Pontiac - Boost Turbo, supercharged, Nitrous, EFI & other Power Adders discussed here.

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-12-2019, 04:08 PM
thirdgen455's Avatar
thirdgen455 thirdgen455 is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 677
Default My efi intakes

The first intake is the gutsram with Holley hi ram top 300-217 and 300-218.
It's going to need some welding and a lot of machining to finish up.

The second is my dominator efi super victor. It's already port matched to my 340+ cfm Butler heads, opened up in the plenum has the injector bungs. So I plan on running it first. I just have to open up a hole for the 4500 base.

I'd like to get some testing in on both intakes, along with 4150 efi victor I have with a Edelbrock 90 degree elbow and 90mm throttle body. Both of the hi rams are 105mm.

I'll try and start a build thread when I get closer to running. I still need to bolt the heads on and measure the pushrods, and figure out the fuel system from the fuel cell to the fuel pressure regulator and back. Also need a drive shaft made. But after almost 15 years I have almost everything to build the car.

I also want to thank Tom for helping through out the years to get this far.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Resized_20190308_174932_8998.jpg
Views:	338
Size:	38.3 KB
ID:	507854   Click image for larger version

Name:	20190312_004106.jpg
Views:	301
Size:	31.7 KB
ID:	507855  

  #2  
Old 03-13-2019, 07:39 AM
charlie66's Avatar
charlie66 charlie66 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,266
Default

I like the first pic..

__________________
My Half AN Injun.....
  #3  
Old 03-13-2019, 08:05 AM
taff2's Avatar
taff2 taff2 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: South Wales in UK.
Posts: 2,172
Default

Yes, me too, although I intend doing it a little bit different on ours. I don't see the need to use the Holley lower box section-the Gutsram and my modded Offy 360 dual quad both have plenty of plenum volume- so I'll be bolting a 3/8" thick ali plate to the manifolds carb mounting flanges and then bolting the Holley efi top section to the ali plate, shouldn't be any welding or machining needed.
ps, the 3/8" plate will have radiused entries into the manifold plenum/s

  #4  
Old 03-13-2019, 08:32 AM
thirdgen455's Avatar
thirdgen455 thirdgen455 is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 677
Default

Thanks charlie!

Taff I agree about the lower, what you are saying will work perfectly. I just want as much volume as I can get. I was going to do this with my vortech box, but decided I can put it better use on another project.

This will also be boosted using the Luhn brackets and YSI I got from 4RSFEDGTO.

  #5  
Old 03-13-2019, 09:00 AM
Tom Vaught's Avatar
Tom Vaught Tom Vaught is offline
Boost Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The United States of America
Posts: 31,303
Default

There is a relationshop between the manifold volume/velocity and the plenum volume.

Personal opinion is that the upper LS Holley LID without at least some volume below the lid will feed the majority of the air to the back of the plenum. Lean rear cylinders and rich front cylinders.

With the right EFI system you can remove duty cycle on the injectors on those cylinders but they will not make the power of the front cylinders. Just an observation from a lot of dyno testing. Marcella's intake looks the way it does for a reason.

Tom V.

__________________
"Engineers do stuff for reasons" Tom Vaught

Despite small distractions, there are those who will go Forward, Learning, Sharing Knowledge, Doing what they can to help others move forward.
  #6  
Old 03-13-2019, 07:43 PM
taff2's Avatar
taff2 taff2 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: South Wales in UK.
Posts: 2,172
Default

Thanks for that insight Tom, maybe I'll have to re-think my plan, is there a certain amount of 'below the lid' volume I should be looking for? I'd like to keep the height down but don't want to give up any power, do you think a short baffle just behind the first plenum would catch and direct more airflow into the front cylinders without giving up flow?

