[mike leech]

Originally Posted by Stan Weiss

Actually this past weekend I was talking to a friend of mine (former aerospace engineer) about this. I will not go into detail as physics is not welcome here. But we were talking about the unsexist of all of the cycles the power stroke.

Stan

Congratulations you found someone else to discuss ideas with and not do anything.

[Stan Weiss]

Originally Posted by mike leech

Congratulations you found someone else to discuss ideas with and not do anything.

Mike,
In the real world people talk about ideas, formulate a plan, and try to validate it before they buy parts. If this gets that far then an engine will be build and dynoed to see if the changes had a positive effect over the present version.

While I am sure almost all of what will be discussed here is ways to generate more cylinder pressure.

We are looking at away to more effective use the cylinder pressure we currently have.

As always waiting for another of intelligent replies.

Stan

[mike leech]

Originally Posted by Stan Weiss

Mike,
In the real world people talk about ideas, formulate a plan, and try to validate it before they buy parts. If this gets that far then an engine will be build and dynoed to see if the changes had a positive effect over the present version.

While I am sure almost all of what will be discussed here is ways to generate more cylinder pressure.

We are looking at away to more effective use the cylinder pressure we currently have.

As always waiting for another of intelligent replies.

Stan

You're a moron. You never buy parts or excute any of your ideas.

You really think we just buy some stuff and hope for the best?

[Stan Weiss]

Originally Posted by mike leech

You're a moron. You never buy parts or excute any of your ideas.

You really think we just buy some stuff and hope for the best?

Mike,
I tried to bring this back to the topic Don wanting to talk about, the 4 cycles.

But thank you, as normal you did not disappoint, and had to make this about me.

I never said this was my projected.

Carry-on.

Stan

[John Langer]

Originally Posted by mike leech

Right but you understand mine is not all fabricated and welded up right?

I have no idea what your intake looks like. A few posts up you said it was all hacked up and welded???

[mike leech]

Originally Posted by John Langer

I have no idea what your intake looks like. A few posts up you said it was all hacked up and welded???

Originally Posted by mike leech

Yeah but my intake is an all hacked up and welded to death so i'm good there

Was using talk to text. It should have read isn't not is an

Originally Posted by mike leech

Right but you understand mine is not all fabricated and welded up right?

Is three times clear enough? If I didn't know better I would think you were trying to give me weight..... And maybe you were even caring a little. :-) I think you might have a picture of it on your phone

[John Langer]

Only intake pic I have on my phone is of my new billet intake...

[mike leech]

Sweet. Sounds like a nice piece. But you don't want to share a picture of that though do you?

[Tom Vaught]

Glad to see the RACERS are talking Racing Engines, Weight, and Intakes.

The Dyno Simulation Guys (still using the 50 Cubic Inch Engine Procedure) are still simulating, postulating, and posting the same BS numbers as in the past.

Mike is still finding Hp with his Pontiac engines (naturally aspirated) and bench racing with the Dyno Simulation Guys as usual.

George is talking about retiring after 40+ years at his work.

Any news about Fulton and the "What" Engine running down the track after the big HP dyno number posted by someone?

Tom V.

[Lupi]

Just finished johns new manifold! J.b.weldttfmf! Guaranteed to go 7s!

[John Langer]

Lrtttfmf'er

[mike leech]

Originally Posted by Lupi

Just finished johns new manifold! J.b.weldttfmf! Guaranteed to go 7s!

Very nice.

[john marcella]

Mike is in the clear for manifold rules for nmca. But i think it would probably be a positive move to go to a sheetmetal in nmca even with the weight hit. Its all just math with power to weight. Jmo

[john marcella]

Mike at your p to w right now you need to find 22hp to be a wash with a sheetmetal with 1 carb.

[mike leech]

Originally Posted by john marcella

Mike at your p to w right now you need to find 22hp to be a wash with a sheetmetal with 1 carb.

Maybe you are on to something.

[Lupi]

Originally Posted by john marcella

Mike at your p to w right now you need to find 22hp to be a wash with a sheetmetal with 1 carb.

Or 4 tenths...

[mike leech]

Originally Posted by Lupi

Or 4 tenths...

LOL. you really are funny.


8.03 169.7 in 2700 da martin mi in june compared to??????

7.96 at mir in november 300 ft da.......

NOT even 1 tenth genius.

Keep your crying towel handy.

[John Langer]

8.13 @ -1600' da at Mir in November
7.90 @ 600' da at Mir in November

[mike leech]

Originally Posted by John Langer

8.13 @ -1600' da at Mir in November
7.90 @ 600' da at Mir in November

There ya go azzwipe your very best to my very worst is .2 and -1600 LOL your such a butthurt little girl!!! Thats funny!!!!

Hang your hat on that......hope it makes you feel better.

And i was off .16 in 60' and .27 in 330.' With a blown strut spinning for 1.79 sec in the run


I KNOW YOU WANT TO PRETEND THE 8.03 didnt happen. But the truth it was off a bit too. Like .04 in 60' vs my best 60 when the car was .3 seconds slower.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=IDdAGDt9MmQ

[John Langer]

Was 8.13 at Mir your very best or very worse? Just trying to compare same track same tire same rules results. The et in that video is a little fuzzy. Having a hard time making out what it says.