Quote:
Originally Posted by johnsma22
Anthropogenic global climate change may or may not be occurring. That's not the point. The point is that ALL of the evidence in support of it has now been called into question. Therefore, if we are going to be asked to subject our economy to limitations of so called green house emissions, then it is only prudent for us to ask for some actual scientific data to back up their claims. I suspect that should take a few decades for some REAL scientists to compile and quantify.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnsma22
Well Mike, it's time to stop talking and get busy voting! No partisanship here either. It's time to vote all the bums out, regardless of party affiliation. Anyone who now turns to the data in question as proof for their "green" agenda should be looked at with extreme skepticism.
Again, I'm not saying that man made climate change isn't happening. All I'm saying is that people who do believe that it's happening need to start from scratch with their research. Once they have some real science to present to us, then maybe we'll talk.
|
Well stated and I totally agree. I would add that data from either side should be viewed with extreme skepticism until there is an overwhelming breakthrough. Even then, policy tied to any break through should be minimal or non-existant until there is proof! I saw something this morning where a NOAA scientist stated that Global Warming is NOT a theory. Whatever lady.....