#1  
Old 07-22-2021, 10:58 PM
John Milner's Avatar
John Milner John Milner is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,042
Default Machining crankshaft .040 on rod journals

What is everyone’s opinion on running a crankshaft that has been cut .040 on the rods? My N crankshaft is a little rough and the crank grinder thinks it will take .030 or .040 to clean it up. I’ve always ran std or no more than .020 under on the rods. .040 sure seems like a lot. The engine is a 68 WS 400 and will likely never see over 5,500 rpm and not be over 400 horsepower.

  #2  
Old 07-23-2021, 12:50 AM
Bill Meyer's Avatar
Bill Meyer Bill Meyer is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: West St Paul MN/Mesa,AZ- depending on weather
Posts: 823
Default

Just make sure you have bearings in hand before doing a grind that large. Not many companies offering bearings in odd sizes anymore.

__________________
GT37 3625lbs..Fastest bench seat, column shift, all steel,no power adders car at Norwalk
1.35 w/29.5x10.5x15
6.42 @ 109
10.09 @ 133
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Bill Meyer For This Useful Post:
  #3  
Old 07-23-2021, 03:07 AM
Schurkey Schurkey is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: The Seasonally Frozen Wastelands
Posts: 5,891
Default

In the years before crappy Communist Chinese cast cranks, guys took OEM Chevy 400 cranks, and cut the mains 0.200 (TWO HUNDRED thousandths, not twenty thousandths) so they'd fit into 350 blocks to make "Stroker 383" engines.

.040 is nothing, IF YOU CAN GET BEARINGS.

I have a Chevy crank at the machine shop right now, waiting on an offset grind that's gonna need 0.050 rod bearings when it's done. (Assuming I can get .050 bearings in a semi-post-Covid world.)

The Following User Says Thank You to Schurkey For This Useful Post:
  #4  
Old 07-23-2021, 04:22 AM
Dragncar Dragncar is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Humbolt County California
Posts: 8,283
Default

Do not worry about it, I have had a .030-.030 crank running hard forever.
It is very important to make sure your main bearing oil hole lines up exactly with the hole in the block on the tab side of the bearing. Or you will starve your rods from oil at high RPM.

  #5  
Old 07-23-2021, 06:10 AM
steve25's Avatar
steve25 steve25 is online now
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Westchester NY
Posts: 14,630
Default

He is only talking about his Rod bearings here.
I have done this on many of my motors right off the bat since it cuts down on both the Bearing speed ( heat reduction ) and the need for oil volume at the same time.

It also allows for a nice fat strength increasing radius to be ground in from the journal to the Crank cheek.

Just make sure during mock up assembly that you do not have to narrow the rod Bearing to clear this now bigger radius.

__________________
Wernher Von Braun warned before his retirement from NASA back in 1972, that the next world war would be against the ETs!
And he was not talking about 1/8 or 1/4 mile ETs!

1) 1940s 100% silver 4 cup tea server set.

Two dry rotted 14 x 10 Micky Thompson slicks.

1) un-mailed in gift coupon from a 1972 box of corn flakes.
Two pairs of brown leather flip flops, never seen more then 2 mph.

Education is what your left with once you forget things!
  #6  
Old 07-23-2021, 08:19 AM
Gary H's Avatar
Gary H Gary H is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 1,320
Default

Going .040 on the crank isn't a problem when it comes to the strength of the crank. The issue is getting a good quality bearing at that size. Definitely make sure the bearings are available before grinding. When I say available, not that they're listed, but actually in stock.

__________________
62' Lemans, Nostalgia Super Stock, 541 CI, IA2 block, billet 4.5" crank, Ross, Wide port Edelbrocks, Gustram intake, 2 4150 style BLP carbs, 2.10 Turbo 400, 9" w/4:30 gears, 8.76 @153, 3100lbs
The Following User Says Thank You to Gary H For This Useful Post:
  #7  
Old 07-23-2021, 09:07 AM
mgarblik mgarblik is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 6,035
Default

Clevite/Mahle has a listing for .040 undersize bearings for a Pontiac engine. That doesn't mean they are very available. However, a SBC STD rod bearing is 2.100 which is the same as a Pontiac bearing -.040. That doesn't mean it will automatically work. You or your machinist, will need to verify ALL the dimensions of a SBC bearing if you want to go that direction and make sure the bearing tang, width, chamfer and radial wall thickness is all the same and can be safely used. the .040' undersize crank journal is not an issue, the correct bearing is of course. I think the problem can be solved. Much less of an issue than a main bearing issue where bearings are very limited for a Pontiac engine.

