| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Social Groups |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
looking for a 68-72 GTO with very nice body and paint , dont care about drivetrain, please REASONABLY PRICED. dont be like every other guy on ebay and want 40k for a bare bones 68! driver condition is good also. i have cahs and a trailer ready, CT,NY,NJ,PA,DE,MA
__________________
1971 ventura 455 12.04 @ 110 w/ crummy 1.69 60 ft - so far! NHRA super gas licence holder 9.31@145 @ frank hawleys in a 2000 firebird |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
72 455HO WW5 $27,500 54,000 original miles, 1 repaint.
__________________
Some guys they just give up living And start dying little by little, piece by piece, Some guys come home from work and wash up, And go racin' in the street. Bruce Springsteen - Racing In The Street - 1978 |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
GORGEOUS car, but i dont have that much cash lol. good luck with your sale
__________________
1971 ventura 455 12.04 @ 110 w/ crummy 1.69 60 ft - so far! NHRA super gas licence holder 9.31@145 @ frank hawleys in a 2000 firebird |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
heck you already got two sick a$$ed cars man! |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
only 1
i sold my 66 GTO pro street thats why im looking for another project
__________________
1971 ventura 455 12.04 @ 110 w/ crummy 1.69 60 ft - so far! NHRA super gas licence holder 9.31@145 @ frank hawleys in a 2000 firebird |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
that car was pureee bada$$
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
nothing yet?
__________________
1971 ventura 455 12.04 @ 110 w/ crummy 1.69 60 ft - so far! NHRA super gas licence holder 9.31@145 @ frank hawleys in a 2000 firebird Last edited by afx421; 05-09-2010 at 11:26 AM. Reason: wrong post |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Does it have to be a GTO?
__________________
1966 GTO 1969 Lemans Convertible- F.A.S.T. legal family cruiser. 12.59 on G70-14 Polyglas tires. 1.78 60' 1969 Bonneville Safari- cross country family cruiser. . 1979 Trans Am 400, 4-speed, 4 wheel disc. View from the drivers seat racing down Atco Raceway- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GhYDMdOEC7A Ride along in the other lane-http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mIzgpLtF_uw |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
no def not. you selling the tempest jeremy? lets talk at rent day. or just after
__________________
1971 ventura 455 12.04 @ 110 w/ crummy 1.69 60 ft - so far! NHRA super gas licence holder 9.31@145 @ frank hawleys in a 2000 firebird |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
i guess its impossible to have 13,000 dollars cash and a trailer and be able to find a pontiac body ( lemans,gto, firebird, ventura ) in nice shape and nice paint that can run in the 12s and be street driven
people still think the world is barret jackson! im starting to regret selling my pro street GTO . anyone want cash $$ for a street car that runs 12s or better please let me know. again - i have THIRTEEN thats all i have to spend. thanks.
__________________
1971 ventura 455 12.04 @ 110 w/ crummy 1.69 60 ft - so far! NHRA super gas licence holder 9.31@145 @ frank hawleys in a 2000 firebird |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Try to buy one and suddenly they are all big bucks again ![]() Sad thing is 99% of the cars in the $10-$13k range need to be restored if you look at them closely - years of hidden sins. Or they are clean body ugly color typical 350 cars with A/C, bench seats and presentable. Still $10k away from being a 12 second street/strip car. What I am seeing is it takes over $15k to touch a clean body with good colors and nice driveline and some waiting to find one. I feel the economy sucks - shouldn't toy prices drop? The days of a $5000 Lemans clean basic driver and $10,000 Lemans clean street/strip car are gone. Sad, so sad. |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi, I have a 68 GTO clone that was a tempest. It's a clean Arizona car minus the engine and tranny $4500 if your interested. It has all the GTO parts with it including a nice hideaway headlight setup. Call 315-749-8496.
Thanks Rob |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
I have a '68 GTO on ebay right now. Nice and straight rust free Arizona car with a very nice new paint job. I would take $9,000 for it w/o engine/tranny or $10,000 w/engine/tranny. My reserve is set at $12,000 so if you are interested, let me know and I will drop the reserve for you. You can email me at "justgoats at hotmail dot com" or call me at four eight zero 2392527.
I also have a '69 GTO that is 100% rust free and freshly painted (PPG base/clear) Matador Red-show quality mirror finish paintjob and a few 1970 GTOs. Also have a 1972 GTO with a mint body. The '68 was originally a manual transmission car. Cars are in Phoenix, Arizona. eBay item number for the 1968 GTO: 130393953096 |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
aye aye I wish arizona and the other side of the states wasn't so far for me!
|
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
1971 ventura 455 12.04 @ 110 w/ crummy 1.69 60 ft - so far! NHRA super gas licence holder 9.31@145 @ frank hawleys in a 2000 firebird |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
try this:
Item number: 230482079051 looks nice but read: been painted, gaps not great, bubbles, dash cap, wrong seats, wrong motor with no balls, has many needs but a nice driver as it sits , best thing is a 4 speed car. worth $8500 with probably a $13k reserve. How can you justify putting more money into it when it will always be a restored non-stock Lemans? Sorry - I'll leave your thread alone - just sharing your frustration and afraid to sell my project to look for the same thing you are.. Last edited by chief455; 06-05-2010 at 10:43 AM. |
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Good luck with your search!! Last edited by andrewT; 06-05-2010 at 01:43 PM. |
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
Item number: 230482079051
that was a good deal for $6k ! not "exactly" what we are looking for, but was worth it. At least they aren't all out their minds
|
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...%3D1&viewitem=
Seems like it went for the right price. You really can not show many decent 70-72 Lemans' or Tempests that have sold for more $7K in the last year. Car lots/dealers offering financing may be a different story.
__________________
Norm J |
| Reply |
|
|