Pontiac - Race The next Level

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 10-24-2007, 06:28 AM
BDHABT's Avatar
BDHABT BDHABT is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Plainville,CT
Posts: 623
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by ponjohn
You're the only person who I know of who has a negative experience with Bill. He treated me very well, he is a straight shooter and very meticulous.

Until he retires; he is my machinist for as long as I am involved with cars.
Ditto.

__________________
`70 Firebird,Original Owner car

Ken French Built Chassis

Carlquist Competition Engines IA2 505
Competition CNC Ported Super Chiefs
CCE Ported Gustram
Twin Dominators from Shaker 455
963 HP


`09 Electra Glide Standard.

`03 F-350 7.3 6-speed 4x4 Crew Cab Dually.
  #22  
Old 10-24-2007, 06:32 AM
BDHABT's Avatar
BDHABT BDHABT is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Plainville,CT
Posts: 623
Default

John,I know you said you want to keep your hood,but if you ever want to try a Victor and a Dominator on the new combo,let me know.I wont be using it for a while.

Mark.

__________________
`70 Firebird,Original Owner car

Ken French Built Chassis

Carlquist Competition Engines IA2 505
Competition CNC Ported Super Chiefs
CCE Ported Gustram
Twin Dominators from Shaker 455
963 HP


`09 Electra Glide Standard.

`03 F-350 7.3 6-speed 4x4 Crew Cab Dually.
  #23  
Old 10-24-2007, 06:45 AM
smagnotti smagnotti is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: new york
Posts: 669
Default

Ponjohn, I in no way posted what I did to belttle you, or to piss you off. A lot of unknowing folks here seem to take their engine shops word for gold, with out knowing the rest of the details they need on the so call info they payed good money for, and with out you posting the test pressure it was conducted at I just assume you did not kmow the importance of that detail.

__________________
SJM
  #24  
Old 10-24-2007, 07:15 AM
ponjohn's Avatar
ponjohn ponjohn is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Fort Myers, Fl.
Posts: 9,715
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BDHABT
John,I know you said you want to keep your hood,but if you ever want to try a Victor and a Dominator on the new combo,let me know.I wont be using it for a while.

Mark.
mark-

Thanks, I will probably end up going to a Pontiac shaped cowl hood . LTD fiberglass on Ebay quoted me 800 for a bolt on with low tension springs.

This hobby is a hoot, a simple cylinder head change snow balls into a 4500.00 project, headers, hood, intake, prob a new carb.......HAHAHAH....LOL.

I would like to do it in stages to get the most info possible on what changes produce the most benefit.

  #25  
Old 10-24-2007, 07:17 AM
ponjohn's Avatar
ponjohn ponjohn is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Fort Myers, Fl.
Posts: 9,715
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by smagnotti
Ponjohn, I in no way posted what I did to belttle you, or to piss you off. A lot of unknowing folks here seem to take their engine shops word for gold, with out knowing the rest of the details they need on the so call info they payed good money for, and with out you posting the test pressure it was conducted at I just assume you did not kmow the importance of that detail.
I understand and as i stated i did not have the info. I am not bothering him for the info either. It would be just another phone call, he is always busy and it is not important to me right now.

What I have learned is: to reap the full reward from any round port head the Victor is probably the intake of choice.

Thanks-
John

  #26  
Old 10-24-2007, 10:17 AM
gearbanger's Avatar
gearbanger gearbanger is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,403
Default

I don't mean to hijack the thread, but I have a rpm intake and 310 KRE heads. I went to the strip again this weekend after switching from 1-5/8" headers to 2" headers and gained nothing. The weather was pretty much the same last year and it was on almost the same day in October last year. So I am thinking my restriction is on the other end of the motor too. I have a stock port matched RPM with a 750 Proform/Holley double pump. Would a victor and a bigger carb set me free???!!!

  #27  
Old 10-24-2007, 11:30 AM
70 lucerne lemans's Avatar
70 lucerne lemans 70 lucerne lemans is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Lake Mary,Fl
Posts: 1,374
Default

I just switched to a victor/dominator from a T2/850.I only had it out once so far and it was running really fat and bad air,my 60' was off ,mph picked up a little.I think once I get it dialed in it will pick up,this is my race only Firebird.However in a street strip car I dont think you can beat a RPM or T2,unless you have a 500"+ motor or a .650+ lift cam. I dont think I have enough cam to really take advantage of the intake and head flow.

