Pontiac - Boost Turbo, supercharged, Nitrous, EFI & other Power Adders discussed here.

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-12-2024, 10:30 AM
pontiac_boy pontiac_boy is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Delaware
Posts: 17
Default Cranks for boosted applications.

Little bit of a noob here when it comes to boosted Pontiac but I wanted to get a general understanding on y’all’s experience and opinions on cranks.

I’m in the initial process of collecting parts for a Boosted drag and drive motor. A couple months ago I called Frank at All Pontiac and made a deposit on an aftermarket iron block. While talking to him, he recommended a 4.25 bore and 4.25 stroke Billet crank.

I’ve seen previous threads from a couple years back where people have stated keeping the stroke shorter would be ideal and even some have said 4.00 and under, but I’ve also seen a few guys successfully running a longer stroke successfully. What’s the current consensus in stroke?

I’m looking to build something capable of mid nines initially with room to grow as I gain more experience with the combo. So I’m figuring in a 3600lb car I probably need to be in the 1k-1200hp range?
Am I crazy?

  #2  
Old 04-12-2024, 12:48 PM
performerrpm's Avatar
performerrpm performerrpm is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: oklahoma
Posts: 2,407
Send a message via AIM to performerrpm
Default

have you received your block? i put my deposit down 2 months ago as well and hoping it gets here soon.

frank rec'd me to go with a 4.35 bore with my roots blown build and at the time i was gonna use my 4.0 crank . i instead used that crank in my 400 and going to run a 4.250 crank in the ia2 block with a procharger. seams like 4.0 and 4.250 is the general consensus on boosted apps even using a new block

  #3  
Old 04-12-2024, 01:52 PM
charlie66's Avatar
charlie66 charlie66 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,456
Default

IMO the smallest stroke is the way to go. I go mid nines with a 3.75" stroke with a 198ci motor . More stroke will just make it harder to get down the track ..

__________________
My Half AN Injun.....
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to charlie66 For This Useful Post:
  #4  
Old 04-13-2024, 09:17 AM
pontiac_boy pontiac_boy is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Delaware
Posts: 17
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by performerrpm View Post
have you received your block? i put my deposit down 2 months ago as well and hoping it gets here soon.

frank rec'd me to go with a 4.35 bore with my roots blown build and at the time i was gonna use my 4.0 crank . i instead used that crank in my 400 and going to run a 4.250 crank in the ia2 block with a procharger. seams like 4.0 and 4.250 is the general consensus on boosted apps even using a new block
So I talked to him in mid February and he said I was 9 or 10 on the list. He said he wasn’t sure but he was expecting them to be done at the foundry in a couple weeks but we’d then be at the mercy of the machine shop after that. I hope to hear something this month but I’m not expecting anything as I’m not in a rush.

It seems like a decent amount of guy’s suggest the shorter stroke I’m just trying to better understand why. And those billet cranks are a big purchase.

  #5  
Old 04-13-2024, 12:59 PM
charlie66's Avatar
charlie66 charlie66 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,456
Default

The reason why is that with a turbo torque becomes so multiplied it becomes a problem to get traction. So a short stroke will help you in that respect.. You still will have more torque then you will need with the shorter stroke. Im building a motor now with 3.330 stroke because even with 3.750 stroke it was too much imo...

__________________
My Half AN Injun.....
  #6  
Old 04-13-2024, 04:45 PM
performerrpm's Avatar
performerrpm performerrpm is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: oklahoma
Posts: 2,407
Send a message via AIM to performerrpm
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pontiac_boy View Post
So I talked to him in mid February and he said I was 9 or 10 on the list. He said he wasn’t sure but he was expecting them to be done at the foundry in a couple weeks but we’d then be at the mercy of the machine shop after that. I hope to hear something this month but I’m not expecting anything as I’m not in a rush.

It seems like a decent amount of guy’s suggest the shorter stroke I’m just trying to better understand why. And those billet cranks are a big purchase.
dang we must have ordered within days of each other lol. i ordetrd around the 16th of feb and was number 8. i hit him uo yesterday and he said its at the machine shop.. im not really in a hurry either...i think my 434 will be plenty while i piece together the new one

  #7  
Old 04-16-2024, 03:18 PM
Dragncar Dragncar is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Humbolt County California
Posts: 9,232
Default

Lots of big power boosted Pontiacs with 4 inch strokes out there. Its what Chief ran.

  #8  
Old 04-16-2024, 06:08 PM
Tom Vaught's Avatar
Tom Vaught Tom Vaught is offline
Boost Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The United States of America
Posts: 31,302
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pontiac_boy View Post
Little bit of a noob here when it comes to boosted Pontiac but I wanted to get a general understanding on y’all’s experience and opinions on cranks.

I’m looking to build something capable of mid nines initially with room to grow as I gain more experience with the combo. So I’m figuring in a 3600lb car I probably need to be in the 1k-1200hp range?
Am I crazy?
John Meany had a 1000 hp Small Block Chevy STREET engine in a Corvette 25 years ago that he drove everywhere at low boost (less than 15 psi of boost) John Lingerfeller was involved in the project.