  #8  
Old 07-23-2021, 11:21 AM
PAUL K's Avatar
PAUL K PAUL K is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sugar Grove IL USA
Posts: 6,280
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mgarblik View Post
Clevite/Mahle has a listing for .040 undersize bearings for a Pontiac engine. That doesn't mean they are very available. However, a SBC STD rod bearing is 2.100 which is the same as a Pontiac bearing -.040. That doesn't mean it will automatically work. You or your machinist, will need to verify ALL the dimensions of a SBC bearing if you want to go that direction and make sure the bearing tang, width, chamfer and radial wall thickness is all the same and can be safely used. the .040' undersize crank journal is not an issue, the correct bearing is of course. I think the problem can be solved. Much less of an issue than a main bearing issue where bearings are very limited for a Pontiac engine.
I think you are mistaken with your decimal point. Stock Pontiac rod journal is 2.250

__________________
Go fast, see Elvis!
www.facebook.com/PaulKnippensMuscleMotors
  #9  
Old 07-23-2021, 01:54 PM
mgarblik mgarblik is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 6,035
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PAUL K View Post
I think you are mistaken with your decimal point. Stock Pontiac rod journal is 2.250
Yes, I thought something didn't look right there. Sorry. So an option would be to grind the crank -.050 and use BBC rod bearings in STD size. I don't see why that wouldn't work if -.040 Pontiac bearings are not readily available. Again sorry for the incorrect SBC information.

The Following User Says Thank You to mgarblik For This Useful Post:
  #10  
Old 07-23-2021, 02:01 PM
455Grandville's Avatar
455Grandville 455Grandville is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: St Genevieve County
Posts: 1,535
Default

As long you have a good radius is the big factor.,

__________________
Two 1975 455 Grandvilles &
'79 455 Trans Am
‘69 Camaro SS 396/375 (owned since ‘88)
‘22 Toyota Sequoia V8
‘23 Lexus LS500 awd
‘95 Ford F-super duty 4wd 7.3 p-stroke
& countless Jeeps & off road vehicles.
  #11  
Old 07-23-2021, 03:11 PM
Gary H's Avatar
Gary H Gary H is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 1,320
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mgarblik View Post
Yes, I thought something didn't look right there. Sorry. So an option would be to grind the crank -.050 and use BBC rod bearings in STD size. I don't see why that wouldn't work if -.040 Pontiac bearings are not readily available. Again sorry for the incorrect SBC information.
You would actually have to use a rod with a BBC big end, dimension wise, to use that bearing.

__________________
62' Lemans, Nostalgia Super Stock, 541 CI, IA2 block, billet 4.5" crank, Ross, Wide port Edelbrocks, Gustram intake, 2 4150 style BLP carbs, 2.10 Turbo 400, 9" w/4:30 gears, 8.76 @153, 3100lbs
The Following User Says Thank You to Gary H For This Useful Post:
  #12  
Old 07-23-2021, 06:34 PM
John Milner's Avatar
John Milner John Milner is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,042
Default

Thanks for the replies everyone. It sounds like as long as I can get some bearings, it really wouldn’t be a big deal turning one .040 on the rods. I’ll be sure to get some bearings in hand before the crank gets ground.

  #13  
Old 07-23-2021, 07:14 PM
Half-Inch Stud's Avatar
Half-Inch Stud Half-Inch Stud is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: BlueBell, PA or AL U.S.A.
Posts: 18,457
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary H View Post
You would actually have to use a rod with a BBC big end, dimension wise, to use that bearing.
My 020 BBC Rod Bearings were only avail without the Rod-Pin hole. So Imhad to make fixture and Drill each Lower. Looks good.

__________________
12.24/111.6MPH/1.76 60'/28"/3.54:1/SP-TH400/469 R96A/236-244-112LC/1050&TorkerI//3850Lbs//15MPG/89oct

Sold 2003: 12.00/112MPH/1.61 60'/26"x3.31:1/10"/469 #48/245-255-110LSA/Q-Jet-Torker/3650Lbs//18MPG 94oct
Sold 1994: 11.00/123MPH/1.50 60'/29.5"x4.10:1/10"/469 #48/245-255-110LSA/Dual600s-Wenzler/3250Lbs//94oct
  #14  
Old 07-23-2021, 07:22 PM
padgett's Avatar
padgett padgett is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 467
Default

Thought the surface hardening (tufftriding ?) only went .010 deep.