__________________
Mark

1970 Lemans Convertible,462,6x-4, 234/242 cam.3.42 posi.12.55@109,4100 lbs...SOLD....


1968 Firebird , 467 , KRE d-ports ,stock type suspension,3100lbs
(1.30 60')(6.08 1/8)(113.43)different runs 9.59 @140.71 on E85 all motor
[email protected] on 150 shot
  #28  
Old 10-24-2007, 12:36 PM
BILTIT's Avatar
BILTIT BILTIT is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: sask, canada
Posts: 3,777
Default

I will be trying a victor/850 next summer in place of my RPM/850 combo now, i do alot of street driving so we will see how it runs. I would also like to try a TII. I was told that the RPM was limiting the breathing of my motor but who knows i guess. I am thinking the victor will be too much but the TII might be just right. Heck, i might just try them all on a dyno first and then at the track.

__________________
Derek B.
Current best: 11.97@110 1.65-60' !!!

'74 ventura, (Fired july 14/06) '74 462 4-bolt (9.5-1), SCAT, Ross, T-II w/850DP (shaker455), TH350, Conti 10'' 3800, Supercomps, Magnaflow, 3'' Pypes, 3.73's, 28x13.5-15 ET streets.

1970 Beismeyer 17' flatbottom vdrive, 11.8:1 455P, ported heads, dual Qjet tunnel ram.
  #29  
Old 10-24-2007, 12:39 PM
Ron H's Avatar
Ron H Ron H is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Great White North
Posts: 5,807
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gearbanger
I don't mean to hijack the thread, but I have a rpm intake and 310 KRE heads. I went to the strip again this weekend after switching from 1-5/8" headers to 2" headers and gained nothing. The weather was pretty much the same last year and it was on almost the same day in October last year. So I am thinking my restriction is on the other end of the motor too. I have a stock port matched RPM with a 750 Proform/Holley double pump. Would a victor and a bigger carb set me free???!!!
310's on a 462? The carb will definately be suspect. I don't have actual swap data to say how much I gained for swapping from an rpm and 800 Q-jet to a Victor / Dominator.
I do't have the q-jet anymore. I would be willing to go to the chasis dyno with my car. Run it as is now, then swap the RPM on if I can find a carb. Just to see the difference.
I alo switched from Doug's 1 3/4" headers to 2" hedmans and didn't see much difference. But I believe I did gain some MPH. I think the change probably produced a bit more HP but it definately pushed the whole power band up the hill 300-400 rpm.
I think the reason I didn't see as much difference as i had thought is I am at 5000+ DA which drops around 18% power off the top. So if I was at sea level and actually making 600 HP, I would have seen the difference more than making 510 here.

__________________
68 Firebird
Are you running with the wind or breaking it?
  #30  
Old 10-24-2007, 02:52 PM
70 lucerne lemans's Avatar
70 lucerne lemans 70 lucerne lemans is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Lake Mary,Fl
Posts: 1,374
Default

I'm going to have a port matched T2 and street dominator for sale,along with a 850 holley that has been tricked out.It is good enough for 10.59 on my firebird.The intakes are port matched to 310 cfm KRE heads.

__________________
Mark

1970 Lemans Convertible,462,6x-4, 234/242 cam.3.42 posi.12.55@109,4100 lbs...SOLD....


1968 Firebird , 467 , KRE d-ports ,stock type suspension,3100lbs
(1.30 60')(6.08 1/8)(113.43)different runs 9.59 @140.71 on E85 all motor
[email protected] on 150 shot
  #31  
Old 10-24-2007, 09:05 PM
gearbanger's Avatar
gearbanger gearbanger is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,403
Default

I'd be interested in that 850. I'll PM you.

  #32  
Old 10-24-2007, 09:25 PM
BruceWilkie BruceWilkie is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 9,132
Default

Dual Planes like the RPM do like big carbs. Partly cause only 2 barrels to feed a runner and larger throttle bore allows mixture to turn into the runners easier due to lower velocity. Think about it the SBC 40 years ago was running a highrise dual plane and the Holley 950 Three barrel carb on typical 302-327. Back then was the hot setup.

  #33  
Old 10-24-2007, 09:42 PM
Tom Vaught's Avatar
Tom Vaught Tom Vaught is offline
Boost Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The United States of America
Posts: 31,302
Default

Some years ago I flowed a set of edelbrock heads with minimal intake port work that flowed 300 cfm at 28" of water on a SF 1200 bench that was calibrated to be within 1% of Ford's 3 million dollar bench.

http://www.flowsystemsinc.com/index_products.htm Then click on automotive then on Intake and exhaust manifold and cylinder head.

That being said, the VICTOR 850 Intake flowed within 1% of the head and the Victor 1050 flowed with-in 2%. The RPM was with-in 3% of the head. 97% times a 300 cfm head is a 297 cfm Intake. A Pretty Good Intake.

