Pontiac - Street No question too basic here!

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-11-2011, 02:09 PM
crustysarge crustysarge is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Northern Italy
Posts: 522
Default Main Bearing Clearances, Line Hone Needed?

I have a 72 YH 455 block that I have had for 22 years under my bench and recently decided to build it up. Stroker kit with forged Eagle crank. This weekend I set up ARP studs, stock main caps, FM bearings and the clearances were:

#1 .0015
#2 .0015
#3 .0010
#4 .0018
#5 .0018 (Rear)

I set up the crank and torqued the studs to 110 and 140 on the rear. Crank would turn with all installed but #3, just too tight.

Time for a line hone? I had the shop do a deck and bore/hone but held off on the line hone until I could check personally

  #2  
Old 04-11-2011, 02:23 PM
cdrookie cdrookie is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: NW PA
Posts: 769
Default

ya, those clearances are too tight

  #3  
Old 04-11-2011, 02:25 PM
cdrookie cdrookie is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: NW PA
Posts: 769
Default

take the bearings out and remeasure to see if they're at factory specs also

  #4  
Old 04-11-2011, 06:12 PM
Tom Vaught's Avatar
Tom Vaught Tom Vaught is offline
Boost Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The United States of America
Posts: 31,302
Default

Try a different brand of bearings too.

Tom Vaught

__________________
"Engineers do stuff for reasons" Tom Vaught

Despite small distractions, there are those who will go Forward, Learning, Sharing Knowledge, Doing what they can to help others move forward.
  #5  
Old 04-11-2011, 06:17 PM
taff2's Avatar
taff2 taff2 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: South Wales in UK.
Posts: 2,172
Default

Try it again but torque the studs to 85 lb and 100 lb,studs pull differently on the caps compared to bolts and you may be distorting the bearing bores a bit. You may also still be able to pick up a set of 1x bearings(FedMogul used to make them but discontinued them) and use these to adjust your clearances.

  #6  
Old 04-12-2011, 01:47 AM
stimpy stimpy is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 757
Default

if your going from bolts to studs you should have it aligned bored anyways to make sure everything is in alignment .

  #7  
Old 04-12-2011, 06:56 AM
crustysarge crustysarge is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Northern Italy
Posts: 522
Default

I was using the torque rating provided by ARP that came with the studs....You know how that goes...

  #8  
Old 04-12-2011, 07:58 AM
Cliff R's Avatar
Cliff R Cliff R is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Mount Vernon, Ohio 43050
Posts: 18,153
Default

If there were clearance at #3 it would turn fine when the cap was torqued down. Did it leave "witness" marks on the bearing?

Bottom line is that you must have some oil clearance on all the bearings, and the crank must turn freely when all caps are torqued down. I doubt if the torque applied to the bolts or studs has any effect on the bearing clearances. Still wouldn't hurt to go back thru all the caps and re-torque, starting with the thrust bearing, go to #1, then 2, 3, and finish with #5. Turn the crank after each one is tightened, and if it starts getting to tight to turn by hand, stop at that bearing and investigate.

If #3 is the only one giving trouble(s), just a tad too tight and well centered, an oversize bearing might be just enough to avoid line honing the block. If the witness marks show the tight spot all in one direction, most likely you are going to have to line-hone the block to straighten things up some.....Cliff

__________________
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If you can read this in English, thank a Veteran!
https://cliffshighperformance.com/
73 Ventura, SOLD 455, 3740lbs, 11.30's at 120mph, 1977 Pontiac Q-jet, HO intake, HEI, 10" converter, 3.42 gears, DOT's, 7.20's at 96mph and still WAY under the roll bar rule. Best ET to date 7.18 at 97MPH (1/8th mile),
  #9  
Old 04-12-2011, 08:20 AM
Mr. P-Body Mr. P-Body is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,690
Default

Considering it's a forged steel crankshaft, it COULD be "warped". Yes, it happens (regardless of "brand"). A forging should ALWAYS be checked for straightness. Assuring the journals are correct is also necessary.

We've found installing studs has virtually no affect on the straightness of the housing bores. Unlike the Chevy/Ford blocks, the locating dowels do a wonderful job. By all means, MEASURE. If it's "on-size, round and straight" (literally), no need for additional work.

