Thread: a new rearend
View Single Post
  #46  
Old 09-24-2023, 06:52 PM
HWYSTR455's Avatar
HWYSTR455 HWYSTR455 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Manassas, VA
Posts: 14,794
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by b-man View Post
No weight to speak of on the front axle and thar chassis really cannot transfer weight to the front axle in any appreciable amount if there were brakes up front. The 300 inch wheelbase isn’t likely to transfer much weight to the front axle.

Braking forces would twist the front axle out of the car if they did have brakes.

I used to drag race a 12-second VW with no front brakes, it stopped fine at over 105 mph after a run, of course this 1300 pound car was heavily rear weight biased.
Exactly. Bias.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaleO View Post
I think there is info here to consider. "Paragraph" four touches on greater rear bias as could be bad depending on how much more there is. ....
Yes, how much bias, that's what the formula/calculator helps determine, how much. Depending on the type of car, the intended purpose, there are more desirable front/rear ratios.

Another extreme example, you don't take a rail dragster on a road course.

Just because something 'works', doesn't mean it's optimal.

.

__________________
.

1970 GTO Judge Tribute Pro-Tour Project 535 IA2
http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...d.php?t=760624
1971 Trans Am 463, 315cfm E-head Sniper XFlow EFI, TKO600 extreme, 9", GW suspension, Baer brakes, pro tour car
https://forums.maxperformanceinc.com...ght=procharger
Theme Song: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zKAS...ature=youtu.be