Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-01-2015, 08:13 AM
makilaak makilaak is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Espoo, Finland
Posts: 100
Default 69 front springs

I got a set of new front springs when I bought the car. Unfortunately they don't look the same as the old ones. New springs are longer, thinner, the one end is flat...

What you think, should they still fit?
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1178.JPG
Views:	84
Size:	231.2 KB
ID:	394317  

  #2  
Old 04-01-2015, 09:36 AM
gtohurstjudge's Avatar
gtohurstjudge gtohurstjudge is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: plano,tx.
Posts: 1,942
Default

The correct springs should look like your old ones. Buy a new set and use
Moog springs. The other brands out there are bad news. You can buy Moog from your local Auto supply, but you may need to get the correct part number for your application out of the OPGI catalog, as parts stores seem to have trouble coming up with the correct number to order. Tell me what specifically your car is...year model, hardtop or convertible, A/C or no A/c and I can give you the correct Moog part number to ask for.

  #3  
Old 04-01-2015, 10:33 AM
makilaak makilaak is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Espoo, Finland
Posts: 100
Default

1969 GTO convertible, no AC, stock 400+TH400.
The problem might be that I am located in Finland and parts are not available in all stores...

  #4  
Old 04-01-2015, 11:01 AM
1969GTO's Avatar
1969GTO 1969GTO is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: central ny
Posts: 1,776
Default

I don't mean to but in, but since this is a spring issue, maybe the spring guy can help.
My 69 GTO [I have had for 13 yrs] [bought from 2nd owner and he had no answer] the rear springs look and must be shorter than normal because it looks like for some reason the spring locators [round part the spring sits on the axle] has been extended about 2 inches and the rear springs rest on them.
If I were to jack up the car, remove the rear shocks, the rear springs still won't come out, like normal if you did that.
Does this make sense? any ideas?

__________________
color me gone
  #5  
Old 04-01-2015, 01:42 PM
Kenth's Avatar
Kenth Kenth is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Kingdom of Sweden
Posts: 6,098
Default

Your old spring has one pigtail end and is wrong for your car.
Your new spring looks correct. What Part-#?

MOOG has a matched set for 1969 A-body, #5440. It contains 1 #5386 drivers side and 1 #5390 for passenger side.
#5386 is 3.63" inside dia., .656" bar dia., 334lbs/in spring rate and 17.00" free height.
#5390 is 3.63" inside dia., .656" bar dia., 336lbs/in spring rate and 16.63" free height.

They have one square end and the other end is tangential, just like the new spring on your pic.

__________________
1966 GTO Tri-Power
1970 GTO TheJudge
http://www.poci.org/
http://gtoaa.org/
  #6  
Old 04-01-2015, 03:13 PM
makilaak makilaak is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Espoo, Finland
Posts: 100
Default

Many, many thanks! I just need to take measurements then! :-) I was rather sure that the springs were original as well all the bushings and ball joints....
I had option package for springs and shocks - does this matter?
Will that flat (square) side go upwards?

  #7  
Old 04-01-2015, 06:05 PM
Darth Menace Darth Menace is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 909
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kenth View Post
Your old spring has one pigtail end and is wrong for your car.
Your new spring looks correct. What Part-#?

MOOG has a matched set for 1969 A-body, #5440. It contains 1 #5386 drivers side and 1 #5390 for passenger side.
#5386 is 3.63" inside dia., .656" bar dia., 334lbs/in spring rate and 17.00" free height.
#5390 is 3.63" inside dia., .656" bar dia., 336lbs/in spring rate and 16.63" free height.

They have one square end and the other end is tangential, just like the new spring on your pic.
Dammit, I used the Moog 5400 for mine, which was recommended to me by the store.

  #8  
Old 04-01-2015, 07:11 PM
gtohurstjudge's Avatar
gtohurstjudge gtohurstjudge is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: plano,tx.
Posts: 1,942
Default

The 5440 springs are for an A/C equipped car. The correct number
for your application is 5372

  #9  
Old 04-01-2015, 07:33 PM
Darth Menace Darth Menace is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 909
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gtohurstjudge View Post
The 5440 springs are for an A/C equipped car. The correct number
for your application is 5372
Wow...where does the Moog 5400 come into play? I have seen it listed for this application in a few places.

  #10  
Old 04-02-2015, 04:17 AM
Kenth's Avatar
Kenth Kenth is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Kingdom of Sweden
Posts: 6,098
Default

#5400 is listed for many 1970-2 applications. They are 358lbs/in for somewhat heavier cars.

#5372 is 288,5lbs/in and too soft for a 1969 GTO w/ride and handling package option.

If a matched #5440 set is not needed for 1969 GTO, use two #5386 just like the 1968 GTO does, all applications exc. A/C.
(w/A/C use two #5390.)

__________________
1966 GTO Tri-Power
1970 GTO TheJudge
http://www.poci.org/
http://gtoaa.org/
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:59 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017