#1  
Old 08-03-2024, 03:33 PM
Beers Beers is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2023
Location: Orinda, CA
Posts: 34
Default Need help identifying rear differential

The original 8.2” rear end in my ‘68 GTO looks to have been replaced by an 8.5” one, just judging from the square casting protrusions on the bottom corners.

Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2096.jpg
Views:	504
Size:	50.7 KB
ID:	637845

Trying to figure out what it came out of, but having a hard time finding a casting number through the standard layers of hard crud. I did find the stamping on the front of the passenger tube, looks like: CJ K-044 G. The only casting/date code I could find is not legible, it was on the underside front of the center section, on the passenger section.

Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4711.jpg
Views:	412
Size:	85.9 KB
ID:	637842
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4726.jpg
Views:	440
Size:	61.8 KB
ID:	637843


From the stamping, any ideas on what this could have come from? Or other areas to check for a casting number? (I’ve scraped off several areas and no luck so far).

Doesn’t look like the mountings were moved or added, but will need to scrape off a bunch more crud to verify that.

It’s not limited slip, and drives rpm-wise like it has 3.36 or 3.42 gears (I’m going to remove the cover soon to change out the oil anyway, so will verify then).

__________________
1968 GTO Aegena Blue

Previous: 1970 Firebird Formula 400, 1964 Catalina, 1968 Firebird, 1967 Firebird 400 conv
  #2  
Old 08-03-2024, 04:15 PM
67drake's Avatar
67drake 67drake is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Muscoda WI
Posts: 3,032
Default

I won’t even attempt.
Easy to tell when you pull the rear cover as the ring gear bolts are different size and thread. I can’t remember sizes off hand, but easy enough to look up. I have an 8.5 that all the experts claimed was an 8.2 but easy to miss visually from looking at the outside. I pulled out of a ‘72 Cutlass. I’m sure Ol Pinion Head might be able to tell.

__________________

‘63 LeMans- ‘69 400 w/ original transaxle. 2.69 gears.
‘55 Catalina
‘62 Mercury Meteor-all original, bought new by my grandfather
71' GTO -original 400/4-speed/3.23 posi
13.95 @ 102.1 on street tires @ 4055lbs.-now my sons ride
  #3  
Old 08-03-2024, 04:25 PM
johnta1's Avatar
johnta1 johnta1 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: now sunny Florida!
Posts: 21,866
Default

Need the date code year to be certain.
(the 044 is Feb 13 of the year)

But the CJ could be a 1971 Firebird with 3.42 gear and locking dif.
Or 1973 A or G body with 3.42 gear and locking dif.
Or 1977 A or G body with 2.56 gear and locking dif.

And if you had my luck it would be the 2.56 gear rear.


__________________
John Wallace - johnta1
Pontiac Power RULES !!!
www.wallaceracing.com

Winner of Top Class at Pontiac Nationals, 2004 Cordova
Winner of Quick 16 At Ames 2004 Pontiac Tripower Nats

KRE's MR-1 - 1st 5 second Pontiac block ever!


"Every man has a right to his own opinion, but no man has a right to be wrong in his facts."

"People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoid." – Socrates
  #4  
Old 08-03-2024, 04:26 PM
67drake's Avatar
67drake 67drake is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Muscoda WI
Posts: 3,032
Default

I THINK it was this one ( I have a few 8.5’s sitting around). Looks like an 8.2 by some standards.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2228.jpg
Views:	449
Size:	106.6 KB
ID:	637854  

__________________

‘63 LeMans- ‘69 400 w/ original transaxle. 2.69 gears.
‘55 Catalina
‘62 Mercury Meteor-all original, bought new by my grandfather
71' GTO -original 400/4-speed/3.23 posi
13.95 @ 102.1 on street tires @ 4055lbs.-now my sons ride
  #5  
Old 08-04-2024, 10:05 AM
Beers Beers is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2023
Location: Orinda, CA
Posts: 34
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 67drake View Post
I won’t even attempt.
Easy to tell when you pull the rear cover as the ring gear bolts are different size and thread. I can’t remember sizes off hand, but easy enough to look up. I have an 8.5 that all the experts claimed was an 8.2 but easy to miss visually from looking at the outside. I pulled out of a ‘72 Cutlass. I’m sure Ol Pinion Head might be able to tell.
I just picked up some gear oil so will pull the cover off this week, the insides don’t lie!

