Pontiac - Street No question too basic here!

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 01-09-2020, 03:54 PM
455abody 455abody is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 154
Default

It started a easier today when cold but had to feather the gas for a couple minutes it was wanting to die. Once warmed up i hooked my vac gauge up and the most manifold vac I could get was 15 by adjusting the bottom carb screws. Advanced my timing to 12 or 13 baseline took for a drive I could hear some light pinging when I stepped on it. I then backed off to 8-10. I think I need a pro to check out.

  #22  
Old 01-09-2020, 10:11 PM
Will Will is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Pugetopolis
Posts: 5,297
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by moontower69 View Post
That's my experience. Ported is bs emissions creation of early 70s and will just increase your operating temps at the stoplight big time. Ported takes a good running engine and makes it run hotter and hurts throttle response.

Like Cliff said, once you get it tuned properly, manifold should be fine unless cam selection is way off (ie, too much duration for the compression ratio and combo of car and gearing)
I think you may have misinterpreted what Cliff wrote. This was discussed rather extensively pretty recently here on the forum so the thread shouldn't be too hard to find.

Your experience and mine are somewhat opposite. I've used ported vacuum successfully on several engines and prefer it to a manifold source. Never have had overheating or any other issues.

__________________
----------------------------
'72 Formula 400 Lucerne Blue, Blue Deluxe interior - My first car!
'73 Firebird 350/4-speed Black on Black, mix & match.
  #23  
Old 01-10-2020, 07:30 AM
steve25's Avatar
steve25 steve25 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Westchester NY
Posts: 17,511
Default

When are you hearing this light pining, when your stepping on it enough to be into the secondary's?

Since you have a vacuum gauge install a longer hose on it so you can read it while driving and report back as to the vacuum reading you see when the pinging starts to take place.

I would wager a bet that you need a tad fatter jetting, not less timing!

__________________
Wernher Von Braun warned before his retirement from NASA back in 1972, that the next world war would be against the ETs!
And he was not talking about 1/8 or 1/4 mile ETs!

1) 1940s 100% silver 4 cup tea server set.

Two dry rotted 14 x 10 Micky Thompson slicks.

1) un-mailed in gift coupon from a 1972 box of corn flakes.
Two pairs of brown leather flip flops, never seen more then 2 mph.

Education is what your left with once you forget things!
  #24  
Old 01-10-2020, 11:17 AM
tc's Avatar
tc tc is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Iowa
Posts: 808
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 455abody View Post
It started a easier today when cold but had to feather the gas for a couple minutes it was wanting to die. .
Now you need to adjust the open distance of the choke blade and fast idle rpm.

As for having advance vacuum at idle, I adjust my Holley carbs for a square transition slot opening before I place the carb on the engine. This carb needed more throttle opening without the advance vacuum. Having the added degrees of timing at idle leaves the throttle blades showing a square of the t slots.

  #25  
Old 01-10-2020, 02:36 PM
moontower69's Avatar
moontower69 moontower69 is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 526
Default ported idle temps

"I've used ported vacuum successfully on several engines and prefer it to a manifold source. Never have had overheating or any other issues."

I don't dispute your experience at all. I'm simply saying it's a verifiable fact if you "A-B test" that ported leads to higher idle temps v manifold.

Why, because less timing at idle increases engine temp. That's all. You have way more knowledge and experience than me and I'm not trying to question that or start the endless debate about ported v manifold.

Your preference for ported is valid but it doesn't change fact that ported increases idle temps. Not an ego issue for me, just factual statement.

__________________
1974 Lemans Sportecoupe GT (daily driver)

.030 over 354, #47 heads (84cc), Lunati voodoo 700 camshaft (207/213 @ .050), logs, 2.5 duals, X-pipe and Dynomax super turbo mufflers, 3.08 rear
  #26  
Old 01-10-2020, 03:14 PM
steve25's Avatar
steve25 steve25 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Westchester NY
Posts: 17,511
Default

Fact! Only a mis tuned/ Camed motor would need any sort of vacuum advance added in at rpms below 1200.

Fact! Added timing put in by means of vacuum advance will always make a motor run cooler and efficient fuel wise at part throttle cruse !

Part throttle is the reason , at part throttle above idle the minimal charge takes much longer to burn hence the need for more timing advance.

