| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Social Groups |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#1141
|
||||
|
||||
|
[QUOTE=BruceWilkie;5632580][QUOTE=PAUL K;5632409]
Lets start here and get back to that^^^... http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...postcount=1010 I followed with... http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...postcount=1013 Before next reply to me paul posts this... http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...postcount=1026 I respond to post 1026 http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...postcount=1034 Your response... http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...postcount=1038 My reply... http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...postcount=1091 pauls reply.(note still no answer to the question in post 1034^^^) http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...postcount=1092 paul additionaly says... http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...postcount=1099 Quote:
If I was anti CV1 I would point out that DF ran 7.7 with his Ehead combo roughly six years ago. Fast forward with a new build and much better technology along with improved carburetors and a dry sump he has ran 7.6. I understand that is with less nitrous but we have no idea if the combination will respond to more nitrous favorably. I would also point out that he has a top notch chassis with big tires and only has Cosgrove's Ehead combination covered by a tenth or so and Cosgrove's chassis is leaf springs, Cal-track and smaller tires. Cosgrove's car is ten times more "street" than DF's car, I've seen both cars in person.. I would also point out that DF has Kinsler's much smaller cid Ehead combination covered by a tenth or so and Kinsler has a small tire, Cal-Track leaf spring suspension 1/8 mile car using a single four and plate ...not two fours and a dual fogger. But since I'm not a CV1 hater I won't mention the above. I apologize to Cosgrove and Kinsler for mentioning their names but I didn't really see a way around it. Both their cars are bad azz and do the Pontiac community proud. |
|
#1142
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#1143
|
||||
|
||||
![]() ![]() :
|
|
#1144
|
||||
|
||||
|
[QUOTE=PAUL K;5632607][QUOTE=BruceWilkie;5632580]
Quote:
|
|
#1145
|
||||
|
||||
|
Again, with the facts. Stop it!
|
|
#1146
|
||||
|
||||
|
Bruce I didn't answer this question. I thought you were being sarcastic.
|
|
#1147
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
#1148
|
|||
|
|||
|
In Fultons defense, I believe there is a lot left in it. Its only been down the track a hand and a half full of times at best I believe... I personally believe the car is going to go low 7's based On what I know... Fulton is not a boastful guy and doesn't show his hand... Just an educated opinion on my end..
|
|
#1149
|
|||
|
|||
|
Shouldn't you be in the garage trying to figure out why your 50k motor is a slug?
|
|
#1150
|
|||
|
|||
|
PAUL K for president!
![]()
|
|
#1151
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I don't think DF needs a defense. It's his cheering squad that's the problem. |
|
#1152
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Jim would be the one to say what potential he had in mind at the time. Pure speculation if I throw out a number. There has been a lot of port deveopment basd on popular engine sizes and purposes. Most development wasnt to see mega flow numbers but on good flow curves suitable for likely combos. Alot of choices already digitized Most revision in the new castings was to allow for ports bigger than found in Fultons N2O build with "Max Cast" cnc heads without welding. I think that motor with a cam and possibly header change with 2-3 more points compression might hint at the NA potential. There are ports developed beyond the Max cast cnc. At what point one decides to put those ports (or even bigger) in a CV2 billet is something to discuss with Bill or Jim. Bill is putting together a big NA motor and tight lipped on expected numbers. I'd expect strong numbers but we may not see them until its been in a suitable car and rode hard. If its better than what he expects it to do I'd expect a package will be made available and Bill will try to out do himself from there. |
|
#1153
|
||||
|
||||
|
Put it on the street and I'm in with an '05 NA GTO or a 73 NA TA. You in?
|
|
#1154
|
|||
|
|||
|
If a head has been on the market for 7+ years and its performance potential/ claims are still being disputed, then I would think its REAL relevance in the market has been established ! Kind of would seem obvious ,except for those who **"WISH"** it to be different.
Ot at least thats my take on it. |
|
#1155
|
|||
|
|||
|
Best post on this subject in seven years.
|
|
#1156
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
#1157
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Ur almost as bad as Bill and the rest of the duffeses with the 30k tops end BS. |
|
#1158
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think we need another EHTTFMF.
Carry on. Question? Did dicks e- headed engine have a dry sump on it?
__________________
540 c.i. Ultra Street Combo Tiger Heads with Tiger Intake Induction Solutions fogger with .046s 1.079 4.52 155.15 3000 lbs 7.77 @ 169 1/4 Mile (2015) with EHTTFMF!! 7.17 @ 188 1/4 mile (2024) Special Thanks to: Ron at Rhodes Custom Auto Butler Peformance Jim Hostler's Transmissions (HOSGTO) on here Induction Solutions BES Racing Engines. Cheeseburger VP Racing Fuels Calvert Racing |
|
#1159
|
|||
|
|||
|
How is it that people know how much money other people spend on their stuff? Allot left in a combination that cooked parts on what's supposed to be a moderate hit? Let's get real here.
__________________
Be carefull of the feet you step on today.They may be attached to the a$$ you kiss tomorrow. |
|
#1160
|
||||
|
||||
|
Jack I have been pressured to question your new build (and this is supposed to prove I am not a hater or biased) so my question about your new build is..... have you had a catastrophic failure of any sort and if you did would it have cost a considerable amount of money to repair it?
|
| Closed Thread |
|
|