Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 10-22-2014, 05:20 PM
NYGTO's Avatar
NYGTO NYGTO is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 537
Default

Oh I see, thank you John. I don't have a BHC as yet. I have to order from PHS.

Any idea if some cars stripes where brush painted?

  #22  
Old 10-22-2014, 06:07 PM
John V. John V. is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,748
Default

No, sorry. I'm a '64 guy. Don't have to worry about pinstripes.

But I recall lots of threads about '65 pinstripes. Pontiac Plant used the Buegler tool, pic of the set-up has been posted in this forum.

Pretty sure other Plants did it differently and pix of original cars/stripes have been posted comparing the various appearance differences.

  #23  
Old 10-22-2014, 08:14 PM
Tom Vaught's Avatar
Tom Vaught Tom Vaught is offline
Boost Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The United States of America
Posts: 31,304
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John V. View Post
Just to be clear, the '64 KC & Balt PHS docs do match the actual builds, only problem is, PHS does not know how to decode them. In the past, they tried to decode them same as they would a '64 Pontiac Plant Manifest record which resulted in nonsensical decodes for KC & Balt records and that decode didn't match the build. Not a fault of the manifest record, just an error by the guy decoding them.
Thanks John for the clarification. Helps me on that deal.

Explains why the Decodes (from The Pontiac Lady) match up perfectly and the PHS decodes did not.

Tom V.

__________________
"Engineers do stuff for reasons" Tom Vaught

Despite small distractions, there are those who will go Forward, Learning, Sharing Knowledge, Doing what they can to help others move forward.
  #24  
Old 10-22-2014, 08:54 PM
Option 382's Avatar
Option 382 Option 382 is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 359
Default

NYGTO, early Pontiac plant builds did use hand brush pinstripes. I thought your black 65 has this hand brush pinstripe. I think PON plant was the only plant to use this method and later that plant adapted to the other plant's methods.

  #25  
Old 10-23-2014, 06:55 AM
Keith Seymore's Avatar
Keith Seymore Keith Seymore is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Motor City
Posts: 8,194
Default

...

http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...ight=pinstripe

http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...ight=pinstripe

http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...ight=pinstripe

http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...ight=pinstripe

http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...ight=pinstripe


__________________
'63 LeMans Convertible
'63 Grand Prix
'65 GTO - original, unrestored, Dad was original owner, 5000 original mile Royal Pontiac factory racer
'74 Chevelle - original owner, 9.85 @ 136 mph besthttp://www.superchevy.com/features/s...hevy-chevelle/
My Pontiac Story: http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...d.php?t=560524
"Intro from an old Assembly Plant Guy":http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=342926
  #26  
Old 10-23-2014, 08:57 AM
NYGTO's Avatar
NYGTO NYGTO is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 537
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Option 382 View Post
NYGTO, early Pontiac plant builds did use hand brush pinstripes. I thought your black 65 has this hand brush pinstripe. I think PON plant was the only plant to use this method and later that plant adapted to the other plant's methods.
No not by brush for my car. The build is 3rd week of May if this helps.

  #27  
Old 10-23-2014, 09:01 AM
NYGTO's Avatar
NYGTO NYGTO is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 537
Default

The pictures I posted were linked by cell phone and look best on that medium. Unfortunately they are disproportionate and very terribly on a computer monitor.

http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...ight=pinstripe

  #28  
Old 05-15-2015, 07:23 PM
60sstuff's Avatar
60sstuff 60sstuff is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 2,801
Default 65 GTO Code "Discrepancy"

Quote:
Originally Posted by John V. View Post
Tom, the KC & Balt manifest sales coding difference only applies to '64. The PHS records for '65 are the Billing History Cards that Pontiac coded same for all Plants.

The "discrepancy" is the code for the Cordova Top color on the Data Plate. NYGTO, correct me if I am wrong, but the '65 BHC will show the COLOR coded for the Black Cordova Top as "2", as the '65 BHC was coded in "Pontiac-speak" regardless of the Plant where built.

Leads hobbyists to think there may have been a top color change during the build when in fact, the Data Plate "6" indicates Black Top, same as the BHC "2" does.

In '64, the KC and Balt manifest records from PHS are coded in "Chevy-speak" so the KC & Balt manifests shows the same "6" for Black Top as KC & Balt coded on their Data Plates for Black Top.

Just to be clear, the '64 KC & Balt PHS docs do match the actual builds, only problem is, PHS does not know how to decode them. In the past, they tried to decode them same as they would a '64 Pontiac Plant Manifest record which resulted in nonsensical decodes for KC & Balt records and that decode didn't match the build. Not a fault of the manifest record, just an error by the guy decoding them.
A 65 GTO built in Baltimore - Mayfair Maize with Black Cordova Top.

Data Plate shows Y6

BHC on this car shows "2" just as John spells out above. It's really a Y2 in "Pontiac Speak".

