Pontiac - Street No question too basic here!

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #81  
Old 06-07-2016, 06:14 PM
pontibeast's Avatar
pontibeast pontibeast is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Blue Ridge Mountains, VA
Posts: 653
Default

My 455 is in the final stages of installation and I went with the Crower Hippo solid rollers to go with the Stump Puller cam as many people on here have said they had good luck with them. Now I am going to be losing sleep after reading this thread. I guess all I can do is keep checking the lifters and listen for a change in lifter noise. Does having a tight lash of about .0004 cold hurt or help with this issue? It's about 9.7 SCR with ported 6X-8 heads if that makes a difference.

  #82  
Old 06-07-2016, 06:34 PM
wheneaglesfly wheneaglesfly is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Chicago IL
Posts: 644
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by i82much View Post
Eh, I dunno. I've read plenty of threads with guys saying their hydraulic roller engines have been together for years. Did every one of those guys catch this issue and modify their lifters, or is there another explanation?
Everyone that used a Roller Cam back then used Solid Roller Lifters.
All Out Drag Race.
If you made it one season no failures it was a Good Combo & Deemed Reliable .
Lots of luck too.

The Best costs.
Easy to put $5,000 into the Valvetrain & its still not the best.

  #83  
Old 06-07-2016, 07:20 PM
Steve C. Steve C. is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Liberty Hill, Tx. (Austin)
Posts: 10,430
Default

Stated- "...I went with the Crower Hippo solid rollers to go with the Stump Puller cam as many people on here have said they had good luck with them. Now I am going to be losing sleep after reading this thread. I guess all I can do is keep checking the lifters and listen for a change in lifter noise."

This thread was about hydraulic roller lifters. Regarding a solid roller set up as mentioned above. Among many, two very important things to keep track of:

1) Run adequate valvespring pressure and keep track of it. The loss of pressure is a killer on a solid roller set up on the street. And remember springs lose some pressure after run in.

2) Monitor your valve lash. If you lose lash and it won't stay consistent it is a good indicator of solid roller lifter issues.


.

__________________
'70 TA / 505 cid / same engine but revised ( previous best 10.63 at 127.05 )
Old information here:
http://www.hotrod.com/articles/0712p...tiac-trans-am/

Sponsor of the world's fastest Pontiac powered Ford Fairmont (engine)
5.14 at 140 mph (1/8 mile) , true 10.5 tire, stock type suspension
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qDoJnIP3HgE
  #84  
Old 06-07-2016, 07:58 PM
tom s tom s is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: long beach ca usa
Posts: 18,796
Default

Or lash cap issues!Tom

  #85  
Old 06-07-2016, 08:32 PM
TCSGTO's Avatar
TCSGTO TCSGTO is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Warren,Ohio,USA
Posts: 1,677
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pontibeast View Post
My 455 is in the final stages of installation and I went with the Crower Hippo solid rollers to go with the Stump Puller cam as many people on here have said they had good luck with them. Now I am going to be losing sleep after reading this thread. I guess all I can do is keep checking the lifters and listen for a change in lifter noise. Does having a tight lash of about .0004 cold hurt or help with this issue? It's about 9.7 SCR with ported 6X-8 heads if that makes a difference.
Since your running iron heads the lash will shrink with engine heat. Try around .008 cold then see what it is hot. If you don't have enough cold lash the valves could be held open when things get toasty.

__________________
68 GTO,3860#
Stock Original 400/M-20 Muncie,3.55’s
13.86 @ 100
Old combo:
462 10.75 CR,,SD 330CFM Round Port E's,Old Faithful cam,Jim Hand Continental,3.42's.
1968 Pontiac GTO : 11.114 @ 120.130 MPH

New combo:
517 MR-1,10.8 CR,SD 350CFM E's,QFT 950/Northwind,246/252 HR,9.5” 4000 stall,3.42's
636HP/654TQ
1.452 10.603 @ 125.09
http://www.dragtimes.com/Pontiac-GTO...lip-31594.html
  #86  
Old 06-07-2016, 10:30 PM
leeklm's Avatar
leeklm leeklm is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Mpls, MN
Posts: 1,747
Default

Interesting discussion... This is my 2nd pontiac engine in recent years, and while I do not think my valve train noise is excessive, it certainly is noticeable. I am running the Stump Puller with new style Comp Lifters and full roller rockers.