  #7  
Old 03-13-2019, 08:15 PM
thirdgen455's Avatar
thirdgen455 thirdgen455 is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 677
Default

Thought I'd add a pic without the lower. And how the top fits to the g-ram using the topper. You can see the holley top is much larger than the g-ram top.

hope the visual helps.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	20190313_190210.jpg
Views:	213
Size:	30.4 KB
ID:	507897   Click image for larger version

Name:	20190313_190915.jpg
Views:	188
Size:	30.1 KB
ID:	507898  

  #8  
Old 03-14-2019, 12:28 AM
performerrpm's Avatar
performerrpm performerrpm is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: oklahoma
Posts: 1,998
Send a message via AIM to performerrpm
Default

man that looks cool as hell....it sux u cant just by something like that off the shelf...like the ls guys

  #9  
Old 03-14-2019, 07:14 AM
taff2's Avatar
taff2 taff2 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: South Wales in UK.
Posts: 2,172
Default

Thanks for the pics thirdgen, my plan was to put a 3/8" ali plate between the manifold and the lid, with the 3/8" plate bolted to the manifold with countersunk allen head bolts, and then the Holley lid bolted to the 3/8" plate. (to save any welding or machining costs). Maybe a thicker 'spacer' plate would work, perhaps an inch thick, or perhaps just easier to buy the Holley base too!
Your first pic with the Holley base does look better from a flow point of view.

  #10  
Old 03-14-2019, 07:25 AM
charlie66's Avatar
charlie66 charlie66 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,266
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by taff2 View Post
Thanks for the pics thirdgen, my plan was to put a 3/8" ali plate between the manifold and the lid, with the 3/8" plate bolted to the manifold with countersunk allen head bolts, and then the Holley lid bolted to the 3/8" plate. (to save any welding or machining costs). Maybe a thicker 'spacer' plate would work, perhaps an inch thick, or perhaps just easier to buy the Holley base too!
Your first pic with the Holley base does look better from a flow point of view.
If you're going to go the plate rout i would go with the biggest spacer you can fit. Better for straightening out the air for distribution. Mike leach had like 6" of spacer ... JMO

__________________
My Half AN Injun.....
  #11  
Old 03-14-2019, 07:41 AM
JSPONT's Avatar
JSPONT JSPONT is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: ROCKY POINT NY
Posts: 2,917
Default

subscribed

  #12  
Old 03-14-2019, 10:55 AM
Chris Petersen's Avatar
Chris Petersen Chris Petersen is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: East Bethel MN
Posts: 959
Send a message via MSN to Chris Petersen
Default

I like the first picture. Back when I was planning mine, not much $ to spend. I used a victor EFI, and rails, and this elbow, had to slot the holes for it to bolt up to the intake, but works good with a cheap LS throttlebody.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	elbow.JPG
Views:	135
Size:	42.3 KB
ID:	508000   Click image for larger version

Name:	turbo_pontiac_EFI.jpg
Views:	221
Size:	53.1 KB
ID:	508001  

__________________
*************************************

463 SRP .035 Pistons, Eagle rods, N crank, Pump gas, Victor intake, Holley 850BT carb, 6H heads,TH400 w/T-Break, Continental custom 3500 converter, 3.73 gears. TV7101 TURBO!

  #13  
Old 03-14-2019, 04:38 PM
Tom Vaught's Avatar
Tom Vaught Tom Vaught is offline
Boost Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The United States of America
Posts: 31,303
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by taff2 View Post
Thanks for that insight Tom, maybe I'll have to re-think my plan, is there a certain amount of 'below the lid' volume I should be looking for? I'd like to keep the height down but don't want to give up any power, do you think a short baffle just behind the first plenum would catch and direct more airflow into the front cylinders without giving up flow?
Looking at my intake again, the Gutsram V shaped plenum (with Holley Top and Bottom Piece), I think you could remove about an inch (or a bit more) from the Bottom side of the Holley Piece (Retaining the upper lid mounting bolt pattern flange) and still have adequate plenum volume. In my case when I removed the Upper Nash Dual Quad plenum I just had the runners so I had to get some of that plenum back with the Upper and Lower Holley pieces.

Tom V.

__________________
"Engineers do stuff for reasons" Tom Vaught

Despite small distractions, there are those who will go Forward, Learning, Sharing Knowledge, Doing what they can to help others move forward.
  #14  
Old 03-14-2019, 11:28 PM
hgerhardt's Avatar
hgerhardt hgerhardt is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: CA
Posts: 657
Default Plenum Volume

Back when I was designing my carbon-fiber EFI intake, I had no idea how big to make the plenum, so I asked Ken Duttweiler his opinion. He said to start with the same displacement as the engine, so mine is about 440 cu in. It makes a little more power than the best carb/intake combo I ever tried, so must be reasonably OK.

