#1  
Old 03-25-2023, 03:11 PM
jlm69 jlm69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Bridgewater, NJ USA
Posts: 107
Post LIFTER BORE SIZES IN AN ASSEMBLED SHORT BLOCK

So, I was going to bite the bullet and order solid roller lifters for my assembled RAV short block that I had received delivery of to me about last summer. I figured before I do, I should measure the existing lifter bores which had sleeves installed. I purchased and set-up my dial bore gauge and took the following measurements, and my results are in the drawing attached.

I wanted to get a consensus about these numbers because I'm really concerned about the
Intake lifter bore for Cylinder number 3.

Your Thoughts????
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	RAV LIFTER BORE SIZES.jpg
Views:	284
Size:	72.9 KB
ID:	609669  

  #2  
Old 03-25-2023, 04:36 PM
mgarblik mgarblik is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 6,035
Default

Since your assembled, easy solution isn't so easy. That one is big, I might re-set your gauge and just measure them all again. If consistent, then you really have 3 choices. 1. Measure your lifters and see if you "get lucky" and have 1 big one. It does happen. If your using high end lifters, like Jesel, they will make you an oversize one or a pair. Mass produced ones like Morel, I doubt it. 2. disassemble and drive the bushing out and put a new one in. 3. Run it and don't worry about it. It's not ideal and you will have some leakage. But I doubt it will be the cause of a failure on it's own. My guess, looking at your measurements, is the bushings were not honed to size. I bet they were just reamed and possibly a ball hone run through them for a finish. A flat stone rigid hone is really the only way to get really straight, consistent size on the bushings. Iron blocks especially, push the bushings all over the place when you drive them in. Aluminum blocks are a little easier. How do they look for out of round and taper?

The Following User Says Thank You to mgarblik For This Useful Post:
  #3  
Old 03-26-2023, 11:16 AM
jlm69 jlm69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Bridgewater, NJ USA
Posts: 107
Unhappy

Quote:
Originally Posted by mgarblik View Post
Since your assembled, easy solution isn't so easy. That one is big, I might re-set your gauge and just measure them all again. If consistent, then you really have 3 choices. 1. Measure your lifters and see if you "get lucky" and have 1 big one. It does happen. If your using high end lifters, like Jesel, they will make you an oversize one or a pair. Mass produced ones like Morel, I doubt it. 2. disassemble and drive the bushing out and put a new one in. 3. Run it and don't worry about it. It's not ideal and you will have some leakage. But I doubt it will be the cause of a failure on it's own. My guess, looking at your measurements, is the bushings were not honed to size. I bet they were just reamed and possibly a ball hone run through them for a finish. A flat stone rigid hone is really the only way to get really straight, consistent size on the bushings. Iron blocks especially, push the bushings all over the place when you drive them in. Aluminum blocks are a little easier. How do they look for out of round and taper?

MGARBLIK,

I must have checked the gauge against a my micrometer multiple times especially after I came across that one bore and freaked, then checked it another half dozen times to make sure I saw what I was seeing before me.

I haven't checked it for out-of-round or taper yet, but I'll get to that.

I don't see anything down inside the sleeves or into the block to restrict oil flow, so I'm assuming I'll have to use oil restricting pushrods.

I will check this out, but does Jesel actually make custom ordered diameter lifters??

Have you ever heard of anything like this situation before??

I haven't run this short block at all. If I can get a custom lifter I may go that route, but I know there's $$$$$ in that. Having to take apart a newly built short block is not what I really want to do, I but may have to face that fact. If I have to go that route, I'll have to call the engine builder and let him know what I found and drive it all the way back down south rather than having it shipped.