__________________
1968 GTO Aegena Blue

Previous: 1970 Firebird Formula 400, 1964 Catalina, 1968 Firebird, 1967 Firebird 400 conv
The Following User Says Thank You to Beers For This Useful Post:
  #6  
Old 08-04-2024, 10:16 AM
Beers Beers is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2023
Location: Orinda, CA
Posts: 34
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by johnta1 View Post
Need the date code year to be certain.
(the 044 is Feb 13 of the year)

But the CJ could be a 1971 Firebird with 3.42 gear and locking dif.
Or 1973 A or G body with 3.42 gear and locking dif.
Or 1977 A or G body with 2.56 gear and locking dif.

And if you had my luck it would be the 2.56 gear rear.

3.42 is what it feels like driving on the freeway, at 65 mph I’m just a little shy of 3K rpms with BFG 245/60 14’s. Definitely not 2.56, I’d be driving 90 with those lol. I’ll see what gears are in it this week.

Maybe the width end to end will shine light on whether it’s from a 2nd gen F body, or a later A/G. This could help me locate the casting number.

It does have some welding shenanigans on it after all, I can’t imagine these pointy mounts came on anything factory from GM.

Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4736.jpg
Views:	445
Size:	69.3 KB
ID:	637895

__________________
1968 GTO Aegena Blue

Previous: 1970 Firebird Formula 400, 1964 Catalina, 1968 Firebird, 1967 Firebird 400 conv
  #7  
Old 08-04-2024, 10:21 AM
67drake's Avatar
67drake 67drake is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Muscoda WI
Posts: 3,032
Default

Man, I hope you plan to grind that down. I’d hate to be working under there and hit my head on that!

__________________

‘63 LeMans- ‘69 400 w/ original transaxle. 2.69 gears.
‘55 Catalina
‘62 Mercury Meteor-all original, bought new by my grandfather
71' GTO -original 400/4-speed/3.23 posi
13.95 @ 102.1 on street tires @ 4055lbs.-now my sons ride
  #8  
Old 08-04-2024, 01:40 PM
AG's Avatar
AG AG is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: NH
Posts: 3,375
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 67drake View Post
I THINK it was this one ( I have a few 8.5’s sitting around). Looks like an 8.2 by some standards.
That looks like an Olds 8.5" rear.

__________________
1967 Firechicken, 499", Edl heads, 262/266@0.050" duration and 0.627"/0.643 lift SR cam, 3.90 gear, 28" tire, 3550#. 10.01@134.3 mph with a 1.45 60'. Still WAY under the rollbar rule.
The Following User Says Thank You to AG For This Useful Post:
  #9  
Old 08-05-2024, 12:44 PM
Beers Beers is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2023
Location: Orinda, CA
Posts: 34
Default

Popped off the cover, at least I know what gear ratio it is. 3.42’s. And aftermarket gears.

At least the teeth look great and oil was clean (never seen purple gear oil, assuming it is synthetic, especially since it doesn’t smell like GO). Somebody went through this rear end internally at some time…

Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4749.jpg
Views:	424
Size:	90.6 KB
ID:	637960
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4754.jpg
Views:	385
Size:	85.8 KB
ID:	637961

__________________
1968 GTO Aegena Blue

Previous: 1970 Firebird Formula 400, 1964 Catalina, 1968 Firebird, 1967 Firebird 400 conv
  #10  
Old 08-05-2024, 01:23 PM
'ol Pinion head 'ol Pinion head is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: INJUN Territory, Red State Merica!
Posts: 9,758
Default

Def, one of the two different versions of 8.5 A-body housings that Olds mfg for '71-72 Olds & Buick A-body's. Buick manufactured the style with the cutout rear cover AND the large totally squared off lugs on the bottom.

Since the early 90's have purchased near 350 8.5 A-body cores for performance rear builds, the Olds mfg style with the A10 axle bearings has always been the least common to pull.

The Olds axle plant, for some reason, also manufactured quite a few 8.5 A-body A9 axle bearing end housings with the same round cover housing. Am starting to pay attention to casting dates on that particular style housing, trying to determine if only manufactured towards the end of the '72 production run.