  #15  
Old 03-15-2019, 08:45 AM
Tom Vaught's Avatar
Tom Vaught Tom Vaught is offline
Boost Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The United States of America
Posts: 31,303
Default

Mr Duttweiller is one of the people I was fortunate enough to be introduced to (by my friend Dave Austin (Turbonetics and Vortech Supercharger Tech Expert)).

Very Modest Gentlemen, with a vast amount of Boost Experience.

Tom V.

__________________
"Engineers do stuff for reasons" Tom Vaught

Despite small distractions, there are those who will go Forward, Learning, Sharing Knowledge, Doing what they can to help others move forward.
  #16  
Old 03-15-2019, 09:30 AM
taff2's Avatar
taff2 taff2 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: South Wales in UK.
Posts: 2,172
Default

Thanks Tom. I've also thought that as the Holley lid is longer than the Gutsram or Offy intake- the lid could be offset towards the front of the manifold by around 2" - thereby giving the airflow a longer path in which to turn into the front runners.

  #17  
Old 03-15-2019, 01:27 PM
Tom Vaught's Avatar
Tom Vaught Tom Vaught is offline
Boost Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The United States of America
Posts: 31,303
Default

That would work well, TAFF, and actually allow the air to make the turn into the front runners a bit easier too. You would have to mock it up to see if moving the lid forward caused interference on some hood lines of the vehicles.

If no issues, simple to make a base plate that was moved forward and had the LS Bolt Pattern.

Tom V.

__________________
"Engineers do stuff for reasons" Tom Vaught

Despite small distractions, there are those who will go Forward, Learning, Sharing Knowledge, Doing what they can to help others move forward.
  #18  
Old 03-23-2019, 05:32 PM
AIR RAM AIR RAM is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Homestead FL
Posts: 412
Default

Im actually really happy to run across this tread. I'm planning with my current 498 build with approx 15lbs boost. My goal is to have a FWD facing throttle body, Intercooler and manifold all tucked under a factory style 69 Firebird hood.

Perhaps adding an intercooler between the Holley High Ram Top and the intake would add much needed volume as well as cool the incoming air at the same time. They do make bolt on Intercoolers for that intake... just need to adapt it to the lower.

Over the past couple months, I have come up with a couple combinations that Im looking at however I'm leaning more towards #1 at the same time, the 671 intake manifold is basically void of any real runner length... So I would prefer to manage in longer runners.... somehow... which is why I came up with #2.

1) 671 lower intake manifold + 671 4" Intercooler + Holley High Ram Top. The only adapter that would need fabrication would be the plate between the top of the intercooler and the Holley High Ram top. This would stack up approximately 10.5" from the bottom of the lower intake manifold. It Should/possibly clear. Could come down an inch on the Intercooler.

2) Dual Quad + Adapter plate + Holley High Ram 2" Inter-cooler and then Holley High Ram top.

3) Take a Victor intake to Wilson Manifolds and ask them to modify it to include intercooler and low profile throttle body mount location. Basically tell them what i need and then let them have "Their way" with it.


Both set ups would be MPFI with a single bore LS 105 throttle body.

What MPFI system do you plan to run? What throttle body do you plan to run with it? Does the kit your planning on using use GM LS style connectors?

Looking forward to seeing what you end up with.

NICK

__________________
"The grass is not greener on the other side, its just fertilized with different $h!t"

Last edited by AIR RAM; 03-23-2019 at 05:50 PM.
  #19  
Old 03-24-2019, 07:15 AM
taff2's Avatar
taff2 taff2 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: South Wales in UK.
Posts: 2,172
Default

Larry at Wenzler just shipped our Gutsram intake, I mentioned to him that there is some interest in the Pontiac world for a high hp efi manifold similar to the Holley LS stuff, if enough of us email him then maybe he will cast up an efi top box and plenum similar to the Holley stuff that would be a bolt on to his Gutsram manifold, just a thought.

  #20  
Old 03-24-2019, 04:31 PM
ponjohn's Avatar
ponjohn ponjohn is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 9,543
Default

That is what the Pontiac community needs street or strip. (Gutsram)

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:28 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017