Pontiac - Street No question too basic here!

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-01-2018, 10:20 PM
alanmay0 alanmay0 is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Texas
Posts: 612
Default Blocking off exhaust from intake manifold

Hello I have a 1967 GTO and live in Texas where it is hot most of the time. Thus I do not need the carburetor heated by the exhaust flowing through the intake manifold and under the carburetor. Does someone make a intake manifold gasket that blocks off the exhaust ports that go through the intake manifold? Or has anyone figured out another way to solve this problem. Trying to keep the paint on the center of the intake manifold.

thanks
alan

  #2  
Old 02-02-2018, 12:31 AM
Mister Pontiac's Avatar
Mister Pontiac Mister Pontiac is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: North Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,057
Default

Yes, the gaskets are available. They may help in preventing the paint from burning off of the crossover, but I don’t think you’ll see much benefit beyond that. Once the engine fully warms up and reaches temperature equilibrium, the heat will soak the intake all the same.

If you really want a performance increase and want to rid the problem of crossover paint burn, you will need to fill the crossovers with aluminum.

Hope that helps.

__________________
Eric "Todd" Mitten

'74 Bonneville 4dr Sedan (455/TH400/2.93 open)
'72 LeMans GT (455/M-13/3.23 [8.5"] posi)
'71 GTO Hardtop (400/TH400/3.07 12 bolt posi)
‘71 GTO Convertible (455HO/TH400/3.23 posi)
'67 GTO Coupe (455/ST-10/2.93 posi)
'67 Tempest Wagon (428/TH400/2.56 posi)

Deuteronomy 8:3
  #3  
Old 02-02-2018, 12:45 AM
WDCreech's Avatar
WDCreech WDCreech is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Anchorage, Ak. USA
Posts: 2,558
Default

The block-off gaskets won't last very long. I cut some block-offs from stainless steel pancake turners and they burned through over one summer. It would be best to fill the joined center intake passage in each head with molten aluminum so you would get no exhaust reversion between cylinders. If you have enough old pistons to melt, you can fill the intake too.

__________________
Bill

64 GTO, tube chassis w/606" IA tall deck, PG & a pro geared Fab 9". 2750 lbs.
8.2550@164.17-1/4, 5.2901@131.97-1/8, 1.1981-60-ft. 8/10/08

  #4  
Old 02-02-2018, 08:56 AM
Cliff R's Avatar
Cliff R Cliff R is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Mount Vernon, Ohio 43050
Posts: 18,023
Default

Bad idea anyhow, the divorced choke will not longer work correctly, and the engine will not perform well until all the parts fully heat soak anyhow.

I would not block the crossovers at the gaskets, but it will help to block the small holes at each end of the "channel" directly under the carburetors. Although the engineers meant well with that particular intake, todays fuels don't do well with the carburetor being heated up that much and we get quite a few complaints from folks using those intake manifolds.

The complaints always come in here during the hottest months of the years, we seldom hear anything about that deal in the cooler months.........FWIW......Cliff

__________________
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If you can read this in English, thank a Veteran!
https://cliffshighperformance.com/
73 Ventura, SOLD 455, 3740lbs, 11.30's at 120mph, 1977 Pontiac Q-jet, HO intake, HEI, 10" converter, 3.42 gears, DOT's, 7.20's at 96mph and still WAY under the roll bar rule. Best ET to date 7.18 at 97MPH (1/8th mile),
  #5  
Old 02-02-2018, 01:46 PM
Blued and Painted's Avatar
Blued and Painted Blued and Painted is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Granby Colorado
Posts: 2,431
Default

It must be quite the fireball even at idle speed being the crossover passage starts just behind the exhaust valve x 4 cylinders.
Intake temp must be quite the balancing act with incoming cool air and varying exhaust temps at different load levels.
Next set of iron heads (on the bench) think I'll try to install a 3/8 steel tube while filling the ex crossover and only connect 1 cyl per head.
I'm sure an electric choke would still be needed.

__________________
Bull Nose Formula-461, 6x-4, Q-jet, HEI, TH400, 8.5 3.08, superslowjunk

Last edited by Blued and Painted; 02-02-2018 at 01:57 PM.
  #6  
Old 02-02-2018, 02:01 PM
dataway's Avatar
dataway dataway is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Greenfield TN
Posts: 8,945
Default

For better or worse, what I'm trying on mine is a SS plate cut to fit in the left side intake gasket cross over spot (68 intake) and leaving the right side open so that the divorced choke gets some heat.

In mid-68 they did away with the flapper valve on the exhaust manifold that forced exhaust through the intake, and instead went with the thermostatic controlled valve on the air cleaner snorkel to an air pre-heater on the left side exhaust manifold....which I will have installed. Since I'll never be driving the car in the winter, I'm thinking this will get things warm enough in a reasonable amount of time.

After they removed the flapper valve in 68 ... I guess the engineers just figured natural exhaust turbulence, or pressure mis-match between exhaust manifolds would move enough exhaust through the intake.

