Pontiac - Street No question too basic here!

          
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 08-28-2019, 03:01 AM
krisr's Avatar
krisr krisr is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sydney, OZ
Posts: 1,480
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KEN CROCIE View Post
Getting back to "design flaw".
The design flaw is that the engineers who designed the Pontiac engine in or about 1953 did not anticipate a roller cam would be installed, 60 years later, that had so much lift and duration that the lifter bores would snap off as a result.
Could it be the open design of the lifter valley was used to promote and ensure lifter lubrication?
I agree that the open lifter bores + the roller camshafts that we're running today is probably the "suggested flaw", but it's because we are operating outside of the limits of the blocks original intended purpose. But it's an easily correctable flaw as is with technology advancements today we can reinforce the bores and enjoy life. </thread>

__________________
'71 Holden HQ Monaro - 3850lbs race weight, 400c/i - 11.4 @ 120
'66 Pontiac GTO - 389, 4 speed street cruiser
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:19 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017