We HAVE seen a significant number of '72-'75 455 blocks with main tunnel "issues". It sometimes shows up with the cam bearings, as well.

Recommend .003" for all the mains, MAYBE .0035" on the rear (not a biggie in a street engine).

Just touching the bases...

Jim

  #10  
Old 04-12-2011, 08:44 AM
Half-Inch Stud's Avatar
Half-Inch Stud Half-Inch Stud is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: BlueBell, PA or AL U.S.A.
Posts: 18,889
Default

Try this: Populate #1, #2, #4, #5 & TQ: dial-indicator on the #3 Journal for Rich-man's Vee-Blocking the Crank.

Seems the #3 Bearing shells are numerically tight. Could perform a FINE hone of the bearings if you have the fine stones. One trick is to put a sacrificial Shell in the Lower if all you want to hone is the Upper. vis-versa.

Playing tricks: I've seen a corrosion ridge form on the Main Saddles that is worth using a blade-scrape. Keeps the Bearing backside on shiny iron.

Finally: reading the "witness marks": Pinch evidence at parting (Cap-Dowel Index) versus score across Bearing Saddle (too tight).

assumption: Block history is clean on "No spun Mains"

  #11  
Old 04-12-2011, 09:35 AM
superdutybob's Avatar
superdutybob superdutybob is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton, MI
Posts: 2,269
Default

What is your crank end play when all torqued? Are you sure its not dragging on a thrust face?

__________________
Bob Woodard
Brighton, MI

2012 SRT8 Charger - 12.70 @ 111mph
  #12  
Old 04-12-2011, 09:16 PM
Brent Flynn's Avatar
Brent Flynn Brent Flynn is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Middletown, IN
Posts: 1,431
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stimpy View Post
if your going from bolts to studs you should have it aligned bored anyways to make sure everything is in alignment .
is this necessary? if it was ok before, why would it change goin to studs instead of the factory bolts? i was thinkin about studding the mains in my engine(455) that im in the process of putting back together...

__________________
1968 Firebird 10.817/122.33 3600lbs trw 455, iron d-port heads/SD intake/q-jet, 9" tires 1.440 60ft
1962 Catalina 4100lbs trw 455, iron d-ports,perf RPM, 800holley, 9'' tires,([email protected])1.578 60' Oct 2010!!

  #13  
Old 04-12-2011, 09:29 PM
performerrpm's Avatar
performerrpm performerrpm is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: oklahoma
Posts: 2,407
Send a message via AIM to performerrpm
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brent Flynn View Post
is this necessary? if it was ok before, why would it change goin to studs instead of the factory bolts? i was thinkin about studding the mains in my engine(455) that im in the process of putting back together...
i was actually thinking about this on my 455 too!!! hope i can do it without a line hone

  #14  
Old 04-12-2011, 09:29 PM
455Grandville's Avatar
455Grandville 455Grandville is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The outskirts of Steelville, Mo
Posts: 1,539
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stimpy View Post
if your going from bolts to studs you should have it aligned bored anyways to make sure everything is in alignment .
line hone w/ stock caps IMO

__________________
Two 1975 455 Grandvilles &
'79 455 Trans Am
‘69 Camaro SS 396/375 (owned since ‘88)
‘67 Corvette 427/435
‘23 Lexus LS500 awd
‘20 Audi R8 & ‘25 Toyota RAV4 (wife’s cars)
‘95 Ford F250 4wd 7.3 p-stroke
& countless Jeeps & off road vehicles & motorcycles
  #15  
Old 04-13-2011, 03:36 AM
crustysarge crustysarge is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Northern Italy
Posts: 522
Default

I have not had time to look at it since Sunday but when I put the crank in I did one cap at a time and the only one that "drags" is #3, damn near impossible to turn. The bearing shell showed some scuffing on the upper half on 3 and some on 2. I swapped some shells around without checking each one for thickness and the problem remained on #3. Problem is I got distracted by some cheap wine and forgot which bearing shell was which when I started...

I don't know history of block as I got it from someone 20+ years ago but the crank was with it and looked OK, BUT, who knows if that crank is from this block? Hell, who knows if these caps are from this block for that matter?