__________________
Orlando - Where rust must be imported.
Web Site


The Following User Says Thank You to padgett For This Useful Post:
  #15  
Old 07-23-2021, 07:25 PM
PAUL K's Avatar
PAUL K PAUL K is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sugar Grove IL USA
Posts: 6,280
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary H View Post
You would actually have to use a rod with a BBC big end, dimension wise, to use that bearing.
Correct, Eagle and others offer a 6.635 BBC rod that would work well.

__________________
Go fast, see Elvis!
www.facebook.com/PaulKnippensMuscleMotors
  #16  
Old 07-23-2021, 08:03 PM
Tom Vaught's Avatar
Tom Vaught Tom Vaught is offline
Boost Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The United States of America
Posts: 31,294
Default

The 6.635" BB Chevy rod journal has a 2.200 journal diameter.
I have used that rod journal on several of my special Kellogg/Moldex forgings
with a 3.5" stroke. Joe at Moldex NITRIDES the journals after he makes the rod
journal modifications.

Marty Palbykin did a 473 cid engine built with a 2.100" Chevy SB rod journal to get
the stroke he needed for his 740 HP naturally aspirated engine before he went boosted.

If the crank work is proper people have run less than 2.00" rod journals in engines making over 1400 HP boosted. No worries except finding correct bearings for the Pontiac rod journal modifications.

Tom V.

ps and when the engine failed, the rods did not fail, or the bearings, or the pistons.
THE 455 BLOCK 4 BOLT STRAIGHT BOLT MAIN CAPS FAILED ON THE #2, #3, & #4 MAINS.

__________________
"Engineers do stuff for reasons" Tom Vaught

Despite small distractions, there are those who will go Forward, Learning, Sharing Knowledge, Doing what they can to help others move forward.

Last edited by Tom Vaught; 07-23-2021 at 08:37 PM.
The Following User Says Thank You to Tom Vaught For This Useful Post:
  #17  
Old 07-24-2021, 06:21 AM
steve25's Avatar
steve25 steve25 is online now
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Westchester NY
Posts: 14,630
Default

Factory cranks like the N crank ( and all others ) the OP is running are not surface hardened .

__________________
Wernher Von Braun warned before his retirement from NASA back in 1972, that the next world war would be against the ETs!
And he was not talking about 1/8 or 1/4 mile ETs!

1) 1940s 100% silver 4 cup tea server set.

Two dry rotted 14 x 10 Micky Thompson slicks.

1) un-mailed in gift coupon from a 1972 box of corn flakes.
Two pairs of brown leather flip flops, never seen more then 2 mph.

Education is what your left with once you forget things!
  #18  
Old 07-24-2021, 09:02 AM
Tom Vaught's Avatar
Tom Vaught Tom Vaught is offline
Boost Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The United States of America
Posts: 31,294
Default

I have had several Factory cranks Nitrided by Joe at Moldex (and his dad "Whitey") when they worked for the Moldex Crankshaft Owner (before he sold out to Joe a few years ago).
Mr Bob Gillian was his name and he was a crankshaft artist and expert.
He ground every type of crankshaft you could imaging in his lifetime. Automotive, Military, Aircraft, 1 cylinder, 2 cylinder, all the wat to 16 cylinder engines. They believed in Nitriding a crankshaft.

RIP Bob & Whitey.

Tom V.

__________________
"Engineers do stuff for reasons" Tom Vaught

Despite small distractions, there are those who will go Forward, Learning, Sharing Knowledge, Doing what they can to help others move forward.
  #19  
Old 07-24-2021, 05:52 PM
Formulabruce's Avatar
Formulabruce Formulabruce is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: North East of AMES PERFORMANCE, in the "SHIRE"
Posts: 9,363
Default

Consider a full Re balance on that crank and whole assembly. Grab some plastic gauge.

__________________
"The Future Belongs to those who are STILL Willing to get their Hands Dirty" .. my Grandfather

Last edited by Formulabruce; 07-24-2021 at 05:57 PM.
  #20  
Old 07-24-2021, 07:54 PM
geeteeohguy's Avatar
geeteeohguy geeteeohguy is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Fresno, California
Posts: 5,313
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by steve25 View Post
He is only talking about his Rod bearings here.
I have done this on many of my motors right off the bat since it cuts down on both the Bearing speed ( heat reduction ) and the need for oil volume at the same time.

It also allows for a nice fat strength increasing radius to be ground in from the journal to the Crank cheek.

Just make sure during mock up assembly that you do not have to narrow the rod Bearing to clear this now bigger radius.
This^^^. Built a .030/.040 under 389 years ago and it was just fine. Pontiac cranks are super beefy and cutting undersize is not an issue.

__________________
Jeff
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:29 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017