happiness is just a turbocharger away!
960 HP @ 11 psi, 9.70 at 146.
Iron heads, iron stock 2 bolt block , stock crank, 9 years haven't even changed a spark plug!
selling turbos and turbo related parts since 2005!
  #13  
Old 12-15-2009, 02:11 PM
BruceWilkie BruceWilkie is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 9,132
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by turbo69bird View Post
What are you jetted at?
I am sure you thought of this but you may have maxed out your metering blocks and are now using the blocks as the jets?

a standard metering block is usually all done at a 98 Jet size with out openening it up or switching to a alky metering block.

I ran 1.20 needle and seats in my car up to 145 MPH I was running 98 jets squared.

Thats when I stepped up to the fuel inejction
Excellent point on the metering blocks. I suppose the fuel passage in the boosters could eventually become a restriction at some point as well. He could also opt for dual quads.

  #14  
Old 12-15-2009, 05:31 PM
taff2's Avatar
taff2 taff2 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: South Wales in UK.
Posts: 2,172
Default

Bruce I made up a set of bowls exactly as you've described a while back and posted pics on the turboforums, this is when the fuel solenoid deal was described to me. I never gave it much thought about the possibility of the solenoids sticking and flooding the bowls,as I didn't intend using the idea.
One reason I've gone for dual carbs is because I will have 4 float bowls for fuel supply.

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:45 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017