I also flowed a lot of other heads and intakes over a two day period. The Torquer II flowed about 262 cfm.

Tom V.

__________________
"Engineers do stuff for reasons" Tom Vaught

Despite small distractions, there are those who will go Forward, Learning, Sharing Knowledge, Doing what they can to help others move forward.
  #34  
Old 10-24-2007, 10:47 PM
SLICK1 SLICK1 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,045
Arrow

Quote:
Originally Posted by BruceWilkie
Hmmm saw an article somewhere suggesting flowing the intake from the carb flange and blocking all but one runner at a time. I laughed it off but maybe Ponjon's guy took it seriously.

NOT porting your head and intake as a team(and in the direction of normal flow) makes for a lot of work that may not produce desirable results.

Bryce Mulvey of Dr.Js performance is the guy who prepares & ports the intakes in this manner, it was featured in the Engine Masters/Popular Hot Rodding issue several months ago! It is one way to go about it that does truly isolate the runner being worked on regardless of which way the air is flowing to me?

__________________


(see it in action)

http://video.tinypic.com/player.php?v=2sbpmkm
  #35  
Old 10-24-2007, 11:20 PM
7T2 7T2 is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: SW MO
Posts: 788
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Vaught
97% times a 300 cfm head is a 297 cfm Intake. A Pretty Good Intake.

Tom V.
respect your knowledge and enjoy your posts-
97% of 300 is 291- still a pretty good intake

jim

  #36  
Old 10-25-2007, 01:17 AM
70judgeconv 70judgeconv is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: prospect ct
Posts: 311
Default

I went from race demon 750 to a holley 950 ultra on a rpm intake and 250 cfm heads with super sucker carb spacer and picked up .13 in 1/4 and a little over a mile an hour.

  #37  
Old 10-25-2007, 06:54 AM
smagnotti smagnotti is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: new york
Posts: 669
Default

Now lets get into the point of this discussion where we enter fuel into the the airstream thru the manifold, as it would be nice to have the correct amount of fuel to match the 297 cfm of the P rpm manifold.
My say is that the TK II with a 1 inch spacer, even saddled with a bit smaller carb will out power the P RPM manifold above 4000 rpm.

__________________
SJM
  #38  
Old 10-25-2007, 10:40 AM
Steve C. Steve C. is online now
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Liberty Hill, Tx. (Austin)
Posts: 10,923
Default

Of interest, when I dyno tested various intakes on my old 462cid combo the Torker II intake flopped ! But to be fair it was a borrowed brand new intake that was not port matched to my heads, the other intakes were. It has small ports as cast and I suspect the results show the importance of properly port matching a intake to the heads in use.

Performer RPM intake w/ 1/2" spacer and HP950 carb:
4000 rpm- 423.2 hp
5800 rpm- 580.2 hp
Torker II w/ 1/2" spacer and HP950 carb:
4000 rpm- 398.1 hp
5700 rpm- 566.6 hp

  #39  
Old 10-25-2007, 12:42 PM
smagnotti smagnotti is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: new york
Posts: 669
Default

Yes, I was assuming both manifols where port matched to the heads with what I posted.

__________________
SJM
  #40  
Old 10-25-2007, 01:49 PM
Skip Fix's Avatar
Skip Fix Skip Fix is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Katy,TX USA
Posts: 21,707
Default

As a footnote Steve how was the Torker vs your Dave Bisshop Holley intake on that motor?

As Steve said the Torker II has some pretty narrow ports. I borrowed Steve's Holley when dynoing my pump gas 455. I also had a Torker II I had to weld the ports taller and spent ALOT of time blending the runners up from the gasket surface, measuring width and height and blending some more. That Torker II and the Dave Bisshop modified Holley intake of Steve's were almost identical dyno numbers. Both had the 3/8" open spacer I can fit under my Shaker.

The height of the RPM we weren't going to use it on my car so it wasn't dynoed.

One other thing about the Torker II it flowed more even between cylinders than any intake other than the Victor I've checked.

__________________
Skip Fix
1978 Trans Am original owner 10.99 @ 124 pump gas 455 E heads, NO Bird ever!
1981 Black SE Trans Am stockish 6X 400ci, turbo 301 on a stand
1965 GTO 4 barrel 3 speed project
2004 GTO Pulse Red stock motor computer tune [email protected]
1964 Impala SS 409/470ci 600 HP stroker project
1979 Camaro IAII Edelbrock head 500" 695 HP 10.33@132 3595lbs
1964 Corvette Coupe 327 4 speed
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:11 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017