FAQ |
Members List |
Social Groups |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
What was the highest (numerically lowest) rear gear ratio available for a Firebird in 1968?
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
What was the highest (numerically lowest) rear gear ratio available for a Firebird in 1968?
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by grumpybear:
What was the highest (numerically lowest) rear gear ratio available for a Firebird in 1968?<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> 2.56 gears were the tallest available in '68 on the Firebirds, great for a freeway-flyer! [img]/infopop/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif[/img] Let's go racing! www.outlawpontiacs.com/members/B-Man2.php www.outlawpontiacs.com/members/B-Man.php
__________________
1964 Tempest Coupe LS3/4L70E/3.42 1964 Le Mans Convertible 421 HO/TH350/2.56 2002 WS6 Convertible LS1/4L60E/3.23 |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Thanks, B-Man. I thought I was something like that but I just couldn't remember what the exact ratio was. It been awhile.
you definately correct, that gear did fly once you opened them up. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Ratios available in '68 were as follows:
2.41, 2.56, 2.78, 2.93, 3.08, 3.23, 3.36, 3.55, 3.90, 4.33. [img]/infopop/emoticons/icon_smile.gif[/img] Steve |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Thanks Steve;
The 256 rung my bell. Thanks, folks. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by 68400HOBird:
Ratios available in '68 were as follows: 2.41, 2.56, 2.78, 2.93, 3.08, 3.23, 3.36, 3.55, 3.90, 4.33. [img]/infopop/emoticons/icon_smile.gif[/img] Steve<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> No 2.41 gears were available until '76 for the Firebirds (8.5" rear). The tallest ratio for the 8.2" rear was 2.56. [img]/infopop/emoticons/icon_smile.gif[/img] Let's go racing! www.outlawpontiacs.com/members/B-Man2.php www.outlawpontiacs.com/members/B-Man.php
__________________
1964 Tempest Coupe LS3/4L70E/3.42 1964 Le Mans Convertible 421 HO/TH350/2.56 2002 WS6 Convertible LS1/4L60E/3.23 |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Anyone need a 2:56 rear end out of a 69 bird?
__________________
"Bye" "Bye" Rice Boy!!! |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Sure, just bring it with ya next time ya visit So Cal! [img]/infopop/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif[/img]
Let's go racing! www.outlawpontiacs.com/members/B-Man2.php www.outlawpontiacs.com/members/B-Man.php
__________________
1964 Tempest Coupe LS3/4L70E/3.42 1964 Le Mans Convertible 421 HO/TH350/2.56 2002 WS6 Convertible LS1/4L60E/3.23 |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
I'll get right on that [img]/infopop/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif[/img] [img]/infopop/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif[/img] [img]/infopop/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif[/img]
Seriously though, I really didn't think any one would want the rearend, I just hate the idea of tossing it in the scrap pile at my Dad's shop
__________________
"Bye" "Bye" Rice Boy!!! |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
I was running 2.56 gears in my daily driver 455 Tempest (lower link in my sig.) but after they started howling I swapped in a spare 2.93 rear. Ran a 13.899@101.85mph with the 2.56 rear at near sea-level (Famoso in Bakersfield). The car didn't run any quicker at the track with the 2.93 rear (14.10@100mph at Carlbad) the car is cammed so mildly that it likes the 2.56s better. I sorta miss the 140 mph top end that I had with the 2.56 gears! [img]/infopop/emoticons/icon_eek.gif[/img] [img]/infopop/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif[/img]
Let's go racing! www.outlawpontiacs.com/members/B-Man2.php www.outlawpontiacs.com/members/B-Man.php
__________________
1964 Tempest Coupe LS3/4L70E/3.42 1964 Le Mans Convertible 421 HO/TH350/2.56 2002 WS6 Convertible LS1/4L60E/3.23 |
Reply |
|
|