[PAUL K]

Originally Posted by slowbird

Lol! No hate, just saying i didn't find it impressive like Bill did. I know when i gained 150hp my car ran .5+ quicker and 10mph. Thought i should point out why i felt that way.

TTB is very well versed in expected gains from increased power. All of his CV1 combos have made more power than their predecessor.

[65nss4spdGTO]

I'm not impressed with the 1290 either, didn't show a pony over the 11xx that was in the next lane.

Maybe in time it will.

Calvin Hill
Hill Performance
708-250-7420

[Anderson Port Development]

Originally Posted by 65nss4spdGTO

I'm not impressed with the 1290 either, didn't show a pony over the 11xx that was in the next lane.

Maybe in time it will.

Calvin Hill
Hill Performance
708-250-7420

... ...

[BruceWilkie]

Originally Posted by PAUL K

TTB is very well versed in expected gains from increased power. All of his CV1 combos have made more power than their predecessor.

So who lost power over previous heads Paul? Do tell.

BTW you deserve a point of credit this time...at least you dropped a name.

[PAUL K]

Originally Posted by BruceWilkie

So who lost power over previous heads Paul? Do tell.

BTW you deserve a point of credit this time...at least you dropped a name.

Please reread my post....then explain what you are asking.

[BruceWilkie]

Originally Posted by PAUL K

Please reread my post....then explain what you are asking.

Re-read your own post. It implies Bill makes things up and his heads have not shown improvement over others previous heads.

My reply was simply asking you to point out where there hasnt been improvement.

I didnt ask you to deflect the question.

Not hatin' on you Paul but making remarks worded so you can later deny you meant anything "bad" by them is chicken ****. So is deflecting questions.

If you want to criticize Bills work show him how its done then.
Get a work piece, set and agree on targets, and find a neutral party to test against each others work.
Doesnt have to be a CV head...maybe someone has a damaged unported E-head (or other)that could be cut to be a work piece for both of you.

* I probably should have discussed this with Bill but I think he'd accept the challenge.

[PAUL K]

Originally Posted by BruceWilkie

Re-read your own post. It implies Bill makes things up and his heads have not shown improvement over others previous heads.

My reply was simply asking you to point out where there hasnt been improvement.

I didnt ask you to deflect the question.

Not hatin' on you Paul but making remarks worded so you can later deny you meant anything "bad" by them is chicken ****. So is deflecting questions.

If you want to criticize Bills work show him how its done then.
Get a work piece, set and agree on targets, and find a neutral party to test against each others work.
Doesnt have to be a CV head...maybe someone has a damaged unported E-head (or other)that could be cut to be a work piece for both of you.

* I probably should have discussed this with Bill but I think he'd accept the challenge.

There you go jumping to conclusions and getting all butt hurt over your own words, again.

[slowbird]

Originally Posted by PAUL K

There you go jumping to conclusions and getting all butt hurt over your own words, again.

Paul don't be naive, there is always hiden meaning in post, a post can't possibly mean what it says, that would be too simple.

[PAUL K]

Originally Posted by slowbird

Paul don't be naive, there is always hiden meaning in post, a post can't possibly mean what it says, that would be too simple.

True! I'm trying to figure out why one would be happy with a 150 horsepower gain and a minimal improvement in ET with a CV1 head and be unimpressed with a 150 horsepower gain and a minimal improvement in ET with a Tiger head.

[PAUL K]

[QUOTE=BruceWilkie;5632370]

Not hatin' on you Paul but making remarks worded so you can later deny you meant anything "bad" by them is chicken ****. So is deflecting questions.

/QUOTE]

Would this be worse than making up the facts as you go along?

What question did I deflect?

[BruceWilkie]

[QUOTE=PAUL K;5632409]

Originally Posted by BruceWilkie

Not hatin' on you Paul but making remarks worded so you can later deny you meant anything "bad" by them is chicken ****. So is deflecting questions.

/QUOTE]

Would this be worse than making up the facts as you go along?

What question did I deflect?

Lets start here and get back to that^^^...

http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...postcount=1010

Some people in this thread jump to conclusions.... also some perfer to make their own facts up.

I followed with...
http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...postcount=1013

Who?? Name names so we know who you are talking about.

Before next reply to me paul posts this...
http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...postcount=1026

TTB is very well versed in expected gains from increased power. All of his CV1 combos have made more power than their predecessor.

I respond to post 1026
http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...postcount=1034

So who lost power over previous heads Paul? Do tell.

BTW you deserve a point of credit this time...at least you dropped a name.

Your response...
http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...postcount=1038

Please reread my post....then explain what you are asking.

My reply...
http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...postcount=1091

Re-read your own post. It implies Bill makes things up and his heads have not shown improvement over others previous heads.

My reply was simply asking you to point out where there hasnt been improvement.

I didnt ask you to deflect the question.

