| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Social Groups |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
How many of you all using hybrid coil overs. Top of spring fits in stock spring pocket. Pros cons?
__________________
Skip Fix 1978 Trans Am original owner 10.99 @ 124 pump gas 455 E heads, NO Bird ever! 1981 Black SE Trans Am stockish 6X 400ci, turbo 301 on a stand 1965 GTO 4 barrel 3 speed project 2004 GTO Pulse Red stock motor computer tune [email protected] 1964 Impala SS 409/470ci 600 HP stroker project 1979 Camaro IAII Edelbrock head 500" 695 HP 10.33@132 3595lbs 1964 Corvette Coupe 327 4 speed |
| The Following User Says Thank You to Skip Fix For This Useful Post: | ||
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
I have been pretty vocal against them in the past. I have now for about 9 months been running a set of QA1 Pro Coils.
What I like: They ride really well and it was fairly easy to dial in my ride height precisely. They are definitely an easier overall install than traditional coil springs. Also, I've been able to experiment with a lot of different settings since I opted for double adjustables. I have a really great handling car right now that also rides and handles imperfect roads better than the car ever has. What I don't like: There is still obvious side-loading of the shock that is occurring and I'm not really a fan of it. I don't have enough miles on these to really tell if it's going to be an issue, but I did make sure that I registered my parts for the lifetime warranty, just in case. I also don't really like the rubber stem bushings capturing the shock in the upper mount. Because of the side loading, the stem rubs against those captured rubber bushings and especially over speed humps, they make a good bit of noise. I haven't been easy on these and so far they have exceeded my expectations. I still think adding either a SpeedTech Chicane mount or Global West's coil-over mount to the subframe and using a true coil-over is still the best bet. But if you can't or won't do that, I think they are a great alternative.
__________________
-Jason 1969 Pontiac Firebird |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thanks Jason. I put them on the 64 vette project. even with the spring all the way down it was had to get them to bolt to the GW lower A arms made for coil overs. Then quite a job screwing it up to get the spring loaded for ride height even with the roller plates and anti seize and moly on it. Not much miles yet as EFI getting sorted out. pondering them on the 65 GTO project and maybe 409 64 impala project.
vasriabel rate spring like some of the first kits were or one set rate?
__________________
Skip Fix 1978 Trans Am original owner 10.99 @ 124 pump gas 455 E heads, NO Bird ever! 1981 Black SE Trans Am stockish 6X 400ci, turbo 301 on a stand 1965 GTO 4 barrel 3 speed project 2004 GTO Pulse Red stock motor computer tune [email protected] 1964 Impala SS 409/470ci 600 HP stroker project 1979 Camaro IAII Edelbrock head 500" 695 HP 10.33@132 3595lbs 1964 Corvette Coupe 327 4 speed |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
That would likely aid in installation, and I'm told it's positioning also helps with the side loading issue I previously discussed. I didn't have a huge issue installing these on my SPC arms which have a flat base for T-Bar mounting. However, the SPC arm shock mount location is also altered slightly to help with motion ratio. That may have made it a bit easier to install on my end. I went with single rate springs. 600lb rate in my case.
__________________
-Jason 1969 Pontiac Firebird |
| Reply |
|
|