Pontiac - Street No question too basic here!

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-01-2024, 10:39 PM
besserspat besserspat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Montreal
Posts: 240
Default To "Hybrid-ize" with Solid Rollers or Not This XFI Lobed Hydraulic Cam ?

Hey guys , I am the one who bought JLMounce's old custom KRE HR comp cam.

This cam was custom ground for KRE using 232-238 dur @050 lobes from from Comp's XFI , respectively the intake and exhaust lobes are #13081 b and #13141 b.

Got tired of searching for a used magnum lobed Stump puller, want to run hydrid set-up using Comp's Endure-X solid roller lifters I already have. I just want to finish my engine so pulled the trigger on this one.

This is going in my new 461 Stroker, 9.5 CR and 260 CFM @ .600 SD performance CNC #46 Irons. Cleaned up Holley SD intake and Q-jet. ( while I wait for my aluminum 71' HO intake to get done)

I plan on running HS 1.65 rockers .

So you cam and valvetrain gurus in the house:

-Do you consider the XFI TOO aggressive to run it Hydrid ?

-Should I just buy garden variety Hydraulic roller lifters for this somewhat mild street cam?

Its just that I have the Endure X lifters already and really dont mind setting valve lash since most my other cars are running Solid flats.

BTW here you have the cam specs and two screen shots of Comp's catalog for XFI lobes , My lobes are the one at the bottom at the page , (red arrow) intensity @ 200 are 156 and 160 respectively.

Thanks
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	CAM 232 238.jpg
Views:	510
Size:	79.9 KB
ID:	636225   Click image for larger version

Name:	232 lobes XFI.jpg
Views:	506
Size:	91.1 KB
ID:	636226   Click image for larger version

Name:	238 Lobes XFI.jpg
Views:	492
Size:	53.2 KB
ID:	636227  


Last edited by besserspat; 07-01-2024 at 11:32 PM.
  #2  
Old 07-01-2024, 10:50 PM
Jay S's Avatar
Jay S Jay S is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Nebraska City, Nebraska
Posts: 2,584
Default

The XFI is a bit aggressive for aluminum heads as a hybrid. It will work fine with your 46 iron heads, the expansion rate on the engine won’t effect the lash as much.


Last edited by Jay S; 07-01-2024 at 11:01 PM.
The Following User Says Thank You to Jay S For This Useful Post:
  #3  
Old 07-02-2024, 06:17 AM
Formulajones's Avatar
Formulajones Formulajones is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 11,920
Default

Looking at garden variety hydraulic roller lifters is where people get into trouble.
If you go the hydraulic route spend the dough and get hylift Johnson's.
Right now they are hard to obtain of course and be prepared for sticker shock, but if you want something durable with consistent bleed down rates that don't cause lash problems it's what ya need. Other wise you'll just be another guy in here complaining about sewing machine noise, tickers, and the like.

__________________
2019 Pontiac Heaven class winner

https://youtu.be/XqEydRRRwqE
The Following User Says Thank You to Formulajones For This Useful Post:
  #4  
Old 07-02-2024, 06:40 AM
grivera's Avatar
grivera grivera is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Just south of Baltimore
Posts: 5,871
Default

Or you can try the Comp Evolution HR lifters - they seem to be a good part.

__________________
Will Rivera

'69 Firebird, 400/461, 290 Eddy D-Ports, HR 230/236, 4l80E, 8.5 Rear, 3.55 gears
'69 LeMans Vert, XS 350, #47 heads, TH400, 10 Bolt 3.23 gears, work in progress
‘66 Lemans, 455, 310 KRE D-Ports, HR 236/245, TH400, GV OD, 12 bolt 3.73 gears - see it here:
https://youtu.be/RP_s1wJKm_Y?si=K0NZxoTyaGcj8Dcb

Last edited by grivera; 07-02-2024 at 07:39 AM.
The Following User Says Thank You to grivera For This Useful Post:
  #5  
Old 07-02-2024, 06:43 AM
Formulajones's Avatar
Formulajones Formulajones is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 11,920
Default

Yes forgot to mention those. Not only are they priced more in line with everything else they also (so far) have excellent reviews. Plus they are readily available unlike the hylifts.

__________________
2019 Pontiac Heaven class winner

https://youtu.be/XqEydRRRwqE
The Following User Says Thank You to Formulajones For This Useful Post:
  #6  
Old 07-02-2024, 11:41 AM
napster's Avatar
napster napster is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 787
Default

Agree on the Comp Evolution lifters. Had them installed on my 433 and they are quiet and smoothed out the engine.

