Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-16-2015, 07:06 PM
MaxWT MaxWT is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cambridge, Ohio
Posts: 53
Question '68 Frame paint.

I received negative comments about my frame/suspension paint from a Concours judge. What is the correct sheen of the black paint?

  #2  
Old 07-16-2015, 11:06 PM
PurelyGTO68 PurelyGTO68 is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 793
Default

In my opinion, the judge should have informed you what sheen was expected.

I am getting ready to start a frame off restoration on my 68 and I plan on using Chassis Black found at our local auto body paint shop. If someone doesn't like it then they can get their own car and paint it whatever color they want. Actually I am thinking of having it powder coated this time but the color will be very similar.

I stopped using POR brand chassis black paint because it has a fairly short shelf life and I always seem to end up with stale product.

If you are looking for rattle can chassis black, I have used SEM and NAPA brand with good results. The NAPA brand is Martin Senour Paint 7243. It is reasonably priced and appears to be of high quality. Hope this helps.

  #3  
Old 07-17-2015, 07:03 PM
Jeff Hamlin's Avatar
Jeff Hamlin Jeff Hamlin is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Beach side of Virginia
Posts: 9,731
Default

Chassis black should be about 60% degree gloss, aka Semi.

__________________
When I die, I want to go peacefully like my grandfather did, in his sleep.
Not screaming like the passengers in his car.
  #4  
Old 07-17-2015, 08:01 PM
MaxWT MaxWT is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cambridge, Ohio
Posts: 53
Smile Frame Paint

To PurelyGTO68, I agree, I would have liked to have some more info from the judge.

To Jeff Hamlin, Thanks, I thought it should be the 60% Semi gloss.

Your replies are appreciated.

  #5  
Old 07-17-2015, 11:15 PM
fiedlerh's Avatar
fiedlerh fiedlerh is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Illinois
Posts: 2,262
Default

I've seen many concours restorations with the paint too flat (IMHO).
It was closer to glossy than matte back in the day, BUT:
It was thinly applied and some areas were missed.
It was cheap paint, so the gloss went away pretty quick.
Based on the NOS parts I have, they were stingy with the black pigment. To make it right, I would probably add around 10% clear to the mix.
The specifications were probably not that stringent, so there will be year-to-year and plant-to-plant variations. There was a GM spec number for the paint, but I have not found what the spec means.
I don't know what it was in the late 60's, but a 72-73 spec for underhood parts was "...black enamel per 9790607 (#s hard to read) or equivalent. Finish must conform with GM 4350-M, class A96."

__________________
http://www.pontiacpower.org/
  #6  
Old 07-17-2015, 11:52 PM
PurelyGTO68 PurelyGTO68 is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 793
Default

This stuff is pretty good. I bought a gallon and ended up using all of it. It seemed to cover pretty well but I sprayed 3 coats anyway. One gallon can was enough for everything on the car I was working on ('61 full size)...frame, inner fenders, core support, under hood, air cleaner, brackets etc. If it's available at the local paint store then I'll probably use it again.

http://melrosecorvette.com/gm-chassis-paint-1050104/

  #7  
Old 07-19-2015, 10:43 AM
Bet Winner's Avatar
Bet Winner Bet Winner is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kernersville, N.C.
Posts: 1,688
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxWT View Post
I received negative comments about my frame/suspension paint from a Concours judge. What is the correct sheen of the black paint?
With the variances that paint surely got from factory to factory, it seems odd to get a comment from a judge unless the frame paint was very glossy or very flat. And at many/some of the inside shows I have seen, the lighting is very weak. The judges need to carry flash lights to see engine and suspension parts well. It is probably not easy to determine the gloss on a frame under a car in a dimly lit inside venue. And it is my thought that sometimes the way many of the cars are being restored becomes "factory correct" in many eyes. That may not be the case of course.

Did you paint the frame very glossy or very flat? I can understand a comment then.

__________________
My Wife: "I thought I married a sophisticated business man, but what I actually got was a redneck fisherman with muscle cars."