I posted a video of the engine running here...

https://youtu.be/kFAm5o3YnZE

Of course it is difficult to pick up detail sounds from a phone video-- but, does this sound "normal"? It has been a couple of years, but I think my old engine sounded similar, which was using the Johnson short travel Hyd Rollers...

Thanks for Listening!

__________________
68 Firebird-- Street/Strip - 400/461 Eagle Forged Bottom End & Ross Flat top pistons. KRE 325 CFM D port, Ultradyne 263/271 @.050, .4267 lift. Crower Solid roller lifters and 1.65 stainless rockers. Quickfuel 1000 on Torker2 intake and 2" open spacer. Hedman 1.75" headers. TH400 w/brake. Ford 9" w/3.80 gears & 28x9 Hoosier pro bracket drag radial. Best ET: 1.35 60ft, 6.29 @ 107.20 mph, 9.99 @132.33 mph. 3,300 race weight
  #87  
Old 06-07-2016, 10:53 PM
wheneaglesfly wheneaglesfly is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Chicago IL
Posts: 644
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by leeklm View Post
Interesting discussion... This is my 2nd pontiac engine in recent years, and while I do not think my valve train noise is excessive, it certainly is noticeable. I am running the Stump Puller with new style Comp Lifters and full roller rockers.

I posted a video of the engine running here...

https://youtu.be/kFAm5o3YnZE

Of course it is difficult to pick up detail sounds from a phone video-- but, does this sound "normal"? It has been a couple of years, but I think my old engine sounded similar, which was using the Johnson short travel Hyd Rollers...

Thanks for Listening!
Sounds like a Mechanical flat tappet cam with a few valves or rocker arms set loose.
I Think GTOFREEK is onto something with a Viable solution.

I only use solids.
After max performance & minimum 7K redline.

  #88  
Old 06-07-2016, 10:55 PM
67GP428's Avatar
67GP428 67GP428 is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Goodyear, Az
Posts: 718
Default

Other than the loud lifters, is it safe to run the car like this? I feel like I have loud lifters in my newly built 400?

__________________
1965 Pontiac 2+2 421 HO auto
1967 Pontiac Grand Prix 428 4 speed- sold
1968 Firebird 400 auto - sold
1967 Bonneville Brougham 2 dr. hardtop. 1969 AMC Rebel SST wagon-sold
  #89  
Old 06-07-2016, 10:59 PM
wheneaglesfly wheneaglesfly is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Chicago IL
Posts: 644
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 67GP428 View Post
Other than the loud lifters, is it safe to run the car like this? I feel like I have loud lifters in my newly built 400?
I would say no.
If you have ever seen the carnage damage done when a roller lifter wheel fails & the tiny needle bearings scatter throughout the engine..........Like a Nuclear A- Bomb went off inside of the engine.
1 needle bearing will destroy all.
I have seen $40,000- 50,000 dollar dirt track race engine destroyed by this manner.
Only parts usable again was the Valve covers & Intake manifold.

  #90  
Old 06-07-2016, 11:00 PM
wheneaglesfly wheneaglesfly is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Chicago IL
Posts: 644
Default

Not just Pontiac Land........this stuff happens in the Corvette world too.....All dreams come to an end instant.....

  #91  
Old 06-07-2016, 11:09 PM
tom s tom s is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: long beach ca usa
Posts: 18,796
Default

Scott,remind me to listen next time I see the car.Hyd roller cam and lifters?Tom

  #92  
Old 06-07-2016, 11:18 PM
67GP428's Avatar
67GP428 67GP428 is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Goodyear, Az
Posts: 718
Default

Lifters. Sounds like it's only from #1 cylinder? There's more to my story. Will have to talk more in depth. Might have different issues? Thanks Scott

__________________
1965 Pontiac 2+2 421 HO auto
1967 Pontiac Grand Prix 428 4 speed- sold
1968 Firebird 400 auto - sold
1967 Bonneville Brougham 2 dr. hardtop. 1969 AMC Rebel SST wagon-sold
  #93  
Old 06-07-2016, 11:58 PM
dataway's Avatar
dataway dataway is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Saratoga NY
Posts: 8,943
Default

Does anyone run plain, no roller, solid lifters anymore?

My only experience with them has been on old motorcycles .... they make some noise, and need adjustment now and then, but they tend to be pretty bullet proof, rarely seen one fail.

Is there a reason they are not commonly used on hot rods these days?

  #94  
Old 06-08-2016, 12:01 AM
wheneaglesfly wheneaglesfly is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Chicago IL
Posts: 644
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dataway View Post
Does anyone run plain, no roller, solid lifters anymore?