I am going to run it down to the shop today and let him check it out and hone if need be as well check the crank for me. It is a new stroker kit from Pontiac vendor.

  #16  
Old 04-13-2011, 07:28 AM
crustysarge crustysarge is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Northern Italy
Posts: 522
Default

Checked at lunch: I have .004 on the thrust. I put the crank in with just the front and rear main lower halves (poor man's V block...) but got no consistent readings so don't think I'll rely on that. Off to the shop.

  #17  
Old 04-13-2011, 12:48 PM
HWYSTR455's Avatar
HWYSTR455 HWYSTR455 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 16,206
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. P-Body View Post
Considering it's a forged steel crankshaft, it COULD be "warped". Yes, it happens (regardless of "brand"). A forging should ALWAYS be checked for straightness. Assuring the journals are correct is also necessary.

We've found installing studs has virtually no affect on the straightness of the housing bores. Unlike the Chevy/Ford blocks, the locating dowels do a wonderful job. By all means, MEASURE. If it's "on-size, round and straight" (literally), no need for additional work.

We HAVE seen a significant number of '72-'75 455 blocks with main tunnel "issues". It sometimes shows up with the cam bearings, as well.

Recommend .003" for all the mains, MAYBE .0035" on the rear (not a biggie in a street engine).

Just touching the bases...

Jim

Almost verbatim what I would say. Only thing I would add is if you're not sure of the history, you should have the block at the machine shop checking main saddle alignment, deck straightness, deck finish, etc, period. Why toss a fresh rotating assembly in an unknown block?

.

__________________
.

1970 GTO Judge Tribute Pro-Tour Project 535 IA2
http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...d.php?t=760624
1971 Trans Am 463, 315cfm E-head Sniper XFlow EFI, TKO600 extreme, 9", GW suspension, Baer brakes, pro tour car
https://forums.maxperformanceinc.com...ght=procharger
Theme Song: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zKAS...ature=youtu.be
  #18  
Old 04-13-2011, 01:19 PM
hurryinhoosier62 hurryinhoosier62 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Floyd Co., IN/SE KY
Posts: 4,075
Default

crustysarge,

After having align bored several thousand blocks, I would reccomend align honing first.
Sometimes, as little as .0002 can cause misalignment severe enough to prevent a crank
from turning freely.

Jim,

.003-.0035 clearence on a street engine? I have always used the "2/2" formula same
as Ken Crocie and other Pontiac builders. Additionally, I always "mic" my bearings BEFORE beginning assembly NO MATTER what type of engine I'm building.

__________________
“It takes considerable knowledge just to realize the extent of your own ignorance.”

Dr. Thomas Sowell
  #19  
Old 04-20-2011, 03:56 PM
crustysarge crustysarge is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Northern Italy
Posts: 522
Default

Follow up on this. Shop found the main journals were out of round and tried to hone but no luck, had to bore. Machined the caps and bored to stock specs. Eagle forged crank was still not right. I had tried to check it while sitting on the #1 and #5 lower bearings as well as #2 and #4. My readings showed #2 and #4 out of round, by as much as .004 but I was not sure. Today the shop called and said they checked and sure enough found what I had. I did not tell them I measured so they were honest about it.

The old Italian machinst who has worked there for 42 years expressed his thoughts about my new Forged Eagle crank, "Merda Cinese" which means Chinese S#!t... he said it was out of round, poorly ground and that I was fool if I thought I could run it at 500hp levels the way it was. They polished/ground it to proper specs and said it spins freely now and clearances are around .002. I will go down later this week or next to check it out.

Pretty sad I have to work a new crank like that just to get it within normal specs...

  #20  
Old 04-20-2011, 04:20 PM
Half-Inch Stud's Avatar
Half-Inch Stud Half-Inch Stud is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: BlueBell, PA or AL U.S.A.
Posts: 18,889
Default

"""""The bearing shell showed some scuffing on the upper half on 3 and some on 2. """"""

I got a bad bad vibe from that sentence; me thinks you got a split #2 Main: Mag-Flux inspect to prove it's not cracked.

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:16 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017