FAQ |
Members List |
Social Groups |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Looking to ID a factory three dueces manifold I bought years ago as a 1959 but doesn't fit, may be 57 or 58. Looks like cast aluminum- factory part number 540510 B-4-1. Any help?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Looking to ID a factory three dueces manifold I bought years ago as a 1959 but doesn't fit, may be 57 or 58. Looks like cast aluminum- factory part number 540510 B-4-1. Any help?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
I think 55 to 60 water patern is the same,then 61 to 64 is same and 65 a newer is the the same.Only wierd one is the 61 SD alu 3-2 that fits 60 head patern but uses the 61 timing cover with water dougnut.FYI,Tom
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Tom - you nailed it!
http://www.thecarburetorshop.com/Mul...bmanifolds.htm Lont - you have the "weird one". And by the way, welcome to the forums! Jon.
__________________
"Good carburetion is fuelish hot air". "The most expensive carburetor is the wrong one given to you by your neighbor". If you truly believe that "one size fits all" try walking a mile in your spouse's shoes! Owner of The Carburetor Shop, LLC (of Missouri). Current caretaker of the remains of Stromberg Caburetor, and custodian of the existing Carter and Kingston carburetor drawings. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
As Tom and Carbking stated, You have a 1961 389 SD alum. intake.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks to all who replied, Jon I see from your list that the manifold is probably a 1'61 super-duty. I have a Pontiac collector that is interested in the manifold and I don't see another "goat" in my future. Does anyone have any idea what this thing is worth (range would be fine). Thanks again. Lon
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
The easiest way to value something no rarer than this item would be to watch Ebay completed auctions. Take 3 items which sold, average the selling prices. Take this figure and multiply by 0.8 to obtain a rough wholesale value. Multiply the wholesale value by 2 to obtain a rough retail value.
Example - 3 similiar items sell for $90, $100, and $110. The average is $100. 0.8 times $100 is $80 (average wholesale value of the example). 2 times $80. is $160. (average retail value of the example). My opinion only. Others may have a differing opinion. This item is not rare, nor is it exceedingly desirable; just unusual. Since it has a limited universe of cylinder heads that it can be used with, the universe of buyers is also limited. My suggestion would be trade the manifold for something your prospective customer has that you want. The most interesting fact about this item, is that Pontiac tried tripower on the racing engines, and immediately dumped the tripower in favor of dual four-barrels and single four-barrels (lets not forget the three-barrel) for their racing engines. The tripower was relegated to street engines. Jon.
__________________
"Good carburetion is fuelish hot air". "The most expensive carburetor is the wrong one given to you by your neighbor". If you truly believe that "one size fits all" try walking a mile in your spouse's shoes! Owner of The Carburetor Shop, LLC (of Missouri). Current caretaker of the remains of Stromberg Caburetor, and custodian of the existing Carter and Kingston carburetor drawings. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
I think the 61 SD tripower to the "right"guy is worth $300.It can be used on any 55-60 head IF you put on a 61 type front cover OR block the water hole in the front of the intake for the rubber doughnut.FYI,Tom
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Tom, Don't you mean that the bare tri-power intake is worth $300.00? If it had carbs, they would bring more than that.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Does the aluminum intake offer any performance advantage over the cast iron tri-power intake, aside from the lower weight? What about the old Offenhouser 3-2 intakes? I passed one up at a show recently.
__________________
1967 Firebird 400 ragtop, auto 1957 Chieftain Safari ,2 doors, 3 deuces and 5 speeds 1972 Olds 442, 350 , auto, survivor 1983 Buick S&S Hearse, cheap transportation and parts hauler 1967 Buick GS 400 4speed |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
yes,bare intake,corret carbs are worth way more than the intake,Tom
|
Reply |
|
|