My only experience with them has been on old motorcycles .... they make some noise, and need adjustment now and then, but they tend to be pretty bullet proof, rarely seen one fail.

Is there a reason they are not commonly used on hot rods these days?
I do.

ABSOLUTE 100 % RELIABILITY.

Ron Iskenderian custom ground for me recent.

  #95  
Old 06-08-2016, 12:04 AM
wheneaglesfly wheneaglesfly is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Chicago IL
Posts: 644
Default

Running 4,000- 7,000 RPMs 75-80 % of the time on the street.
10,000 miles each time before teardown to inspect & freshen the engine.
Cam & Lifters like New.

  #96  
Old 06-08-2016, 12:05 AM
wheneaglesfly wheneaglesfly is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Chicago IL
Posts: 644
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dataway View Post
Does anyone run plain, no roller, solid lifters anymore?

My only experience with them has been on old motorcycles .... they make some noise, and need adjustment now and then, but they tend to be pretty bullet proof, rarely seen one fail.

Is there a reason they are not commonly used on hot rods these days?
Everyone wants Roller.
Solid Roller does give more HP.
But if you over rev or springs fail premature......Kiss the engine goodbye.

  #97  
Old 06-08-2016, 12:10 AM
Formulajones's Avatar
Formulajones Formulajones is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 10,847
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dataway View Post
Does anyone run plain, no roller, solid lifters anymore?

My only experience with them has been on old motorcycles .... they make some noise, and need adjustment now and then, but they tend to be pretty bullet proof, rarely seen one fail.

Is there a reason they are not commonly used on hot rods these days?
I have 3 cars here with solid flat tappets. No issues with them at all. I check them once a year is all that's needed.
One thing I won't do is run a solid roller on a cam that was ground with hydraulic rollers in mind. If I want solid rollers, I'd run the proper stick to go with it.
On the hydraulic roller deal, the noise seems hit or miss. The previous 455 my father ran was a Comp hydraulic roller cam and lifter that was custom ground by Kauffman. That engine was dead nuts quiet for several years and he drove it 2-3 times a week.

  #98  
Old 06-08-2016, 12:17 AM
wheneaglesfly wheneaglesfly is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Chicago IL
Posts: 644
Default

When were Dirt Track Racing I chose an Isky Flat Tappet cam for our 010 4-bolt Main SBC.
369 Cubic inches.
Redline was 8500-8800 RPMS.
6.86 Gears in the Ford 9 inch.
Screamed for 20-200 Laps.
Wet sump pan. 10-quarts made for Left hand roundy round racing.
Iron Eagle heads.
Won near ever race including against 434 sbc Big guns.

  #99  
Old 06-08-2016, 01:16 AM
gtofreek's Avatar
gtofreek gtofreek is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Tucson, Az.
Posts: 7,494
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dataway View Post
Does anyone run plain, no roller, solid lifters anymore?

My only experience with them has been on old motorcycles .... they make some noise, and need adjustment now and then, but they tend to be pretty bullet proof, rarely seen one fail.

Is there a reason they are not commonly used on hot rods these days?
Just got done machining a 421 for darbikrash, and he is running a solid flat tappet cam that was nitrided. Running the Hylift/Johnson solid lifters with the EDM hole in them.

__________________
Paul Carter
Carter Cryogenics
www.cartercryo.com
520-409-7236
Koerner Racing Engines
You killed it, We build it!
520-294-5758

64 GTO, under re-construction, 412 CID, also under construction.
87 S-10 Pickup, 321,000 miles
99Monte Carlo, 293,000 miles
86 Bronco, 218,000 miles
  #100  
Old 06-08-2016, 06:38 AM
AG's Avatar
AG AG is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: NH
Posts: 3,250
Default

Here is a pic of a Crane HR lifter, the lower oil band is the same height as a hydraulic Pontiaxc lifter. The side pic shows the machining similar to what LSM did.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	crane HR2 sized.jpg
Views:	311
Size:	157.3 KB
ID:	430212   Click image for larger version

Name:	crane HR sized.jpg
Views:	288
Size:	119.7 KB
ID:	430213  

__________________
1967 Firechicken, 499", Edl heads, 262/266@0.050" duration and 0.627"/0.643 lift SR cam, 3.90 gear, 28" tire, 3550#. 10.01@134.3 mph with a 1.45 60'. Still WAY under the rollbar rule.
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:47 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017