A YSi Vortech Supercharger would make 1200 in a street car with a basic BB Chevy engine years ago. A Procharger supercharger can easily make the same power.

A boosted Pontiac Turbo Engine (one turbo) would require a Large turbo (or 2 turbos ) and would be very soft on the bottom unless paired with a 400+ cid engine.

Tom V.

__________________
"Engineers do stuff for reasons" Tom Vaught

Despite small distractions, there are those who will go Forward, Learning, Sharing Knowledge, Doing what they can to help others move forward.

Last edited by Tom Vaught; 04-16-2024 at 06:14 PM.
  #9  
Old 04-16-2024, 10:04 PM
blueghoast's Avatar
blueghoast blueghoast is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,613
Default

Mine is a 400 ci 60-over make's a ton of power no dyno numbers.
I just bump the cam a bit to a solid roller I'm hoping for 1-1200hp
with iron heads, When I get the 77-firebird done I'm going to install
it in that might be a while unless I just have to know and put it one of
my other cars. I might dyno it this time too.

GT

  #10  
Old 11-30-2025, 04:50 AM
blueghoast's Avatar
blueghoast blueghoast is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,613
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blueghoast View Post
Mine is a 400 ci 60-over make's a ton of power no dyno numbers.
I just bump the cam a bit to a solid roller I'm hoping for 1-1200hp
with iron heads, When I get the 77-firebird done I'm going to install
it in that might be a while unless I just have to know and put it one of
my other cars. I might dyno it this time too.

GT
I meant 1000-1200 and that would be spraying it too.

GT

  #11  
Old 01-04-2026, 05:55 PM
opeliac opeliac is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 500
Default

I ended up with a 4.250 x 4.250...Its been a durable combo for Chief's car...ANY car that is being built for power, should be able to deal with the traction that is needed...

  #12  
Old 01-05-2026, 11:06 AM
mgarblik mgarblik is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 6,989
Default

At the power levels you are considering, I don't feel any Billet crankshaft from a quality vendor like Moldex, Crower, Wynberg, Bryant will be any issue at all. Honestly, a Molnar forging would be fine as well. I have used all the ones mentioned personally other than Bryant and Wynberg. As far as stroke, we ran 4.50" stroke in IA and IA 2 blocks for years @ up to 1500 HP and never had a crankshaft or bearing failure. That was nitrous boosted. The long stroke was pretty hard on piston skirts with lack of support at the bottom. I prefer 4.25" stroke if given the choice. A square engine, 4.25"X4.25" is a nice compromise with 482 inches for excellent torque, better skirt support, more cylinder wall material and sealing area. I feel that's the sweet spot for these engines. Not sure what the attraction would be for a shorter stroke in a Pontiac race engine? Rules requiring a smaller displacement? The desire to run it at very high RPM's? We ran our 482 Cu In engine at 8400 RPM's without issues. That was with a roots blower.

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to mgarblik For This Useful Post:
  #13  
Old 01-05-2026, 03:24 PM
R 70 Judge's Avatar
R 70 Judge R 70 Judge is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 2,909
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mgarblik View Post
At the power levels you are considering, I don't feel any Billet crankshaft from a quality vendor like Moldex, Crower, Wynberg, Bryant will be any issue at all. Honestly, a Molnar forging would be fine as well. I have used all the ones mentioned personally other than Bryant and Wynberg. As far as stroke, we ran 4.50" stroke in IA and IA 2 blocks for years @ up to 1500 HP and never had a crankshaft or bearing failure. That was nitrous boosted. The long stroke was pretty hard on piston skirts with lack of support at the bottom. I prefer 4.25" stroke if given the choice. A square engine, 4.25"X4.25" is a nice compromise with 482 inches for excellent torque, better skirt support, more cylinder wall material and sealing area. I feel that's the sweet spot for these engines. Not sure what the attraction would be for a shorter stroke in a Pontiac race engine? Rules requiring a smaller displacement? The desire to run it at very high RPM's? We ran our 482 Cu In engine at 8400 RPM's without issues. That was with a roots blower.
Curious, is there a preferred rod length with that stroke?

__________________
James
1970 Trans Am

Spotts Built 484" IA2, Highports, EFI Northwind, E85
Holley Terminator X sequential EFI fabrication and suspension by
https://www.funkhouserracecars.com/
  #14  
Old 01-05-2026, 10:20 PM
mgarblik mgarblik is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 6,989
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by R 70 Judge View Post
Curious, is there a preferred rod length with that stroke?
To get the compression height we wanted and provide room for the large pins, {1.031"), we used 6.7" aluminum connecting rods. I don't really know if they were optimal. We had Bill Miller as a consultant on the roots blower engine and that's what he felt comfortable with. No issues.

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:02 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017