__________________
Wernher Von Braun warned before his retirement from NASA back in 1972, that the next world war would be against the ETs!
And he was not talking about 1/8 or 1/4 mile ETs!

1) 1940s 100% silver 4 cup tea server set.

Two dry rotted 14 x 10 Micky Thompson slicks.

1) un-mailed in gift coupon from a 1972 box of corn flakes.
Two pairs of brown leather flip flops, never seen more then 2 mph.

Education is what your left with once you forget things!
  #27  
Old 01-10-2020, 04:22 PM
Kenth's Avatar
Kenth Kenth is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Kingdom of Sweden
Posts: 6,093
Default

If you run around cruising at idle speeds you certainly can have a heating problem with a ported source for the ignition vacuum advance.
Most of us are running above idle speeds going somewhere and can enjoy normal engine temperatures due to an activated vacuum advance, ported or constant vacuum source.
The only difference is that using a ported source and a properly adjusted carburetor idle/low speed circuit you donīt have to chase a certain ignition vacuum advance curve at idle speed due to all sorts of engine modifications, hotter camshafts etc.
Above idle speed and part throttle you will always have an activated vacuum advance.

__________________
1966 GTO Tri-Power
1970 GTO TheJudge
http://www.poci.org/
http://gtoaa.org/
  #28  
Old 01-10-2020, 04:27 PM
ta man ta man is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Clinton,Ontario,Canada
Posts: 5,544
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by moontower69 View Post
"I've used ported vacuum successfully on several engines and prefer it to a manifold source. Never have had overheating or any other issues."

I don't dispute your experience at all. I'm simply saying it's a verifiable fact if you "A-B test" that ported leads to higher idle temps v manifold.

Why, because less timing at idle increases engine temp. That's all. You have way more knowledge and experience than me and I'm not trying to question that or start the endless debate about ported v manifold.

Your preference for ported is valid but it doesn't change fact that ported increases idle temps. Not an ego issue for me, just factual statement.
Every engine is different..mine will not tolerate manifold vacuum..But I've had other engines that like manifold vacuum ..there are no rights or wrongs.

__________________

466 Mike Voycey shortblock, 310cfm SD KRE heads, SD "OF 2.0 cam", torker 2,generic one inch open spacer
373 gears 3200 Continental Convertor
best et 10.679/127.5/1.533 60ft
308 gears best et 10.76/125.64/1.5471
  #29  
Old 01-11-2020, 06:08 PM
Will Will is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Pugetopolis
Posts: 5,297
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ta man View Post
Every engine is different..mine will not tolerate manifold vacuum..But I've had other engines that like manifold vacuum ..there are no rights or wrongs.
If my engine likes 16 degrees timing at idle there are a couple ways I can get there. I can run a long mechanical curve that starts at 6 degrees and add 10 degrees of vacuum advance at idle with a manifold source or I can run a shorter mechanical curve that starts at 16 degrees with a ported vacuum source. Engine idle temps will be the same either way.

I've not had an engine that wanted more than 16-18 degrees at idle but I've never run what most would consider a "big" cam either. 232 @ .050" in a 400 is as big as i've gone.

Just curious here - how many people have hooked up a gauge and measured vacuum at idle and found that vacuum increased beyond about 16 degrees of timing? If you did see an increase, where did it stop increasing and what was the combination?

I submit that if your engine runs cooler at idle with the timing advanced well beyond the point where vacuum stops increasing your carb probably needs some work.

__________________
----------------------------
'72 Formula 400 Lucerne Blue, Blue Deluxe interior - My first car!
'73 Firebird 350/4-speed Black on Black, mix & match.
  #30  
Old 01-12-2020, 04:48 AM
Kenth's Avatar
Kenth Kenth is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Kingdom of Sweden
Posts: 6,093
Default

Most 1967 and earlier Pontiac V8īs (and others) run with constant vacuum to the ignition vacuum advance, 6° initial + 20° vacuum advance, total 26° at idle from factory.
These engines also got a somewhat quicker centrifugal advance, to 2-3000 rpmīs, than later engines to keep the engine happy at part-throttle.
Camshafts used produced enough vacuum to keep the vacuum advance happy fully activated at idle.

__________________
1966 GTO Tri-Power
1970 GTO TheJudge
http://www.poci.org/
http://gtoaa.org/
  #31  
Old 01-12-2020, 08:14 AM
steve25's Avatar
steve25 steve25 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Westchester NY
Posts: 17,511
Default

Unless you have a very under Camed big cid motor you will find that most Cams with a Intake duration of above 228@ .050" will make more vacuum above idle, then at idle and that is the determining factor along with compression ratio for being able to run full Manifold vacuum or not.

