| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Social Groups |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I have a friend looking at a 79TA SE 400 4 speed and am wondering if there should be a code on the trim tag under the hood for the Pontiac 400 engine (W72 ) or (M21) for 4 speed?
All it has is CC1 for T roof and Y84 for SE. So is the only way to identify the Pontiac 400 would be the Z in the VIN? Thanks to all who respond. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
This is a Norwood built car.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
The VIN would be the only way for sure to see if it was a Pontiac 400.
(PHS would confirm it also)
__________________
John Wallace - johnta1 Pontiac Power RULES !!! www.wallaceracing.com Winner of Top Class at Pontiac Nationals, 2004 Cordova Winner of Quick 16 At Ames 2004 Pontiac Tripower Nats KRE's MR-1 - 1st 5 second Pontiac block ever! W.E.C moment "Every man has a right to his own opinion, but no man has a right to be wrong in his facts." "People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoid." – Socrates |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Z would confirm 400 4 speed in 79 as the letter was not used for any other drivetrain that year
__________________
1972 Formula 455HO 1979 W72 Fire Am 1975 455 4 speed TA |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Wouldn't you want to look for PWH stamping on the Block in case engine had been changed ???
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yep.
But he asked about the VIN. Someone could put a 400 (PWH) in it and called it a 400 TA? If it is a 'Z' code then he should check to see if everything else is numbers matching still.
__________________
John Wallace - johnta1 Pontiac Power RULES !!! www.wallaceracing.com Winner of Top Class at Pontiac Nationals, 2004 Cordova Winner of Quick 16 At Ames 2004 Pontiac Tripower Nats KRE's MR-1 - 1st 5 second Pontiac block ever! W.E.C moment "Every man has a right to his own opinion, but no man has a right to be wrong in his facts." "People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoid." – Socrates |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yes, I didn't read it correctly,
|
| Reply |
|
|