Not hatin' on you Paul but making remarks worded so you can later deny you meant anything "bad" by them is chicken ****. So is deflecting questions.

If you want to criticize Bills work show him how its done then.
Get a work piece, set and agree on targets, and find a neutral party to test against each others work.
Doesnt have to be a CV head...maybe someone has a damaged unported E-head (or other)that could be cut to be a work piece for both of you.

* I probably should have discussed this with Bill but I think he'd accept the challenge.

pauls reply.(note still no answer to the question in post 1034^^^)
http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...postcount=1092

There you go jumping to conclusions and getting all butt hurt over your own words, again.

paul additionaly says...

http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...postcount=1099

[quote]

Originally Posted by BruceWilkie

Not hatin' on you Paul but making remarks worded so you can later deny you meant anything "bad" by them is chicken ****. So is deflecting questions.

/QUOTE]

Would this be worse than making up the facts as you go along?

What question did I deflect?

For saying "you" I guess that means me...close enough to a name... you get another credit.
SO now im making up facts? Please share with everyone what "facts" I've made up! This should be interesting. Be sure to provide reference and dont forget any I acknowledge when I've got something wrong.

As to the questions you deflected... See posts 1013 1026 and 1034
The questions asked in those 3 posts.

All here in one post to save you from jumping page to page.


Seems like you're taking lessons from Gach and hoping you can cloud your posts till they get buried in new posts. Maybe he'll give you a good report card and a sticker.

[PAUL K]

[QUOTE=BruceWilkie;5632580][QUOTE=PAUL K;5632409]

Lets start here and get back to that^^^...

http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...postcount=1010



I followed with...
http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...postcount=1013



Before next reply to me paul posts this...
http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...postcount=1026



I respond to post 1026
http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...postcount=1034



Your response...
http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...postcount=1038



My reply...
http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...postcount=1091



pauls reply.(note still no answer to the question in post 1034^^^)
http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...postcount=1092



paul additionaly says...

http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...postcount=1099

For saying "you" I guess that means me...close enough to a name... you get another credit.
SO now im making up facts? Please share with everyone what "facts" I've made up! This should be interesting. Be sure to provide reference and dont forget any I acknowledge when I've got something wrong.

As to the questions you deflected... See posts 1013 1026 and 1034
The questions asked in those 3 posts.

All here in one post to save you from jumping page to page.


Seems like you're taking lessons from Gach and hoping you can cloud your posts till they get buried in new posts. Maybe he'll give you a good report card and a sticker.

Bruce, you are much better at computer stuff than me. I'll do my best to answer all your questions. You make facts up! You've mentioned more than once Fulton's CV1 combo went faster than his Gabby Eheads.... that is a lie! 100% made up! You stated that DF's CV1/Ehead stock block dyno test had EIC heads....another made up fact. You stated DF's heads have never been removed this year, TTB says they've had the pistons out on a freshen up and DF stated he's had piston issues.....looks like another fact you made up. You're constantly jumping to conclusions..... I make a post backing up TTB's claims and you are ready to fight because you think some how I am anti CV1....which isn't true at all. I'm all about the truth, which you are not unless the truth supports your beliefs.

If I was anti CV1 I would point out that DF ran 7.7 with his Ehead combo roughly six years ago. Fast forward with a new build and much better technology along with improved carburetors and a dry sump he has ran 7.6. I understand that is with less nitrous but we have no idea if the combination will respond to more nitrous favorably. I would also point out that he has a top notch chassis with big tires and only has Cosgrove's Ehead combination covered by a tenth or so and Cosgrove's chassis is leaf springs, Cal-track and smaller tires. Cosgrove's car is ten times more "street" than DF's car, I've seen both cars in person.. I would also point out that DF has Kinsler's much smaller cid Ehead combination covered by a tenth or so and Kinsler has a small tire, Cal-Track leaf spring suspension 1/8 mile car using a single four and plate ...not two fours and a dual fogger. But since I'm not a CV1 hater I won't mention the above.

I apologize to Cosgrove and Kinsler for mentioning their names but I didn't really see a way around it. Both their cars are bad azz and do the Pontiac community proud.

[Anderson Port Development]

Originally Posted by PAUL K

TTB is very well versed in expected gains from increased power. All of his CV1 combos have made more power than their predecessor.

... kinda not sure Paul, what exactly are you saying here ?? ...

[PAUL K]

Originally Posted by Anderson Port Development

... kinda not sure Paul, what exactly are you saying here ?? ...

TTB , what part needs clarification?

[Anderson Port Development]

Originally Posted by PAUL K

TTB , what part needs clarification?

... the whole thing, you were being rather vague or non-specific, so i asked what you meant ...

[PAUL K]

Originally Posted by Anderson Port Development

... the whole thing, you were being rather vague or non-specific, so i asked what you meant ...

You posted a list of cars you put CV'ies on that went faster and I'm implying you'd have a pretty good idea of how much improvement you'd see from your experience.