| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Social Groups |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
I am getting ready to pull the trigger on a new fuel system for my GTO. First off, let me tell you that when I make mods to the car, I like to try to do it once and only once. Can't afford to keep on throwing money at the car over and over. My car is a 66 GTO convertible with a 455 and a custom built Q-Jet (in the process) which is replacing my tri-power. Anyway, the car see's no track time, just some serious rip and get street pounding.
Anyway, I will be sending the tank to the radiator shop to get a 1/2" bung installed at the bottom of the tank, one at the top of the tank and a new larger vent. From the back of the car, I was going to run 1/2" flexible line from the tank to the frame section located right before the rear wheel and then convert to 1/2" stainless tubing (0.028" wall tubing). Reason for the conversion to tubing is that I need to run the tubing through the frame (front of the car) along side of the 5/16" factory fuel line and the area where the fuel line pass THROUGH the frame looks to be too small to accommodate a 1/2" hose along with the 5/16" tubing. I plan to use the 5/16" tubing for either a bypass system like Cliff uses or vapor return line for a mechanical system. So, here are my choices: 1. Comp 140 electric back at the tank with a RobbMc pre-filter. Mount a RobbMc fuel pressure regulator at the motor and right before the regulator, insert a T in the line to recirculate some of the fuel back to the tank (Cliff's design). Run a RobbMc post filter. 2. RobbMc 1100 series mechanical pump up front with a RobbMc regulator. Run a RobbMc pre and post filter and install a vapor return fitting on the regulator to send back a small portion of the fuel to the tank to reduce possibility of vapor lock. Both options are a big investment for me and without any real experience with either option, I am in a deadlock situation. Electric pros and cons: + when plumbed properly, constant supply of cool fuel to the carb + remove clutter at the front of the motor except for the regulator. - Not as reliable??? Reports of people losing an electric pump without much warning. - electric draw on the alternator - even as small as it is, there is still drain on the system. Mechanical pros and cons: + Very reliable - not too many reports of the pump just dying. + the 1100 pump can be used with an external regulator, improving delivery and the ability to run lower pressures to keep from over driving the carb seat. +/- Can recirculate a small portion of fuel like the electric however the potential exists for heating the fuel - lots of equipment to fit in a small space by the motor. regulator will see some heat from the motor. - reports of some that run out of fuel on the top end. + Excellent customer support Am I over thinking this to the max??? Just want a reliable car that I can get in, hit the key and not have to worry about carrying around spare parts with me. Opinions welcomed. Thanks...
__________________
Skinned knuckles and empty wallet! Could I be any happier? 66 GTO Convertible. LS3-525 HP. Legend LGT700 5-speed, Wilwood 4-wheel disc brakes, Ridetech coil over front susp, PMT rear susp, Hotchkis bars, Billet Specialties 18" Dagger's (18X9 rear, 18X8 front). 2002 Ram Air WS.6 convertible Trans Am. Wife's car. |
|
|