| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Social Groups |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
And yes, they DO coexist - put people fixate on a certain peak HP, and do not pay any attention to what is going on below that peak. Or after it. Several years ago, I was asked to help with an LS street/strip truck. It was 440+ cid, MAST heads, lots of good parts. It had an HR that was around 250/258. It put well over 500hp to the wheels, but it was rather soft off the line. I had another cam ground for him, a 236/270 with similar lift. Peak HP was virtually the same (new cam was maybe 4hp higher). But, his midrange (starting where his converter stalled) got a HUGE boost. The owner had to learn to tune his Cal-Tracs, as he was then blowing the tires away. If the only thing being looked at was peak HP, then those two cams would be considered equal. But they performed WAY differently.
__________________
'73 T/A (sold). Low budget stock headed 8.3:1 455, 222/242 116lsa .443/.435 cam. FAST Sportsman EFI, 317rwhp/385rwtq on 87 octane. 13.12 @103.2, 1.91 60'. '67 Firebird [sold], ; 11.27 @ 119.61, 7.167 @ 96.07, with UD 280/280 (108LSA/ 109 ICL)solid cam. [1.537, 7.233 @93.61, 11.46 @ 115.4 w/ old UD 288/296 108 hydraulic cam] Feb '05 HPP, home-ported "16" D-ports, dished pistons (pump gas only), 3.42 gears, 275/60 DR's, 750DP, T2, full exhaust |
|
|