The Following User Says Thank You to napster For This Useful Post:
  #7  
Old 07-02-2024, 12:17 PM
rolling money pits's Avatar
rolling money pits rolling money pits is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,662
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by napster View Post
Agree on the Comp Evolution lifters. Had them installed on my 433 and they are quiet and smoothed out the engine.
I don’t want to derail the op too much.

What heads do you have and what length pushrods did you end up with? My adjustable PR is based on iron heads with flat tappets, so not sure if I’d need a different one if going to the evo’s. Thx

__________________
costs too much
  #8  
Old 07-02-2024, 02:12 PM
napster's Avatar
napster napster is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 787
Default

RMP,
I answered this for someone else and I be darned if I can find it. I'm doing this from memory hope it's right. My mechanic indicated he started with 8.5 inch PR and didn't like it and went with 9 inch PR. PR has a .008 thousandths wall chrome moly. The heads are cast iron and the cam is HR. Hope the info helps out, but have many variables involved.

  #9  
Old 07-03-2024, 02:38 PM
besserspat besserspat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Montreal
Posts: 240
Default

After looking atbthe cam lobes in detail I really think such baby lobe can take solid rollers on a iron headed engine. Ill jeep an eye on em regularly dor the first year and mostly loosen them all each winters to save the springs.

Speaking of springs what you guys think , mu current springs are 1.700 installed height. Something like 170 on the seat and 370-390 on the nose once broken in?

I may explore the beehive world also if someone has played with this already. That engine should be done by 5500-5600.

Peter

  #10  
Old 07-03-2024, 02:49 PM
besserspat besserspat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Montreal
Posts: 240
Default

After looking at the lobes in detail I really think such baby lobe can take solid rollers on a iron headed engine. Ill jeep an eye on em regularly dor the first year and mostly loosen them all each winters to save the springs.

Speaking of springs what you guys think , mu current springs are 1.700 installed height. Something like 170 on the seat and 370-390 on the nose once broken in?

I may explore the beehive world also if someone has played with this already. That engine should be done by 5500-5600.

Peter

  #11  
Old 07-03-2024, 03:02 PM
JLMounce JLMounce is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Greeley, Colorado
Posts: 4,540
Send a message via AIM to JLMounce
Default

If you take a look at the data overview of the XFI lobes from the master lobe catalog, Comp does state the lobes were developed specifically for beehive springs.

That said, I did not have beehives on my engine and I typically spun it to around 5600 rpm. I never appeared to have any stability issues with the hydraulic roller lifters in place.

__________________
-Jason
1969 Pontiac Firebird
The Following User Says Thank You to JLMounce For This Useful Post:
  #12  
Old 07-03-2024, 06:54 PM
besserspat besserspat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Montreal
Posts: 240
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JLMounce View Post
If you take a look at the data overview of the XFI lobes from the master lobe catalog, Comp does state the lobes were developed specifically for beehive springs.

That said, I did not have beehives on my engine and I typically spun it to around 5600 rpm. I never appeared to have any stability issues with the hydraulic roller lifters in place.


Do you remember what springs, and installed height you ran? But If I run solid lifter Ill need a bit stiffer springs compred to your Hydraulic lifters.

This is really a baby cam

  #13  
Old 07-03-2024, 07:05 PM
tom s tom s is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: long beach ca usa
Posts: 19,428
Default

Comp told me 200 on a he seats with solid rollers.Tom

The Following User Says Thank You to tom s For This Useful Post:
  #14  
Old 07-03-2024, 08:24 PM
besserspat besserspat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Montreal
Posts: 240
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tom s View Post
Comp told me 200 on a he seats with solid rollers.Tom
Thanks Tom.

  #15  
Old 07-03-2024, 08:42 PM
Jay S's Avatar
Jay S Jay S is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Nebraska City, Nebraska
Posts: 2,584
Default

I would not consider beehives unless you use HR lifters.

You only need to increase the seat pressure as a hybrid if you want to run a lot of lash, more lash, more seat pressure, and your not going to want to run much lash with that XFI cam, it is too aggressive off the seat, the lash ramp on the closing side is pretty short, and not that big of a cam. You loose duration with more lash.