  #4  
Old 03-26-2023, 11:47 AM
mgarblik mgarblik is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 6,035
Default

You need to look very closely in the bronze sleeves for a tiny oil feed hole drilled through the sleeve. This would be oil for the lifters. A .030" hole is a large enough feed for solid rollers. If no oil feed hole at all, that's another issue. That would mean no oil to the lifters. If it has a giant hole in it like the stock lifter bores, then that's another problem. No restrictor pushrod in the world will be able to block enough oil with some of those clearances. Putting 16 bronze sleeves in a stock block Pontiac is a big job. Did they have a Pontiac BHJ Lifter True fixture to install them? If not, the only other way to get them all in straight would be a semi-auto CNC mill or a dedicated full CNC Milling center with a program for a Pontiac V-8. This would be a rare situation. If they just drilled and reamed the bores for bushings with a giant magnetic drill or a manual mill, without a fixture, the lifters could be going off in every different direction. I would like to know a little more about the shop, what equipment they used to bush 16 lifter bores, stock block or aftermarket, iron or aluminum. Not saying an average really good machine shop couldn't put bushings in but this is a major machining operation that has to be done right. This is typically a $1000.00-1200.00 operation by itself to install 16 bushings on the crank centerline and hone to fit. It's an all day job with the fixture and a manual mill.

The Following User Says Thank You to mgarblik For This Useful Post:
  #5  
Old 03-26-2023, 02:21 PM
242177P's Avatar
242177P 242177P is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,709
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mgarblik View Post
I would like to know a little more about the ... stock block or aftermarket, iron or aluminum.
Ram Air V.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jlm69 View Post
I will check this out, but does Jesel actually make custom ordered diameter lifters??
If the bores were opened large enough, Ford .875 lifters also have a high oil band. Dunno.

  #6  
Old 03-26-2023, 02:48 PM
mgarblik mgarblik is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 6,035
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 242177P View Post
Ram Air V.

If the bores were opened large enough, Ford .875 lifters also have a high oil band. Dunno.
Depending on the wall thickness of the bushings, Crower has a .903-.904 lifter and a .937" as well. If enough wall thickness and the bushings have an oil hole in the right place, that's a good option. .875, I have never used in a Pontiac. But worth investigating as well.

The Following User Says Thank You to mgarblik For This Useful Post:
  #7  
Old 03-26-2023, 03:16 PM
tom s tom s is online now
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: long beach ca usa
Posts: 18,764
Default

If it was my RA V block it would come apart and have all 16 bushed.FWIW,Tom

The Following User Says Thank You to tom s For This Useful Post:
  #8  
Old 03-26-2023, 03:40 PM
jlm69 jlm69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Bridgewater, NJ USA
Posts: 107
Post

OK....

The block is an original cast iron V block.
I took all my stuff about a year and a half ago to the our guys in Lawrenceburg, Tennesse that I know have an exceptional amount of Pontiac knowledge.
All 16 lifter bores were bushed with new bronze sleeves. I just need to look down into them to check out for the oil restrictors and whether or not they're out of round and if bores have a taper.

Knowing who these guys are I had a lot of trust in them....and by the way I still do!!!
I will check out a couple of different ways to deal with this and the last resort would be to have a discussion with them on how best WE can resolve this since this is a finished, unrun, off the pallet short block build with no time on it, still on the engine cradle it was delivered with.

  #9  
Old 03-26-2023, 05:50 PM
Skip Fix's Avatar
Skip Fix Skip Fix is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Katy,TX USA
Posts: 20,541
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mgarblik View Post
Depending on the wall thickness of the bushings, Crower has a .903-.904 lifter and a .937" as well. If enough wall thickness and the bushings have an oil hole in the right place, that's a good option. .875, I have never used in a Pontiac. But worth investigating as well.
I was wondering about a .903 Mopar but was unsure of wall thickness.

__________________
Skip Fix
1978 Trans Am original owner 10.99 @ 124 pump gas 455 E heads, NO Bird ever!
1981 Black SE Trans Am stockish 6X 400ci, turbo 301 on a stand
1965 GTO 4 barrel 3 speed project
2004 GTO Pulse Red stock motor computer tune 13.43@103.4
1964 Impala SS 409/470ci 600 HP stroker project
1979 Camaro IAII Edelbrock head 500" 695 HP 10.33@132 3595lbs
  #10  
Old 03-26-2023, 11:13 PM
blueghoast's Avatar
blueghoast blueghoast is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,396
Default

What was the reasoning for bushing in the first place?
Was there a problem to begin with, Just wondering what the reason was?

GT

  #11  
Old 03-27-2023, 05:50 AM
25stevem's Avatar
25stevem 25stevem is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 1,744
Default

I would be very concerned with the high levels of side loading that roller lifters place on the the stock passenger side lifter bank in terms of there thickness no less with then now being thinner due to the sleving.