By far the Buick style center housing (2 plug welds visible outboard per side, as well as the cutout rear cover) is the most common of the '71-72 8.5 A-body housings. Inventory files notes I have 21 of the Buick style & only two of the Olds style.

__________________
Buzzards gotta eat... same as worms.
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to 'ol Pinion head For This Useful Post:
  #11  
Old 08-05-2024, 03:32 PM
Beers Beers is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2023
Location: Orinda, CA
Posts: 34
Default

Thank OPH, appreciate the info. You definitely know these.

Did Olds/Buick use these on other body styles as well in 71/72? Or could these be from a ‘73+ A-body? The upper control arm mounts are stock, but looks like the lower control arm mounts have been moved ~2 1/4” outboard to fit this ‘68.

Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4762.jpg
Views:	319
Size:	48.7 KB
ID:	637976
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4763.jpg
Views:	344
Size:	83.8 KB
ID:	637977

__________________
1968 GTO Aegena Blue

Previous: 1970 Firebird Formula 400, 1964 Catalina, 1968 Firebird, 1967 Firebird 400 conv
  #12  
Old 08-05-2024, 06:09 PM
'ol Pinion head 'ol Pinion head is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: INJUN Territory, Red State Merica!
Posts: 9,758
Default

Coil spring '73-77 A-body/'77+ B-body housings had inboard shock mounts as part of each lower control arm mtg bracket. Earlier A-body rears had outboard shock mounting. The oddest outboard shock mounts were on 8.5 A-body housings used on the housings in VistaCruiser wagons.

It looks like someone has crudely cut off that area on each of your lower control arm mtg brackets, that makes me believe it's a '73-77 style coil spring housing that the shock mounts have been modified.

The spread between their upper control arm perches on the '73-77 housings is several inches wider than on all the earlier A-body rears. I once ran across a '70 ElCamino where the frame crossmember area where the upper control arm mounts, had been cut out, & a section cut out of a '73 & later A-body had been welded in. The other fit problem with the '73-77 A-body rears is they are little over an 1" wider than the '71-72 8.5 A-body rears. With the factory drums installed, the width of the '71-72 8.5 A-body rears are 61 5/16". '68-72 10 bolt & 12 bolt "Chevelle" rears are also very close to that width with drums installed.

__________________
Buzzards gotta eat... same as worms.

Last edited by 'ol Pinion head; 08-05-2024 at 06:14 PM.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to 'ol Pinion head For This Useful Post:
  #13  
Old 08-05-2024, 07:03 PM
Schurkey Schurkey is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: The Seasonally Frozen Wastelands
Posts: 6,134
Default

'75 Monte Carlo 10-bolt axle showing A-body control arm and shock mountings.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Monte_Carlo_Axle_01.jpg
Views:	381
Size:	81.9 KB
ID:	637987   Click image for larger version

Name:	Monte_Carlo_Axle_02.jpg
Views:	348
Size:	112.2 KB
ID:	637988   Click image for larger version

Name:	Monte_Carlo_Axle_03.jpg
Views:	352
Size:	60.2 KB
ID:	637989  

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Schurkey For This Useful Post:
  #14  
Old 08-05-2024, 08:06 PM
Beers Beers is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2023
Location: Orinda, CA
Posts: 34
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Schurkey View Post
'75 Monte Carlo 10-bolt axle showing A-body control arm and shock mountings.
I think OPH nailed it. ‘73-‘77 A-body.

Looking at your photos Schurkey, and the ‘75 cutlass photo below, I can see how that bracket has been cut apart to separate the control arm and the shock mounting, and then welded back together on this differential to earlier 68-72 layout.

Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2165.jpeg
Views:	629
Size:	96.5 KB
ID:	637991

I’ll have to check the overall width again to get a more accurate measurement, but it’s about 55” to the inside of the axle flange (this diff has been converted to rear disc, so no drums to check overall width). And it’s about 7.5” between the insides of the mounted upper control arms (I don’t have another 68-72 A-body diff to compare this against so don’t know if this is a lot wider).

__________________
1968 GTO Aegena Blue

Previous: 1970 Firebird Formula 400, 1964 Catalina, 1968 Firebird, 1967 Firebird 400 conv
  #15  
Old 08-05-2024, 08:27 PM
67drake's Avatar
67drake 67drake is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Muscoda WI
Posts: 3,032
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beers View Post
I think OPH nailed it. ‘73-‘77 A-body.