Some people know all of their rights, but none of their obligations.
  #8  
Old 07-19-2015, 04:48 PM
hakansan's Avatar
hakansan hakansan is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Linköping, Sweden
Posts: 423
Default

It´s a picture in the old GTO Restoration Guide (1985) on page 17 with a finger pointing on a frame where the finger is clearly reflecting on the frame. Anyone now if this is a restored frame or not?

__________________
`70 GTO, 370 hp, 3:90, TH400.
  #9  
Old 07-23-2015, 02:09 AM
PaulatFast PaulatFast is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Batesville IN
Posts: 2,623
Default

Frames should be glossier than the floors. Firewalls should be a touch flatter than the inner fenders and the core support. General rules to follow when restoring and judging.

Curious what was the exact comment?

Was there a point deduction?

__________________
Paul
FAST Automotive -The Pontiac restoration shop, not the fuel injection guys! I had the name first.

My site... needs updated-
www.fastrestorations.com


68 GTO's (RA II, RA I, HO, convert, Pro Street, Racecar, etc.), 2 69 GTO Judges, 70 GTO racecar -10.77 @ 124mph, 68 Tempest survivor, 3 03 Aztecs!
  #10  
Old 07-23-2015, 09:52 PM
Jerry H.'s Avatar
Jerry H. Jerry H. is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Clarkesville, GA
Posts: 5,632
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PurelyGTO68 View Post
This stuff is pretty good. I bought a gallon and ended up using all of it. It seemed to cover pretty well but I sprayed 3 coats anyway. One gallon can was enough for everything on the car I was working on ('61 full size)...frame, inner fenders, core support, under hood, air cleaner, brackets etc. If it's available at the local paint store then I'll probably use it again.

http://melrosecorvette.com/gm-chassis-paint-1050104/
Wow, that stuff has sure gotten pricey over the years! I remember buying it in 4 gallon cases for $32.00. That was not per gallon, that was for all 4! It WAS very good paint, but when they took the lead out I quit using it. Seemed it lost some of it's 'sheen' and it's durability.

__________________
LEAD, FOLLOW, OR GET THE HE!! OUT OF THE WAY!!!

HONEST JERRY'S SPEED AND EQUIPMENT
  #11  
Old 07-24-2015, 09:39 PM
MD79TA MD79TA is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 889
Default Sorry about hijacked thread

Don't like high jacking your thread but what do you guys use for engine bay and fite wall. Ready to drop engine in . Thanks Doug

__________________
1979 Trans Am
307 RWHP 380RWTQ
13.8@103

1979 400 Block, 1970 Heads, Unknown Cam, Comp Cam Lifters, Edelbrock RPM Intake, Hedman Headers, Holley 750 Carb, WFO Drop Base SOLD

1968 GTO convertable project. 400 auto with air. west coast car . Not started in 15 ..update now running (around block spinning tires all the way. Have a lot of cosmetic work to do winter of 17/18

1969 GTO 400 4 Speed this a complete project. Rebuild will start in spring of 2017. SOLD
  #12  
Old 08-05-2015, 03:15 PM
MaxWT MaxWT is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cambridge, Ohio
Posts: 53
Default

[QUOTE=PaulatFast;5437165]Frames should be glossier than the floors. Firewalls should be a touch flatter than the inner fenders and the core support. General rules to follow when restoring and judging.
I'm
Curious what was the exact comment?

Was there a point deduction?

  #13  
Old 08-05-2015, 03:20 PM
MaxWT MaxWT is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cambridge, Ohio
Posts: 53
Default

The comment was just "poor paint". I had just touched it up.

Yes, there was significant point reduction.

Thanks for the reply. MaxWT

  #14  
Old 08-05-2015, 04:08 PM
My442 My442 is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 595
Default

Smalls and A arms were dipped in a tank of water that had paint floating on the top.

No primer was used.

The chassis was built upside down, and a very light mist of cheap black paint was sprayed on it before it was flipped over for the body mounting.

This is what I saw at the Framingham GM plant in 1972 when I worked on the assembly line.

The amount of TLC these cars received was minimal, on a good day.

  #15  
Old 08-05-2015, 05:09 PM
MaxWT MaxWT is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cambridge, Ohio
Posts: 53
Default

My 442,

I'm not surprised about the way these frames were painted. It's good to hear confirmation from someone who was there.

Thanks!

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:39 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017