Pontiac - Street No question too basic here!

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-02-2025, 11:15 AM
ponjohn's Avatar
ponjohn ponjohn is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Fort Myers, Fl.
Posts: 9,715
Default Stall / Lock up

Historically, there was always a compromise between driveability and strip performance when choosing a stall.

Can the stall now lean more towards strip performance with a lockup convertor?

Discuss.

  #2  
Old 08-02-2025, 11:59 AM
steve25's Avatar
steve25 steve25 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Westchester NY
Posts: 17,516
Default

Yes, but unless you have a well designed expensive lock up converter they can only handle so much power.

Just ask the Buick guys who have run Buick factory lock up converters into the low 11s , that is into the low 11s for a while until it went south.

__________________
Wernher Von Braun warned before his retirement from NASA back in 1972, that the next world war would be against the ETs!
And he was not talking about 1/8 or 1/4 mile ETs!

1) 1940s 100% silver 4 cup tea server set.

Two dry rotted 14 x 10 Micky Thompson slicks.

1) un-mailed in gift coupon from a 1972 box of corn flakes.
Two pairs of brown leather flip flops, never seen more then 2 mph.

Education is what your left with once you forget things!
  #3  
Old 08-02-2025, 12:07 PM
JLMounce JLMounce is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Greeley, Colorado
Posts: 4,540
Send a message via AIM to JLMounce
Default

In some aspects, yes. A lockup converter is going to help at higher speed cruise that occurs below the converter stall. You enjoy better manners and lower temps here.

However the lockup converter strategy is always available to you and you may find the lower speed cruising in town still suffers from the same issues related to a loose converter.

My setup as an example uses a triple disc lockup converter. I can lock it up in 2nd through 4th gear at almost any rpm and throttle input. However the car drives better in the lower operating gears without being locked up. I use it instead in its performance application by locking it up at wide open throttle at about 4500 rpm in 3rd.

For cruise operation the converter locks only in 3rd and 4th at low throttle inputs and I have a fairly wide hysteresis set to keep the converter from cycling on and off. As a result a lot of in town driving does see lockup unless it’s a pretty steady state cruise.

For me this isn’t too terrible of a situation because even though the converter stalls around 3200 rpm, it is not incredibly loose and couples positively under that rpm when torque application is lower.

Mixed with a converter that is always very loose with a higher stall, the lockup is going to tend to be jerky as it engages.

__________________
-Jason
1969 Pontiac Firebird
  #4  
Old 08-02-2025, 01:55 PM
PAUL K's Avatar
PAUL K PAUL K is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sugar Grove IL USA
Posts: 7,435
Default

I'm the wrong guy to ask but I just helped pick out a converter for my nephews 2000 TA. After researching what I could (not much useful information out there) I read many threads saying stall doesn't matter with a lock up. After pondering it for a while I ordered the tightest converter Hayes offers. My thinking was a higher stall will drive loose until the converter locks up in high gear. So he'd have three gears of slop and then a tight converter. Hopefully I made the right choice.

__________________
Go fast, see Elvis!
www.facebook.com/PaulKnippensMuscleMotors
  #5  
Old 08-02-2025, 08:18 PM
Sirrotica's Avatar
Sirrotica Sirrotica is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Catawba Ohio
Posts: 7,553
Default

It all depends on what transmission you have too. The 200s aren't nearly as forgiving as a 4L80E, nor known for longevity when locking up under a lot of power.

There are some transmissions that are in race cars such as pro mods that use lockup convertors to gain some top speed at the end of the run. Companies such as Rossler, Hughes, etc. have lockup convertor transmissions for strictly race applications.

Link to YouTube video about the innards of a racing lockup convertor:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0MJFceb9NHU&t=584s

The more slippage you have in the convertor, the bigger the shock when you lock the clutch. Race cars seem to have a lot more ring and pinion failures when they swap to a lockup convertor from a conventional convertor.

__________________
Brad Yost
1973 T/A (SOLD)
2005 GTO
1984 Grand Prix

100% Pontiacs in my driveway!!! What's in your driveway?

If you don't take some of the RACETRACK home with you, Ya got cheated

  #6  
Old 08-02-2025, 08:20 PM
ponjohn's Avatar
ponjohn ponjohn is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Fort Myers, Fl.
Posts: 9,715
Default

I plan to use a 4l80e, Less than 650 hp.

  #7  
Old 08-03-2025, 11:53 AM
JLMounce JLMounce is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Greeley, Colorado
Posts: 4,540
Send a message via AIM to JLMounce
Default

If I had it to do over again, I would not spend the extra money on a triple disc lockup. For a street car, I rarely use the WOT lockup capability. At that point I’ve just added cost and reciprocal weight.

The triple discs also have very little slip to them at the power levels being discussed here ~600 hp. So they have a somewhat harsh engagement.

Unless you are going racing a lot where the WOT lockup is beneficial, spec a good efficient converter that stalls where you need it to for your engine and still drives positively. It should have a conventional single disc lockup clutch that is used only for cruise operation.

Just my opinion based on my observations and actual usage.

