![]() |
Does 65 GTO / Lemans front license plate impede airflow at high speed?
Removing radiator to have it sealed up and improved by a local shop. While draining the coolant and removing lower hose it became obvious that the license plate & bracket hang down a solid 2.5 inches below the front bumper and would be blocking some airflow to the radiator at speed. At a minimum it would create unnecessary turbulence of the airflow.
Anyone ever play around with and without the plate or have a point of view on these topic? |
You have to be kidding. The front of your car is shape like a brick I don't think the lic. plate would much matter.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Trouble is it would be near impossible to measure with and without difference. |
Quote:
The majority of the air is entering through the upper grille and the bumper slots anyway. The fact that the plate is hanging down in open space (as opposed to a constrained space) also minimizes its effect. When the plate is blocking one of the upper openings then it becomes more of a contributor (like if you mounted it on top of the GTO emblem, for example). K |
2 Attachment(s)
A 65 front bumper looks similar to a 67.
Mounted the front plate with it hanging below the bumper opening. Two pics with the plate mounted. Red car is mine. |
I've been 135 with my front plate on :)
|
Remove the plate and you'll hit 137 !
|
The A/C cars have a radiator that hangs down 2 inchs lower and can be seen hanging below the bumper. In this case I bet it would have some affect on cooling.
|
1 Attachment(s)
Mine looks pretty much even with the bottom of the bumper:
|
2 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Jim - do you suppose you have the wrong bracket? K |
Quote:
|
1 Attachment(s)
I think this is what Pontiac originally intended.
http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...1&d=1452551404 |
Quote:
|
2 Attachment(s)
John, Chris you are correct. There is a pocket on the bracket that should be mounted at the bottom. The plate then slips into this pocket and is screwed in the lower 2 holes.
Keith, I respectfully suggest your plate might be mounted wrong or with a different bracket. I also remain convinced it disrupts airflow under the bumper. These pics should help. |
2 Attachment(s)
Very interesting.
I don't believe mine has ever been apart. A factory mistake on an early built car, perhap? (My car was built September 18th of 1964, in Pontiac Michigan). Ed's car has 4200 miles and has never been restored (March built Kansas City car). I can't comment on if any changes have been made to his car beyond that. K A couple pics of Ed's car with no plate attached: |
Quote:
K |
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Looks like there is precedence for mounting it "up high". K |
An air dam (on the core support, below the radiator) would negate any impact the plate would have on air flow, especially at speed. And it wouldn't have to be very big/much area.
. |
The end all to this dilemma...
While looking through old photo files for something I came across some old shots from a past club cruise and laughed when I saw this pic.
I forgot about this quick change front end treatment and thought it went well with this post ;) Don has owned his '65 since new so as anyone who has something that long they are bound to personalize it. He made an air-dam that he easily can put on and take off when he is in the mood for a change. http://i412.photobucket.com/albums/p...2010%20002.jpg |
There are no additional brackets on a '67, and the two mounting holes stamped in the bumper sets the plate high (as shown in the photo above of the '67 convertible). I would think the '65 would have been similar. Being overly fanatical and searching for the greatest cooling, I made a set of brackets to put the plate lower and keep the area between top and bottom of the bumper clear on my car. Probably didn't do a bit of good, but made me feel better.
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:25 AM. |