[johnta1]

You brought up the "#2" .

The data for the #1 shows what he said.
The MPH HP shows what the dyno said, the ET is off because he hasn't got the car lined out.



Yours is basically the same setup.
(if the numbers/data is correct)

Your dyno showed 1030 HP?
The car shows 1040 HP by the ET.
But the MPH shows more HP than the dyno.

So either your dyno is off or your data is off.

[slowbird]

Originally Posted by johnta1

You brought up the "#2" .

The data for the #1 shows what he said.
The MPH HP shows what the dyno said, the ET is off because he hasn't got the car lined out.



Yours is basically the same setup.
(if the numbers/data is correct)

Your dyno showed 1030 HP?
The car shows 1040 HP by the ET.
But the MPH shows more HP than the dyno.

So either your dyno is off or your data is off.

Wow!
Et is off because 60ft is crap, 1.26 60ft. That is why you ALWAYS use mph to figure hp.
So again if you believe 1100hp is achievable based on 1/8 mph (which you say there is nothing wrong with the calculation) with HP heads and a Victor intake and only 511ci. Why would any not go to Dan Barton? KRE can only get 1075hp with a 541, sheetmetal intake and 2 fours. Why choose them?