On one of my hybrids with iron heads I run 150 on the seat and just over 410 over the nose (413 spring rate) .630”lift. I zero lash the intakes when cold, just have some friction when you turn the pushrods, then I run .005” lash on the exhausts. It tightens up some when hot. It operated very quietly, you can not tell it has a roller cam in it, the red line on it is 7500. It is pretty high strung, and a much less aggressive cam profile than an XFI.

For that small XFI cam I would shoot for 160 lbs and just under 400 over the nose and 1.65 rocker as a hybrid, and use a dual spring. With HR lifters you would be happier with beehives.


Last edited by Jay S; 07-03-2024 at 09:26 PM.
  #16  
Old 07-03-2024, 09:12 PM
JLMounce JLMounce is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Greeley, Colorado
Posts: 4,540
Send a message via AIM to JLMounce
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by besserspat View Post
Do you remember what springs, and installed height you ran? But If I run solid lifter Ill need a bit stiffer springs compred to your Hydraulic lifters.

This is really a baby cam
They are the springs that KRE setup for me. Don't quote me on this but I believe that they use Crower springs with something like 140 on the seat. No idea on install height, but I would assume somewhere around 1.7" My pushrods were on the shorter side at 8.7"

And yes, it's a baby cam.

__________________
-Jason
1969 Pontiac Firebird
The Following User Says Thank You to JLMounce For This Useful Post:
  #17  
Old 07-03-2024, 09:22 PM
besserspat besserspat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Montreal
Posts: 240
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay S View Post
I would not consider beehives unless you use HR lifters.

You only need to increase the seat pressure as a hybrid if you want to run a lot of lash, more lash, more seat pressure, and your not going to want to run much lash with that XFI cam, it is too aggressive off the seat, the lash ramp on the closing side is pretty short, and not that big of a cam. You loose duration with more lash.

On one of my hybrids with iron heads I run 150 on the seat and just over 410 over the nose (413 spring rate) .630”lift. I zero lash the intakes when cold, just have some friction when you turn the pushrods, then I run .005” lash on the exhausts. It tightens up some when hot.

For that small XFI cam I would shoot for 160 lbs and just under 400 over the nose and 1.65 rocker as a hybrid, and use a dual spring. With HR lifter you would be happier with beehives.
I truly appreciate the insignt Jay, My heads have Comp's 995 springs currently installed at 1.700, installed at 1.600 they would be more like 150-155 lbs but maybe run into coil bind and they are probably a little tired.

What would you recommend for valvesprings, for 80% street.

Peter.

  #18  
Old 07-03-2024, 10:37 PM
tom s tom s is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: long beach ca usa
Posts: 19,428
Default

FWI,first of all the cam makers suggest if you want solid rollers get a tight lash solid roller cam and NOT use a hyd roller cam.Its a crutch.Also to error on the high side of spring pressures.Your choice.Tom

  #19  
Old 07-04-2024, 12:14 AM
Jay S's Avatar
Jay S Jay S is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Nebraska City, Nebraska
Posts: 2,584
Default

You would probably be on the high end of pressures like Tom is saying anyway, because the 1.7 IH isn’t really enough room to run 1.65HS rockers on that cam. It will end up around .610” lift with those rockers. There are some nice street springs you could run but they are near $500, used on LS platforms and gen3 hemi’s. About the cheapest spring at a 1.7 IH I can think of is a PAC-1200, would be plenty of spring on that, more than it needs. I think about 150 seat and 425 max.

An ideal spring with the 1.65HS rockers and that cam as a hybrid for the steeet is something like a compcams 26925 or Howard’s 98441 with the installed height set at 1.75”. I suppose you could adjust that with a +.050” keeper or retainer.

I am not trying to push this either way, Hybrid or HR lifter. Just offering info. My hybrids are not worth even comparing, to much is different.


Last edited by Jay S; 07-04-2024 at 12:21 AM.
The Following User Says Thank You to Jay S For This Useful Post:
  #20  
Old 07-04-2024, 12:44 AM
Jay S's Avatar
Jay S Jay S is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Nebraska City, Nebraska
Posts: 2,584
Default

I have a nice set of 2347 Hylift Johnson HR lifters if you could keep it on a budget with an decent HR lifter. I’d gladly work out something trade them for comp SR’s, I do a lot more SR’s than HR’s. I have extra sets of HR’s.

The Following User Says Thank You to Jay S For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:48 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017