Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-29-2011, 02:43 AM
gmil60 gmil60 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 18
Default 61 Pontiac 389 Crankshaft Change

Dear Members,
I'm in the process of rebuilding my 61 Bonnevilles 389. During the rebuild I want to change the rotating asymbly to make it a 421. The car has a Hydramatic transmission and I am having a problem locating a forged aftermarket crankshaft with the bolt circle and size that will accept the Taurus coupler ring /gearless flexplate. I want to keep the Hydramatic transmission so the adapter plate to use a later automatic is a direction I don't want to take. I would appreciate you help.
Sincerely Gmil60

  #2  
Old 12-29-2011, 11:03 AM
hellerods's Avatar
hellerods hellerods is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Arroyo Grande, Ca.
Posts: 477
Default

Why do you need a forged crankshaft for a cubic inch upgrade? A stock cast crank will work fine except for a race-only engine.

  #3  
Old 12-29-2011, 01:17 PM
gmil60 gmil60 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 18
Default 389 crankshaft change

You are right for my street application I don't need a steel crank. I decided to upgrade the lower end when I had it apart. I received a build proposal from Butller which gave me the idea to change out the lower end and upgrade the cylinder heads. If I can't find a aftermarket crank to work I will probably use a cast 421 crank. I spoke with Buttler performance, I'm in the process of sending my flex plate to their shop so they can match up a crankshaft and check the spacing.

Sincerely Gmil60

  #4  
Old 12-30-2011, 04:18 AM
Jack Gifford's Avatar
Jack Gifford Jack Gifford is offline
formerly 'Pontiac Jack'
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Phelps, NY 14532
Posts: 10,341
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gmil60 View Post
... bolt circle and size that will accept the Taurus coupler ring /gearless flexplate...
Every single Pontiac V8 '55 - '81 used the same crank flange bolt pattern.

I'm guessing you were trying to say "torus cover" (see 'torus' in any dictionary); but your [mis]spelling gave me quite a chuckle!

__________________
Anybody else on this planet campaign a M/T hemi Pontiac for eleven seasons?
... or has built a record breaking DOHC hemi four cylinder Pontiac?
... or has driven a couple laps of Nuerburgring with Tri-Power Pontiac power?(back in 1967)
... or has a Pontiac born the same year as Jim Wangers? (1926}
  #5  
Old 12-30-2011, 08:01 AM
gmil60 gmil60 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 18
Default

Being this is my first Pontiac, I did not realize the bolt circle on the rear crankshaft flange was the same. The majority of the rotating parts I am ordering through Butler due to their experience with Pontiac Engines. The actual question arose when I got ready to order the forged aftermarket crankshaft. I was asked by Butler to check the bolt circle and spacing of the flex plat and it did not match anything they had in inventory to send me. I can only assume companies like Scat seem to be making crankshafts mostly for late Pontiac engines.
Oh!! by the way I'm glad I gave you a chuckle with my spelling of Torus. I never knew anything like a fluid or hydraulic couplers existed before the purchase of this car. Thanks for your input
Regards gmil60

  #6  
Old 12-30-2011, 11:10 AM
Pontirag Pontirag is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Bisbee, AZ USA
Posts: 3,872
Default

[QUOTE=pontiac jack;4506674]Every single Pontiac V8 '55 - '81 used the same crank flange bolt pattern.

QUOTE]

Jack are you sure on this? I thought there was a change in the late 50's

  #7  
Old 12-31-2011, 01:33 AM
Safari Larry's Avatar
Safari Larry Safari Larry is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Palmdale, CA
Posts: 602
Default

The crank flange bolt pattern did not change in the late 50's. What did change was counterbalancing material was added to the flange which prevented bolting up a 55/56 dual range without removing a little material on either the flange or the flywheel. It is only a problem with the dual range. That was discussed here some time ago and is discussed at this link.

__________________
Larry Gorden
POCI 1956 Tech Adviser
www.PontiacSafari.com
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:05 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017