[Bjorn]

Chris , it may not be a coming ice age, but it doesnt seem to be a global warming coming either....just fluctuations , or cycles...as always has been...most likely always will be....and there wasnt anything that you could discredit?
Also, how "insightful" do you think Al Gores movie is/was?

If it werent for the continual liberal - x. y. - it wouldnt be so necessary for conservatives to try and spread truth to offset it!!

(and libs are ALWAYS asking for links to back up what they say) so Bjorn gave ya some!
pretty insightful too if I say so myself ;-)

[Grant Miller]

Originally Posted by 62Lemans

If it werent for the continual liberal - x. y. - it wouldnt be so necessary for conservatives to try and spread truth to offset it!!

(and libs are ALWAYS asking for links to back up what they say) so Bjorn gave ya some!
pretty insightful too if I say so myself ;-)

How do you turn a search for facts into this crap? Are you a conservative? If so, how do you know? What is a lib?

[The Boss]

Originally Posted by Bjorn

Chris , it may not be a coming ice age, but it doesnt seem to be a global warming coming either....just fluctuations , or cycles...as always has been...most likely always will be....and there wasnt anything that you could discredit?
Also, how "insightful" do you think Al Gores movie is/was?

Bjorn, what is there to discredit about that post - that there are undersea volcano's? That they can only be filmed from submersibles? That the video is now on youtube?

How any of that "proves" that global warming is not taking place I'm still a little fuzzy on. If I'm correct, your quack site has no "proof" only speculation that undersea volcanoes are the reason the west antarctic ice shelf is breaking up. However, like anything that goes viral on the internet or tabloid cable channels, if you say it enough times, somebody will start believing it.

62Lemans - thanks for your commentary - always appreciated.

[Bjorn]

Originally Posted by The Boss

Bjorn, what is there to discredit about that post - that there are undersea volcano's? That they can only be filmed from submersibles? That the video is now on youtube?

How any of that "proves" that global warming is not taking place I'm still a little fuzzy on. If I'm correct, your quack site has no "proof" only speculation that undersea volcanoes are the reason the west antarctic ice shelf is breaking up. However, like anything that goes viral on the internet or tabloid cable channels, if you say it enough times, somebody will start believing it.

62Lemans - thanks for your commentary - always appreciated.

1) no, theres nothing to discredit...but you are trying to say that a huge heat source in the ocean ,doesnt warm it up?? but our breathing or burping does...? I know , I simplified that a bit, but "Im only trying to make a point".....Or are you implying that volcanos under west antarctic ice sheld can not make it melt? try a little science experiment, you should soon have ice outside you can try with....if global warming is in the way for that, try some out of your freezer...put a heat source under it , you`ll see the effect...
But I guess its too simple of an answer to why ice melts and oceans warm up....??

2) a quack site? because you dont agree? How about Al Gores Quack movie that even I knew was a couple of big lies in....I knew that from just having listened in school....but people I argue about it with say "he`s just trying to make a point"....so then its ok tio lie? They knew they lies too, but were ready to overlook it , because he was making a point?

3) ,yes 62LeMans, it IS appreciated ,when someone understands!

Boss; May I infer from your statement:
"if you say it enough times, somebody will start believing it",
that you figure if you refute truth often enuf people will believe what you say ??

And why is it that your links and references are 'truth' but links and articles referencing conservative views are false?? Huh??