Pontiac - Street No question too basic here!

          
View Poll Results: 180 degree or 195 degree thermostat?
180 77 83.70%
195 15 16.30%
Voters: 92. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 11-13-2017, 09:41 PM
promptcritical's Avatar
promptcritical promptcritical is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 283
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dataway View Post
Were you a nuke? Seems like I remember a couple on here.

I think if you'll recall your formulas ... more flow = more heat transfer (all things remaining constant), not better transfer. Transfer coefficients are based on materials used, medium of transfer and type of flow (laminar or turbulent). But yes total heat transfer in the sink would include Delta T and flow rate.

So, if an increase of flow changes a turbulent flow in to laminar, you could have a lower transfer coefficient. And if T-in is so low that the Delta T between heat source and heat sink are too small transfer efficiency can suffer depending on materials used etc. Not to mention possible aeration of the coolant which does bad things to heat transfer coefficients.

T-in and T-out are used to calculate total heat loss through the heat sink when combined with flow rate and btu/lb-ma of the transfer medium. Actual transfer coefficient calculation for the whole sink would have to take into consideration surface area of the heat sink, flow type, material coefficients, corrosion layers etc.

From a practical standpoint, yeah, ((t-in)-(t-out)) x flow rate(lb-ma) x btu/lb-ma would give you the total heat loss through the exchanger. But only in a perfect system. If flow rate alters flow type, or causes aeration, etc. it's not always a straight line relationship. And material thermo-conductivity changes based on temperature. Also radiation heat loses increase with temperature.

Every system has an ideal flow rate and Delta-T that it is designed to operate within. If flow rate was the only consideration .... all any system would need to be a better system would be bigger and bigger pumps. Usually the heat sink has to be matched with the heat source. Remove a thermostat and it's possible the temps could go down. It's also possible the heat sink would be incapable of lowering the temps beyond the designed limit ... such as 180 degrees, and also possible a flow rate which the system was not designed to handle could reduce the efficiency of the entire system. Also possible the radiator would be incapable of using the extra flow.

I would say it all depends on the particular system in question. Might cool some vehicles down, might make others run hotter.

Don't make me get out my Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow notes .... I still have them you know Class of 7801 (Instructor at M.A.R.F. 79-82, Kesselring Site, NY)
Ha they’re everywhere. S3G in 78, splitting atoms in the fleet until Trident Design School in 80 at S8G, then New construction at EB, and back out to sea 82-86.

 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:48 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017