[Chris Petersen]

I thought I read here somewhere in the Race section that making 1000HP from E-heads, was like falling off a log? Maybe I'll have to break out the search feature...

Where are the E-head nut-swingers now?

[LiL Jack]

Originally Posted by Chris Petersen

I thought I read here somewhere in the Race section that making 1000HP from E-heads, was like falling off a log? Maybe I'll have to break out the search feature...

Where are the E-head nut-swingers now?

We don't race dynos we could care less!

See sig

[john marcella]

Originally Posted by LiL Jack

We don't race dynos we could care less!

See sig

Blablabla, you reference hp all the time. A dyno is the most accurate way to measure power, to many variables in a car and from car to car.

[Jeff Kinsler]

499 ci. 998 @ 8100.

[Stan Weiss]

Originally Posted by Jeff Kinsler

499 ci. 998 @ 8100.

Jeff,
You and Lil Jack need to get your HP numbers synchronized.

Stan

Originally Posted by LiL Jack

At how many cubic inches?

An E head has already track proven about 1030 HP with 499 cubic inches.

Originally Posted by Stan Weiss

Lil Jack,
That must of been before my time here. Do you have a link to a time sheet and vehicle information?

Thanks,
Stan

Originally Posted by LiL Jack

I am talking about King Kinsler:

[email protected] @ 3250#

4.380 bore
4.150 stroke
499 cu in. Gaby ported E heads and BOP intake.
N/A
275 Drag Radial, turbo 400 trans.

EHTTFMF

[LiL Jack]

Originally Posted by Stan Weiss

Jeff,
You and Lil Jack need to get your HP numbers synchronized.

Stan

Again, we don't care about dynos.

Track results are all that matter.

[Aaron Quinton]

Nice numbers. How much offset?

Originally Posted by Jeff Kinsler

499 ci. 998 @ 8100.

[mike leech]

Originally Posted by GTOGEORGE

East Coast Weather!
GTO George

true...and i'll admit i'm jealous

Originally Posted by 65nss4spdGTO

This isn't about the CV-1's, they have not made 1000 HP.

Not even close! lol..... if ya count happy numbers but not in the car

Originally Posted by Chris Petersen

I thought I read here somewhere in the Race section that making 1000HP from E-heads, was like falling off a log? Maybe I'll have to break out the search feature...

Where are the E-head nut-swingers now?

LOL! going way faster than all the cv gang and most of the rest...falling off a log....Good post its not that easy cuz curts is the only one I've seen...so far.

Originally Posted by john marcella

10 min before it starts snowing

I'm deer hunting then.....

Originally Posted by LiL Jack

Gaby E heads. The car was out the other weekend and broke the rear.

thats a bad dude

Originally Posted by john marcella

Blablabla, you reference hp all the time. A dyno is the most accurate way to measure power, to many variables in a car and from car to car.

honestly after what I've seen i cannot agree with that. True the dyno only measures the power....still a lot of variation in pumps, even in weather. We saw 25 on yours on different days with no tuning changes. thats a lot
"if" I dynoed at the same place in2013 I did in 2012 It would have made 1050+ and we know that would be wrong....

[65nss4spdGTO]

Originally Posted by mike leech

true...and i'll admit i'm jealous
Not even close! lol..... if ya count happy numbers but not in the car

True,

But lets not forget that the highest CV-1 motor to date made just a bit more than yours did on the same happy dyno, just wonder what that motor could have done had they stayed at it like you have???

Calvin Hill
Hill Performance
708-250-7420