[Anderson Port Development]

Originally Posted by Jeff Kinsler

Can't even compare two 2 builds.

... well, Fulton's car is obviously making more power, the MPH proves that, yes we've had our fair share of issues for sure, but ultimately you guys want to disect any piece of the build you choose and take away what the CV-1 engine is doing, and try to insinuate now the only reason it's faster is because of the carbs and drysump ?? ...

... you guys don't know anything about those carbs, we ran my spread dominator on this engine the last time it was dyno'd, it made 6 less hp and 8 more ft lbs ...

... now the real issue here is not even that, as if this nonsense isn't bad enough, there is and has been a lop-sided bias from you 'Haters' concerning CV-1's regardless of the topic, and everyone knows who you are, because most if not all of the same hater names are in just about every CV-1 thread there is, Fulton's car IS faster, and it certainly has not matched the MPH to our best ET, YET ...

... but you guys still wanna pick it apart and discredit the whole thing because of some parts, and Fulton is faster ??? ... has a single one of you jumped on Jack and his new combo ??? because he is slower and and recieved nothing like what Fulton's results have, not even close ... and he went slower ?? ... but you guys will say i'm wrong, that there is no bias here like always ...

... Jeff, you said you felt we'd go 7.40's or so before, and the car is showing that you might have been correct, i don't disagree with you there, but it's been posted by Marcella that new combo's are a pain to get dialed in, and that reference was to Langer's N/A engine, there's a little more to a 2 stage N20 combo wouldn't you say ??? ...

... if you guys are so fair, so unbias, then why haven't we been given that kind of quarter or understanding ??? ... heck, Jack was on the track i think a full season before we were wasn't he ?? ...

... and i'm not trying to blow you up here Jeff, i'm speaking honestly ...