__________________
Wernher Von Braun warned before his retirement from NASA back in 1972, that the next world war would be against the ETs!
And he was not talking about 1/8 or 1/4 mile ETs!

1) 1940s 100% silver 4 cup tea server set.

Two dry rotted 14 x 10 Micky Thompson slicks.

1) un-mailed in gift coupon from a 1972 box of corn flakes.
Two pairs of brown leather flip flops, never seen more then 2 mph.

Education is what your left with once you forget things!
  #32  
Old 01-12-2020, 09:04 AM
Cliff R's Avatar
Cliff R Cliff R is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Mount Vernon, Ohio 43050
Posts: 18,153
Default

"Every engine is different..mine will not tolerate manifold vacuum..But I've had other engines that like manifold vacuum ..there are no rights or wrongs."

My current and last 455 were not fond of running a lot of timing at idle speed. They roar to life instantly after shut-down and idle smooth, produce plenty of vacuum and the tach barely moves when the trans is placed in gear. If I move over to manifold vacuum to the advance they start to "skip" and "miss" slightly and generally just unhappy with all that timing on them.

I can re-adjust the mixture screws slightly and idle speed but then I'm left with more drop in RPM when the trans is placed in gear and slight "skip" in the exhaust note that is not present when running less timing at idle speed.

The engines that have been brought here for running issues that liked, wanted and responded well to a butt-ton of timing at idle speed have all been lower compression and "hefty" sized cams in them. So there may be scenarios where you can improve things some running the timing off the scale at idle speed. The problem one quickly runs into when doing this is that the VA being used will require a very low cut-in point as engines with low compression and hefty cams may not produce enough vacuum at idle speed to effectively operate most VA units. They make VA units that are adjustable for spring tension and cut-in points for this purpose. I don't like or use them here, I much prefer the VA units that control how much timing is added instead, but they are becoming more difficult to find these days......Cliff

__________________
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If you can read this in English, thank a Veteran!
https://cliffshighperformance.com/
73 Ventura, SOLD 455, 3740lbs, 11.30's at 120mph, 1977 Pontiac Q-jet, HO intake, HEI, 10" converter, 3.42 gears, DOT's, 7.20's at 96mph and still WAY under the roll bar rule. Best ET to date 7.18 at 97MPH (1/8th mile),
  #33  
Old 01-12-2020, 01:35 PM
ta man ta man is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Clinton,Ontario,Canada
Posts: 5,544
Default

A good idle in park with an easy transisition into gear with a strong idle in gear is what I try and achieve.
More often than not on these threads we see guys discussing trying to achieve a "good idle" when they are in park and in a garage.
To me a good idle is when you are sitting at a stop sign or a traffic light and the engine has a strong idle not barfing all over itself or surging.
My normal routine is get the car running decent pull it out of the shop..drive a mile to the stop sign readjust idle speed and idle mixture screws if needed. Drive another 10 miles get some heat into the engine at highway speeds. Pull into my neighborhood Coin wash..readjust again. Sometimes it takes a bit especially if tuning an engine for the first time.

__________________

466 Mike Voycey shortblock, 310cfm SD KRE heads, SD "OF 2.0 cam", torker 2,generic one inch open spacer
373 gears 3200 Continental Convertor
best et 10.679/127.5/1.533 60ft
308 gears best et 10.76/125.64/1.5471
  #34  
Old 01-13-2020, 12:20 AM
Cliff R's Avatar
Cliff R Cliff R is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Mount Vernon, Ohio 43050
Posts: 18,153
Default

You nailed that deal down, and why I use and prefer to run less timing at idle and throttle plates opened a tad further. I can superficially tune most set-ups for smoother idle by adding a butt-ton of timing at idle, but many will have the throttle plates so far closed that it becomes difficult to establish a stable idle in and out of gear when a slight load is placed on the engine. I want to see very little RPM drop when the trans is placed in gear, and rock solid idle quality in gear when the vehicle is stopped. This only happens when final tuning is done with the engine fully heat soaked.