All Factory Original including top LH and RH plastic gutter molding.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	1-7-15 (20).jpg
Views:	44
Size:	71.4 KB
ID:	397850   Click image for larger version

Name:	1-7-15 (23).jpg
Views:	38
Size:	72.1 KB
ID:	397851   Click image for larger version

Name:	1-7-15 (24).jpg
Views:	35
Size:	123.6 KB
ID:	397852   Click image for larger version

Name:	1-7-15 (25).jpg
Views:	34
Size:	75.3 KB
ID:	397853   Click image for larger version

Name:	1-7-15 (26).jpg
Views:	33
Size:	52.2 KB
ID:	397854  


__________________
1) 65 GTO Survivor. 43,440 Original Miles. “Factory” Mayfair Maize Paint with Black Pinstripe, Black Cordova Top, Black Interior, OEM Numbers Matching Powertrain. Purchased from the Lady that bought it new. Baltimore Built (11A).
2) 66 GTO Survivor. “Factory” Cameo Ivory Paint with Red Pinstripe, Red Interior. OEM Numbers Matching Powertrain. Tri-Power (OEM Vacuum Linkage), Automatic "YR" code (1759 Produced). Fremont Built (01B), with the Rare 614 Option.

Last edited by 60sstuff; 05-15-2015 at 07:36 PM.
  #29  
Old 05-17-2015, 03:39 PM
John62 John62 is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 560
Default

So if I look at my 65 Fremont built in first week May, and across from ACC I see 53523 all in a row no spaces and no letters what does this mean and how does it match my PHS?

  #30  
Old 05-17-2015, 09:36 PM
Geeto-Tiger Geeto-Tiger is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Motown
Posts: 126
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 60sstuff View Post
A 65 GTO built in Baltimore - Mayfair Maize with Black Cordova Top.

Data Plate shows Y6

BHC on this car shows "2" just as John spells out above. It's really a Y2 in "Pontiac Speak".

All Factory Original including top LH and RH plastic gutter molding.
My 2 65 GTO's have stainless drip rail retainers for the vinyl top. When did they go to plastic? Also, is this retainer reproduced?

  #31  
Old 05-17-2015, 09:43 PM
Option 382's Avatar
Option 382 Option 382 is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 359
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John62 View Post
So if I look at my 65 Fremont built in first week May, and across from ACC I see 53523 all in a row no spaces and no letters what does this mean and how does it match my PHS?
Your large number is the manifest sequence number spanning across the model year internal to the Femont plant.

  #32  
Old 05-18-2015, 07:26 AM
Keith Seymore's Avatar
Keith Seymore Keith Seymore is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Motor City
Posts: 8,194
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John62 View Post
So if I look at my 65 Fremont built in first week May, and across from ACC I see 53523 all in a row no spaces and no letters what does this mean and how does it match my PHS?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Option 382 View Post
Your large number is the manifest sequence number spanning across the model year internal to the Fremont plant.
Agree - and you won't find it on the PHS.

It should appear on the original build sheet, if you have that.

K

__________________
'63 LeMans Convertible
'63 Grand Prix
'65 GTO - original, unrestored, Dad was original owner, 5000 original mile Royal Pontiac factory racer
'74 Chevelle - original owner, 9.85 @ 136 mph besthttp://www.superchevy.com/features/s...hevy-chevelle/
My Pontiac Story: http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...d.php?t=560524
"Intro from an old Assembly Plant Guy":http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=342926
  #33  
Old 05-18-2015, 10:01 AM
John62 John62 is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 560
Default

I do not have the build sheet but I see some talk of some data tags having some of the accessories stamped and some comments of some of the cars from Fremont not matching the PHS so I was just checking. thanks.

  #34  
Old 05-19-2015, 12:49 PM
60sstuff's Avatar
60sstuff 60sstuff is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 2,801
Default You are Correct!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Geeto-Tiger View Post
My 2 65 GTO's have stainless drip rail retainers for the vinyl top. When did they go to plastic? Also, is this retainer reproduced?
A closer look at the "flexible retainer" on my 65 looks to be stainless.

It has a small lip that fits under the drip molding.

Thanks!
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Z-65 140.jpg
Views:	37
Size:	41.3 KB
ID:	398210  

__________________
1) 65 GTO Survivor. 43,440 Original Miles. “Factory” Mayfair Maize Paint with Black Pinstripe, Black Cordova Top, Black Interior, OEM Numbers Matching Powertrain. Purchased from the Lady that bought it new. Baltimore Built (11A).
2) 66 GTO Survivor. “Factory” Cameo Ivory Paint with Red Pinstripe, Red Interior. OEM Numbers Matching Powertrain. Tri-Power (OEM Vacuum Linkage), Automatic "YR" code (1759 Produced). Fremont Built (01B), with the Rare 614 Option.
  #35  
Old 05-20-2015, 01:46 AM
Geeto-Tiger Geeto-Tiger is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Motown
Posts: 126
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 60sstuff View Post
A closer look at the "flexible retainer" on my 65 looks to be stainless.

It has a small lip that fits under the drip molding.

Thanks!
Thanks for the picture. It looks like the drip rail aluminum trim actually holds the retainer in place. Good to know before I assemble mine. It also looks like the roof might be spot welded to the structure below it. I am in the process of deciding if I should replace my roof or use lead to fill in some rust holes. The roof panel should come off after I drill out the spot welds.

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:53 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017