Looking at your photos Schurkey, and the ‘75 cutlass photo below, I can see how that bracket has been cut apart to separate the control arm and the shock mounting, and then welded back together on this differential to earlier 68-72 layout.

Attachment 637991

I’ll have to check the overall width again to get a more accurate measurement, but it’s about 55” to the inside of the axle flange (this diff has been converted to rear disc, so no drums to check overall width). And it’s about 7.5” between the insides of the mounted upper control arms (I don’t have another 68-72 A-body diff to compare this against so don’t know if this is a lot wider).
Here’s the measurement inside flange to inside flange of the 8.5 I pictured earlier. I also just double checked an 8.5 that is from a 71 or ‘72 Skylark, and it’s measurement is identical to this one I pictured.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2260.jpg
Views:	357
Size:	46.4 KB
ID:	637992  

__________________

‘63 LeMans- ‘69 400 w/ original transaxle. 2.69 gears.
‘55 Catalina
‘62 Mercury Meteor-all original, bought new by my grandfather
71' GTO -original 400/4-speed/3.23 posi
13.95 @ 102.1 on street tires @ 4055lbs.-now my sons ride
  #16  
Old 08-05-2024, 08:32 PM
67drake's Avatar
67drake 67drake is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Muscoda WI
Posts: 3,032
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AG View Post
That looks like an Olds 8.5" rear.
Thanks. I pulled these so long ago, and can’t remember which is which. I could get these off of Craigslist for $50-75 each with open carriers and highway gears, so I stocked up figuring they would be harder to find in the future.

__________________

‘63 LeMans- ‘69 400 w/ original transaxle. 2.69 gears.
‘55 Catalina
‘62 Mercury Meteor-all original, bought new by my grandfather
71' GTO -original 400/4-speed/3.23 posi
13.95 @ 102.1 on street tires @ 4055lbs.-now my sons ride
The Following User Says Thank You to 67drake For This Useful Post:
  #17  
Old 08-05-2024, 08:56 PM
Beers Beers is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2023
Location: Orinda, CA
Posts: 34
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 67drake View Post
Here’s the measurement inside flange to inside flange of the 8.5 I pictured earlier. I also just double checked an 8.5 that is from a 71 or ‘72 Skylark, and it’s measurement is identical to this one I pictured.
Thanks 67drake! Looks like what I have here, I’ll double check.

__________________
1968 GTO Aegena Blue

Previous: 1970 Firebird Formula 400, 1964 Catalina, 1968 Firebird, 1967 Firebird 400 conv
The Following User Says Thank You to Beers For This Useful Post:
  #18  
Old 08-06-2024, 09:14 PM
Beers Beers is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2023
Location: Orinda, CA
Posts: 34
Default

Yup, the inside flange to flange is 55 3/8”, so this rear end is ~1/2” wider. Not a problem.

Thanks again for everyone’s help, especially OPH. Much appreciated.

__________________
1968 GTO Aegena Blue

Previous: 1970 Firebird Formula 400, 1964 Catalina, 1968 Firebird, 1967 Firebird 400 conv
The Following User Says Thank You to Beers For This Useful Post:
  #19  
Old 08-09-2024, 09:18 PM
59safaricat 59safaricat is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Land of the fee, home of the slave
Posts: 275
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beers View Post
(never seen purple gear oil, assuming it is synthetic, especially since it doesn’t smell like GO).
Royal Purple gear oil. It's synthetic.

The Following User Says Thank You to 59safaricat For This Useful Post:
  #20  
Old 08-10-2024, 01:07 AM
Schurkey Schurkey is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: The Seasonally Frozen Wastelands
Posts: 6,134
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beers View Post
(never seen purple gear oil, assuming it is synthetic, especially since it doesn’t smell like GO).
Any chance this stuff smells like grape juice?

Quote:
Originally Posted by 59safaricat View Post
Royal Purple gear oil. It's synthetic.
GM/ACDelco sells really expensive, synthetic gear oil (10-4016) that's listed on the bottle as having a "new grape scent".

https://www.amazon.com/ACDelco-10-40.../dp/B000QGOX1A

I'm just wondering if ACDelco is buying this stuff from Royal Purple.

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:42 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017