| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Social Groups |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Will headers from a 1965 GTO fit in a 1968 Lemans? I believe they are both "A" bodies, but can't remember.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
They are both a-bodies, yes. but the frame dimensions are slightly different... I don't know exactly where at though.
65-67 had the same frame, I think. (maybe 64 too, I'm not as familiar with those earlier models). Changed in 68; The frames from 68-72 are all pretty much the same.that probably doesn't help you much does it...
__________________
Matt 70 GTO 400 4-speed "Turbos make no noise and leave the line like Baby Diarrhea!" - GTOGeorge |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
It depends on the brand of header. You need to look in a catalog for that brand of header. Some are for 64-65. Others might be for 64-72. The only other way to know is to try to install them.
__________________
Bill 64 GTO, tube chassis w/606" IA tall deck, PG & a pro geared Fab 9". 2750 lbs. [email protected]/4, [email protected]/8, 1.1981-60-ft. 8/10/08
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
From my personal installs I found that generally a header from a 64-67 A-body will fit a 68-72 A-body. The 64-67 have a little less room around the top A-arms on top. They have a curved transition going from the side rails of the frame to the cradle or X-member under the motor. Which takes up needed room in those areas.
The 68-72 have an almost 90 degree transition where the cradle meets the side rails. So from what I have learned over the years is a set for 68-72 usually wont fit in those areas on a 64-67. I haven’t come across a set yet that of 64-67 that didn’t fit the 68-72. There may be some that don’t but I’ve never seen it yet. I did just learn from another member hear about a week ago that the 455 70’-72’ A-bodys have longer frame motor mounts that hang about 2” off the back of the frame. So I personally don’t know in that situation. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Awesome. Thanks for the responses guys. I knew this was the place to get the answer.
JR. |
| Reply |
|
|