I hope at a minimum that your running some type of lifter brace?

__________________
I do stuff for reasons.
  #12  
Old 03-27-2023, 06:41 AM
242177P's Avatar
242177P 242177P is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,709
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 25stevem View Post
I hope at a minimum that your running some type of lifter brace?
Ram Air V.

Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	hppp_0903_25_z-ram_air_v-pontiac_block.jpg
Views:	496
Size:	116.4 KB
ID:	609785  

  #13  
Old 03-27-2023, 07:23 AM
25stevem's Avatar
25stevem 25stevem is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 1,744
Default

Yup, I know, but still how much meat was taken out of the bores to get the sleeves in?
The factory engineers never dreamed that open spring pressures could be used that would need to top 600 psi.
I just don’t want to hear of yet another super rare factory V block of someone’s suffering broken off lifter bores.

__________________
I do stuff for reasons.
The Following User Says Thank You to 25stevem For This Useful Post:
  #14  
Old 03-27-2023, 10:33 AM
tom s tom s is online now
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: long beach ca usa
Posts: 18,764
Default

my 428 block has bronze sleeves,when built 25 years ago it had 200 on the seats and 600 open and never had a issue,now has 160 and 350 open as I went to hyd rollers.NO joined lifter bores.I have only seen one V block with a broken bore and it had not been sleeved.FWIW,Tom

The Following User Says Thank You to tom s For This Useful Post:
  #15  
Old 03-27-2023, 02:35 PM
Dragncar Dragncar is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Humbolt County California
Posts: 8,283
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 242177P View Post
Ram Air V.

Every PMD 400-455 should have been made like that. It was 25 cents more iron.
Bean counters won.

  #16  
Old 03-27-2023, 06:39 PM
tom s tom s is online now
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: long beach ca usa
Posts: 18,764
Default

Anyone notice that RA V block has a transfer lug?Tom

The Following User Says Thank You to tom s For This Useful Post:
  #17  
Old 03-27-2023, 07:08 PM
25stevem's Avatar
25stevem 25stevem is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 1,744
Default

I might be more of the opinion that these vertical rib reinforcements where done to help keep the block from splitting up through the mains like Arnie and Jess Tyree and others where experiencing.

Anyone recall the lifter bores ripping out on the earlier supercharged nitro drag cars?

__________________
I do stuff for reasons.
  #18  
Old 03-27-2023, 07:20 PM
25stevem's Avatar
25stevem 25stevem is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 1,744
Default

So the RAV block and the early 389 motors have this rib in the crankcase on the passenger side, does the SD455 have that rib also?
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	8C2407D8-F79F-4766-B6F5-FC52923E2672.jpg
Views:	148
Size:	55.2 KB
ID:	609862  

__________________
I do stuff for reasons.
  #19  
Old 03-28-2023, 02:35 AM
Dragncar Dragncar is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Humbolt County California
Posts: 8,283
Default

What we could use is a stock looking aftermarket block made of the same grade of iron as the RAIV and V blocks. No need to have iron like a IA2 has. Solid lifter galley like a sbc with 1/8" more materiel around the lifter bores and the extra rib along the pan rail like the 59-60 blocks. Siamesed bores too. With splayed ductile iron main caps like Milodon sells.
That ought to do it.
Bet you could make 1000 NA HP with a block like that and still look OEM.

The Following User Says Thank You to Dragncar For This Useful Post:
  #20  
Old 03-28-2023, 05:00 PM
jlm69 jlm69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Bridgewater, NJ USA
Posts: 107
Unhappy

Sooooooooooo.........

I called Jesel and had a discussion with the folks in the Custom Shop.
They will make me a custom bronze bushing if needed, but not a custom diameter lifter.
So that's out.... Nice dream, but shot too S--T.

Didn't check for taper or out of round because I used a camera to get the best view I could of the inside of the bore and what didn't I find????????

The oil restrictors. So I guess my mind is made up for me and I have to get this short block disassembled. So back to the engine builder it goes....After I have a discussion with him this week.

Stay tuned.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4350 (1).JPG
Views:	153
Size:	27.6 KB
ID:	609877  

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:55 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017