__________________
-Jason
1969 Pontiac Firebird
  #8  
Old 08-03-2025, 08:16 PM
Radman's Avatar
Radman Radman is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Tippecanoe, OH
Posts: 794
Default

My set-up is a 389 Tri-Power, 700R4, and a 2200 stall locking torque converter.
The converter will not lock-up until I am in 4th gear and the manifold vacuum is 13 pounds or greater. I do have a kill switch in the lock-up circuit for the long uphill pulls. Without the kill switch when the engine is loaded, I get the unlock because the vacuum drops below 13, then as soon as unlocks the vacuum goes back up. The kill switch stops the dance. With a 27 inch tire that gives me a 2000 RPM at 70 MPH. Street the car drives fine, and I never get the electronic converter lock-up on the strip.
Oh yea, normal driving I do not get to 4th gear until 40 MPH or better.

__________________
If you built it, drive it.
red 62 Tempest total stock restoration.
white 62 Tempest modified, 61 389 Tri-Power, and a conventional drive train.
  #9  
Old 08-03-2025, 09:18 PM
Goatracer1 Goatracer1 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: NH
Posts: 4,265
Default

I have a multi disc lock up converter and I think it makes a world of difference . I lock it manually and don't use it below 45 mph.

  #10  
Old 08-05-2025, 04:21 AM
Schurkey Schurkey is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: The Seasonally Frozen Wastelands
Posts: 6,346
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JLMounce View Post
I have a fairly wide hysteresis set to keep the converter from cycling on and off.
INCREDIBLY important, and why I was so furious at TCI for selling a converter lock-up kit using a vacuum switch with zero hysteresis.

  #11  
Old 08-05-2025, 02:19 PM
Lee's Avatar
Lee Lee is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Crosby, TX (East of Houston)/Texas/USA
Posts: 2,108
Default

My '69 Falcon wagon had a 4R70W, and I tried a variety of converters in it. I had a controller that allowed me to fine tune the shift points, and the lock-up point.

At the track, the lock up would happen around the 1000' point, and it sounded like I had shifted gears. You can hear it at about the 1:03 point of this video
https://youtu.be/tHpXgrPAKmE?si=lKDv08RFywQ5jueR&t=50

With the OD and lock-up, the car was great on the highway. I think I had set to lock up around 50-55mph. I did 4,400 miles with it on the 2011 Power Tour, and the car averaged nearly 14mpg with 4.10 gears.

__________________
'73 T/A (sold). Low budget stock headed 8.3:1 455, 222/242 116lsa .443/.435 cam. FAST Sportsman EFI, 317rwhp/385rwtq on 87 octane. 13.12 @103.2, 1.91 60'.

'67 Firebird [sold], ; 11.27 @ 119.61, 7.167 @ 96.07, with UD 280/280 (108LSA/ 109 ICL)solid cam. [1.537, 7.233 @93.61, 11.46 @ 115.4 w/ old UD 288/296 108 hydraulic cam] Feb '05 HPP, home-ported "16" D-ports, dished pistons (pump gas only), 3.42 gears, 275/60 DR's, 750DP, T2, full exhaust
  #12  
Old 08-06-2025, 01:50 AM
wakesupremo wakesupremo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Wisbech
Posts: 231
Default

Sorry to hijack this thread. Is there a way of knowing exactly what torque convertor slip you have? My 600 HP stroker has a TCI saturday night special torque convertor in its manual valve bodied TH400. I have been told that I get a lot of slip as my shift light comes on at about 1000ft but have no more gears to shift into. My shift light is set at 5800 , 3.50 gears 27" tyre. Thanks in advance.

  #13  
Old 08-06-2025, 09:37 AM
Lee's Avatar
Lee Lee is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Crosby, TX (East of Houston)/Texas/USA
Posts: 2,108
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wakesupremo View Post
Sorry to hijack this thread. Is there a way of knowing exactly what torque convertor slip you have? My 600 HP stroker has a TCI saturday night special torque convertor in its manual valve bodied TH400. I have been told that I get a lot of slip as my shift light comes on at about 1000ft but have no more gears to shift into. My shift light is set at 5800 , 3.50 gears 27" tyre. Thanks in advance.
Do the math. Calculate what the MPH should be at the RPM when you cross the finish line, and compare that to the actual MPH.

If you are hitting 5800 @ 1000', with those gears and tire size, then I'd expect you to be close to 120mph at the finish line.

__________________
'73 T/A (sold). Low budget stock headed 8.3:1 455, 222/242 116lsa .443/.435 cam. FAST Sportsman EFI, 317rwhp/385rwtq on 87 octane. 13.12 @103.2, 1.91 60'.

'67 Firebird [sold], ; 11.27 @ 119.61, 7.167 @ 96.07, with UD 280/280 (108LSA/ 109 ICL)solid cam. [1.537, 7.233 @93.61, 11.46 @ 115.4 w/ old UD 288/296 108 hydraulic cam] Feb '05 HPP, home-ported "16" D-ports, dished pistons (pump gas only), 3.42 gears, 275/60 DR's, 750DP, T2, full exhaust
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:55 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017