  #7  
Old 02-02-2018, 02:38 PM
Will Will is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Pugetopolis
Posts: 5,297
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blued and Painted View Post
It must be quite the fireball even at idle speed being the crossover passage starts just behind the exhaust valve x 4 cylinders.
Intake temp must be quite the balancing act with incoming cool air and varying exhaust temps at different load levels.
Next set of iron heads (on the bench) think I'll try to install a 3/8 steel tube while filling the ex crossover and only connect 1 cyl per head.
I'm sure an electric choke would still be needed.
Instead of trying to finagle a steel tube in there, just drill through once the crossovers are filled.

Dave Bisschop told me that's what he does on heads where some choke function or heat is needed. Just make sure you get the angle right so it goes into one of the ports and not the head.

__________________
----------------------------
'72 Formula 400 Lucerne Blue, Blue Deluxe interior - My first car!
'73 Firebird 350/4-speed Black on Black, mix & match.
  #8  
Old 02-02-2018, 02:54 PM
HWYSTR455's Avatar
HWYSTR455 HWYSTR455 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Manassas, VA
Posts: 14,792
Default

Filling with aluminum you still get heat soak.

If you want to prevent the paint from burning, do the same what folks do with the exhaust ports, paint first with some Eastwood exhaust paint or other similar product, before you lay down the color.

https://www.eastwood.com/paints/hi-t...st-paints.html

Pretty sure the POR-15 high heat paint is the same thing:

https://www.por15.com/POR-15-High-Temp_p_104.html

It's always best to etch before you paint, but you don't have to, just lasts longer if you do. Use a good quality engine paint too, I like Dupli-color ceramic.

.

__________________
.

1970 GTO Judge Tribute Pro-Tour Project 535 IA2
http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...d.php?t=760624
1971 Trans Am 463, 315cfm E-head Sniper XFlow EFI, TKO600 extreme, 9", GW suspension, Baer brakes, pro tour car
https://forums.maxperformanceinc.com...ght=procharger
Theme Song: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zKAS...ature=youtu.be
  #9  
Old 02-02-2018, 03:36 PM
grandam1979 grandam1979 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ohio, Findlay
Posts: 1,443
Default

I have blocked of many with the plates in the gasket set have never had one fail.

  #10  
Old 02-02-2018, 07:15 PM
dmac dmac is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,229
Default

Why not remove the crossover on a spare manifold and fill the heads? Keep your original manifold as good as new. I've seem photos posted of some excellent looking manifolds with the exhaust crossover removed. Plus it seems to me that it would increase the gap under the manifold, keeping it cooler in hot weather. I personally like a manual choke, but I grew up around cars that had them.

  #11  
Old 02-02-2018, 07:36 PM
shaker455's Avatar
shaker455 shaker455 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NH
Posts: 4,471
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by alanmay0 View Post
Hello I have a 1967 GTO and live in Texas where it is hot most of the time. Thus I do not need the carburetor heated by the exhaust flowing through the intake manifold and under the carburetor. Does someone make a intake manifold gasket that blocks off the exhaust ports that go through the intake manifold? Or has anyone figured out another way to solve this problem. Trying to keep the paint on the center of the intake manifold.

thanks
alan
Fel- Pro # 1233.

The fiber plates my burn thru over time and you might want to consider using a better material to close it off.

__________________
Carburetor building & modification services
Servicing the Pontiac community over 20 years
  #12  
Old 02-02-2018, 08:26 PM
Formulajones's Avatar
Formulajones Formulajones is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 10,896
Default

I went a different direction all together as an experiment of sorts.

I switched over to a RAIV manifold with a separate heat cross over. Still uses the divorce choke and all functions like factory. Wanted to experiment with pump gas, heat soak, hot temps and now cold temps.

Did this deal back early spring, drove it all summer in 100+ temps, and now this winter we've had overnight temps in the teens. So pretty cold morning starts, but the days warm up to 60's and 70's.

I've put 6,000 miles on this setup so far and happy to say it performs flawless. Divorce choke works just as it should, cold morning starts aren't a problem, but the cross over is a complete separate deal from the intake and last summer it showed no issues of heat soak. Running straight 91 pump gas.

I've found, for me, it's the best all around solution to pump gas heat soak, and still having a functional cross over and choke.

  #13  
Old 02-03-2018, 05:55 PM
Will Will is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Pugetopolis
Posts: 5,297
Default

The paint should not burn off the crossover on the manifold with the heads filled with aluminum. The manifold is only going to get up to the temperature of the engine when it's heat soaked, maybe a couple hundred degrees or so. The paint burns off because exhaust gases are over 1000 degrees.

Never had any sign of paint burning on my intake with filled crossovers.

__________________
----------------------------
'72 Formula 400 Lucerne Blue, Blue Deluxe interior - My first car!
'73 Firebird 350/4-speed Black on Black, mix & match.
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:49 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017