One major problem I see here with troubled vehicles brought for custom tuning is some "creep" in the advance curve right at idle speed. If you have spring in the mechanical advance that are allowing any timing in at idle speed it's going to be difficult to tune and you will see much greater RPM changes in and out of gear. You'd be surprised how many vehicles have been brought here for carburetors issues that were fixed by putting stronger springs in the distributor or throwing all that imported advance curve crap out and putting stock parts back in them......Cliff

__________________
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If you can read this in English, thank a Veteran!
https://cliffshighperformance.com/
73 Ventura, SOLD 455, 3740lbs, 11.30's at 120mph, 1977 Pontiac Q-jet, HO intake, HEI, 10" converter, 3.42 gears, DOT's, 7.20's at 96mph and still WAY under the roll bar rule. Best ET to date 7.18 at 97MPH (1/8th mile),
  #35  
Old 01-21-2020, 05:24 PM
RWS RWS is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: MB, Canada
Posts: 187
Default

The factory port for vacuum on a Q-Jet is located at the bottom of the back of the carb, and that's probably the best place to attach the hose from the distributor.

If I recall correctly, though, Q-Jets don't have ported vacuum at all, and so no matter where you plug in the hose you are running vacuum advance all the time unless your engine has a functional TCS solenoid, in which case you'd only get vacuum advance in certain gears (third and fourth on a manual transmission car).

  #36  
Old 01-21-2020, 05:57 PM
455abody 455abody is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 154
Default

My newly rebuilt poncho is coming along,I was able to get the factory choke working that was a relief. The timing curve seems off with the new engine.I am running a Mallory Unilite distributor. I ordered a new spring set to install some lighter springs. Then I found out it would take an act of God to install them.You have to dismantle the whole bottom part of the unit to put in a stop bushing and new springs.Plus it is 20 years old so I made the call to DUI and ordered a custom unit from Steve for the 455. The car is running and starting smooth but lacking the punch of the old motor with bearings that were worn to the copper. I hope the new DUI distributor can help me in the power department. It sure nice to have it back in the garage. Thanks for all your good advice, Brian

  #37  
Old 01-21-2020, 07:01 PM
Will Will is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Pugetopolis
Posts: 5,297
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RWS View Post
The factory port for vacuum on a Q-Jet is located at the bottom of the back of the carb, and that's probably the best place to attach the hose from the distributor.

If I recall correctly, though, Q-Jets don't have ported vacuum at all, ...
Some Q-jets most definitely do have ported vacuum ports. Cliff wrote rather extensively about ported vacuum and where the source for it is on a Q-jet in a post not long ago on this subject.

__________________
----------------------------
'72 Formula 400 Lucerne Blue, Blue Deluxe interior - My first car!
'73 Firebird 350/4-speed Black on Black, mix & match.
  #38  
Old 01-22-2020, 12:17 AM
Greg Reid's Avatar
Greg Reid Greg Reid is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Palmetto, GA. USA
Posts: 16,177
Default

They definitely have ported vacuum. I'm using it on my car and have used it on the last two Q-jets I used. Front lower passenger side.

__________________
Greg Reid
Palmetto, Georgia

  #39  
Old 01-22-2020, 04:26 AM
Kenth's Avatar
Kenth Kenth is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Kingdom of Sweden
Posts: 6,093
Default

Front lower passenger side in throttle plate is the EGR port, this port is too weak for the ignition vacuum advance since it is a bleed off port.
However, it can be used if the bleed off hole/slot is closed.

The regular port for ignition vacuum advance is on drivers side, right above the idle mixture screw.
This port is for most units ported/timed, and for others it is a constant vacuum port, check location of slot, if below blade it is constant, if above it is ported.

__________________
1966 GTO Tri-Power
1970 GTO TheJudge
http://www.poci.org/
http://gtoaa.org/
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Kenth For This Useful Post:
  #40  
Old 01-22-2020, 10:52 AM
Formulajones's Avatar
Formulajones Formulajones is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 11,920
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kenth View Post
Front lower passenger side in throttle plate is the EGR port, this port is too weak for the ignition vacuum advance since it is a bleed off port.
However, it can be used if the bleed off hole/slot is closed.

The regular port for ignition vacuum advance is on drivers side, right above the idle mixture screw.
This port is for most units ported/timed, and for others it is a constant vacuum port, check location of slot, if below blade it is constant, if above it is ported.
Correct, there are some units that simply don't have a ported source for the vacuum advance.

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:13 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017