[Alvin]

Originally Posted by Mr_GTO

Well Pontiac did try at least a little back then.....they were a bit more successful in 2005/2006 with the GTO R.

Yes

Originally Posted by Alvin

[A.J.]

Originally Posted by MikeNoun

I actually see a little of the Volt in that back end.

With those rearlights it locks like a Nissan soapcup plastic racer. Nice car otherwise.

[Alvin]

Originally Posted by Mr_GTO

Speaking of disregarding 7 year old(er) tech, why the same induction and bracing system as this from 2007 Mustang GT-H?

[Mr_GTO]

Originally Posted by Alvin

Speaking of disregarding 7 year old(er) tech, why the same induction and bracing system as this from 2007 Mustang GT-H?

Not sure what you're asking. Are you asking why GM is incorporating this into the Z/28 now when Shelby did it 7 years ago?

[Alvin]

Originally Posted by Mr_GTO

Not sure what you're asking. Are you asking why GM is incorporating this into the Z/28 now when Shelby did it 7 years ago?

BINGO! Based on your "...Who care what happened xx years ago?"

[Alvin]

Note the front strut suspension also same tech as Vintage FORD. So...?

[Wareagle]

Even NUNZI mentioned that under the hood the new LS stuff looks like a washing machine - give me a street version of Roger Bolligers T/A Anyday - Pontiac power

[Alvin]

Originally Posted by Wareagle

Even NUNZI mentioned that under the hood the new LS stuff looks like a washing machine - give me a street version of Roger Bolligers T/A Anyday - Pontiac power

Exactly...and this too (below)

Originally Posted by Formulabruce

70's

[salem1912]

What if? http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=242 http://www.transamdepot.com/the_gto_judge.html or just for MaryAnn http://www.transamdepot.com/6t9_trans_am.html

[Transporter]

Eh, the car leaves me kinda numb, yeah it's got a go-fast pedigree, but it just doesn't make me want to go right out and buy one, regardless who makes it.

One other note, ever notice how much the the words "refreshed or restyled" are used? and there really is almost no difference in the way this looks over any of the other new Camaro's.

To me, a refresh is the difference between a 61/62 Tempest and a 63, or a 64 Cat vs a 65, the only thing that looks different on most of these new cars are the plastic bumpers.

[GTOnly70]

Guess I'm in the minority, but I like it. And I like the nod to the '66 Impala/Caprice tail light treatment - a much cleaner look than the squarish Transformer-based C7 rear end...

I agree with the earlier post about the blind spots and the cramped quarters, though. I sat in a new Camaro last year, and at 6'0", my head was practically touching the headliner. Blinds spots galore made it feel like I was sitting in a tank.

Still, I could probably learn to live with the interior. That's a helluva lot of car (and engineering) for the money.

[Mr_GTO]

Originally Posted by Alvin

BINGO! Based on your "...Who care what happened xx years ago?"

[Mr_GTO]

Originally Posted by Alvin

Note the front strut suspension also same tech as Vintage FORD. So...?

honestly you're going there?

[Old Blue 66]

Originally Posted by Mr_GTO

As a lawyer you don't ask questions you don't already know the answer to.

I wish you would stop posting. You're making a fool out of yourself.

Is it really unknown that a thread like this will generate negative feedback? Is that why you started it? Just so you could argue a few facts about Chevy's on PONTIAC board?? Really? Do you not have better thing to do with your life?

[BlueGTO]

For the money you would think you would get diffrent wider fenders and not some tacked on wheel flares. /shrug

[Firedup6975]

Originally Posted by Old Blue 66

I wish you would stop posting. You're making a fool out of yourself.

Is it really unknown that a thread like this will generate negative feedback? Is that why you started it? Just so you could argue a few facts about Chevy's on PONTIAC board?? Really? Do you not have better thing to do with your life?

Paul everyone is entitled to their opinions Let's not be an angry bird, and start personal attacks, or I'll have no choice but to move this to the clubhouse. Chillax Paul

[Firedup6975]

Originally Posted by salem1912

What if? http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=242 http://www.transamdepot.com/the_gto_judge.html or just for MaryAnn http://www.transamdepot.com/6t9_trans_am.html

Still built on the C. Car platform yuk!! I don't like those recreations. When my 69 TA Tribute car is done it will be #690. Those recreations remind me of a Muscle Machines diecast toy car.

[428RA4]

This front end begins with a U and ends in a GLY.

Reminds me of a 70's chevy chevette.

The worst thing about the new Z-28 is that they STILL have that gross blue dash lighting. For god's sake, change that garbage GM~!

[GT182]

GM has a one track mind these days.... fugly cars. Especially the Camaro. Inside is the worst I've seen since the 80s Camaros. I've rode in one of these new ones, and that was the first and last time... never again.

[bird72]

Nightmare Future Vision:
Hot Rodding will diminish to the lowest allowable level of government permissable modifications.

Joe: "Harry, do you like my new Camaro?"
Harry, "Yeah, but if was mine, I would change those really cool twin black plastic engine covers for extra cool red ones!"
Joe: "Yeah, Harry, I wonder what is under them?"
Harry: "Beats Me! But I'm not afraid to find out when I mount the red ones!"
Joe: "Maybe you should post a thread on an internet forum asking what the best way to change them is?"
Harry: "Think I should post a Chevy thread on PerformaceYears?"
Joe: "Sure!"