Pontiac - Race The next Level

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-18-2024, 01:05 PM
grandam1979 grandam1979 is online now
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ohio, Findlay
Posts: 1,437
Default Rotation resistance??

Does anyone check torque needed to turn a rotating assembly after being assembled? Just bottom end no cam and chain. What did you get?

  #2  
Old 02-18-2024, 01:28 PM
PAUL K's Avatar
PAUL K PAUL K is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sugar Grove IL USA
Posts: 6,353
Default

We do all the time. Usually just the assembled rotating assembly. Type of cam bearings and core diameter will affect the amount of friction along with the cam drive set up. Not long ago we had two identical short blocks that came together at the same time. One had a trick ring pack and the other used a basic performance ring set up. Going from memory the trick set up required 22 lbs/ft to rotate the engine and the other was 34.

__________________
Go fast, see Elvis!
www.facebook.com/PaulKnippensMuscleMotors
The Following User Says Thank You to PAUL K For This Useful Post:
  #3  
Old 02-18-2024, 02:28 PM
Half-Inch Stud's Avatar
Half-Inch Stud Half-Inch Stud is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: BlueBell, PA or AL U.S.A.
Posts: 18,476
Default

Home builds can use a Go// No-go method. Many / every time i check short block TQ resistance, there is a purpose to see about a few tings;

During MainCap install, and particularly the Thrust Cap. So that means #4 Cap install plud another Cap, to get the feel of what causes a rotation bind. Once resolved, then all .caps go on and rotational TQ is dead smooth. Rear Seal is minor if 1-piece. Rope adds a bit but smooth rotational TQ.
No seal, and the crank ought rotate with 1-finger tugging a counterweight.

Each Slug add TQ due to CYl walls, but you ought check Rodplay (and rock) on Crank before install to avoid surprises. Yea i've seen 35'Lb to low 20s due to stock stack vs Chevy stack. So you will kinda know the rotational TQ depending on the Ring stack and CYL hone money you decided on.

Finally, that's about it.


Last edited by Half-Inch Stud; 02-18-2024 at 02:34 PM.
  #4  
Old 02-18-2024, 02:37 PM
grandam1979 grandam1979 is online now
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ohio, Findlay
Posts: 1,437
Default

With just the crank it had 2-3ftlbs of resistance with rods and pistons it 25-30 with classic race rings in it so I’m happy with that.

The Following User Says Thank You to grandam1979 For This Useful Post:
  #5  
Old 02-18-2024, 03:00 PM
steve25's Avatar
steve25 steve25 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Westchester NY
Posts: 14,752
Default

Yes your fine with that especially if your using 5/64” rings.

__________________
Wernher Von Braun warned before his retirement from NASA back in 1972, that the next world war would be against the ETs!
And he was not talking about 1/8 or 1/4 mile ETs!

1) 1940s 100% silver 4 cup tea server set.

Two dry rotted 14 x 10 Micky Thompson slicks.

1) un-mailed in gift coupon from a 1972 box of corn flakes.
Two pairs of brown leather flip flops, never seen more then 2 mph.

Education is what your left with once you forget things!
  #6  
Old 02-18-2024, 05:43 PM
mgarblik mgarblik is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 6,096
Default

Your numbers look fine to me as well. Using assembly lube vs just engine oil can add 5-10 ft. lbs rotating torque as well. I am talking about thicker liquid like Lucas , Torco, or Sealed power assembly lube. The viscosity is very high.

  #7  
Old 02-18-2024, 06:09 PM
mysticmissle's Avatar
mysticmissle mysticmissle is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: rhode island
Posts: 3,721
Default

Would rear main seal choice would have likley impact?i believe yes in my experience

__________________
1969 carousel red firebird 455, richmond 5 speed
1964 540 gto
1971 lemans sport convertible
1972 Maverick under slow construction
  #8  
Old 02-18-2024, 08:00 PM
mgarblik mgarblik is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 6,096
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mysticmissle View Post
Would rear main seal choice would have likley impact?i believe yes in my experience
Absolutely. A fresh rope seal adds allot of drag until it breaks in. I generally assemble, crank, pistons and rods, cam and timing chain. Then check rotational torque. If I am happy with it, I then remove the rear cap and pack the bottom half of the rope seal and install. But to be honest, I haven't used a rope seal in a Pontiac in 10 years or more. Too many good modern options to mess with that ancient technology nowdays. The viton seals, lubricated add little drag.

  #9  
Old 02-19-2024, 07:12 AM
mysticmissle's Avatar
mysticmissle mysticmissle is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: rhode island
Posts: 3,721
Default

You are using lip seal On factory and or Eagle serrated cranks w good success ?
Has anyone ever done a dyno test to isolate your the seal drag? Lot of work but I wonder what it would
Show

__________________
1969 carousel red firebird 455, richmond 5 speed
1964 540 gto
1971 lemans sport convertible
1972 Maverick under slow construction
  #10  
Old 02-19-2024, 09:47 AM
PAUL K's Avatar
PAUL K PAUL K is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sugar Grove IL USA
Posts: 6,353
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mysticmissle View Post
You are using lip seal On factory and or Eagle serrated cranks w good success ?
Has anyone ever done a dyno test to isolate your the seal drag? Lot of work but I wonder what it would
Show
I don't think there would be much difference. I remember packing the original GM seals and they almost locked up the motor once you torqued the cap. And I remember after those seals broke in the engine turned as if there was little drag.

H-O used to claim a 5 HP difference but I'm guessing that was a calculated number. Hard to find a Dyno back then that would read that accurate in a back to back test.

__________________
Go fast, see Elvis!
www.facebook.com/PaulKnippensMuscleMotors
The Following User Says Thank You to PAUL K For This Useful Post:
  #11  
Old 02-19-2024, 12:31 PM
mgarblik mgarblik is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 6,096
Default

I know I read somewhere but can't remember the source that a rope seal, once broken in has less drag than a rubber/viton seal. But that's certainly not the case when the rope is new. I have removed the pistons and rods from old Pontiac engines with rope seals and the crank can be turned easily with 2 fingers. Not scientific, but almost no drag you can feel. As far as the viton seals on serrated crankshafts. I personally don't like Eagle crankshafts so I have never used one in a Pontiac build. There have been many comments on the forum and other sites that some Eagle cranks have very aggressive serrations that could tear the viton seal or leak through the serrations. If you can easily catch a fingernail on the serrations, polishing this area with 280/320/400 cloth would be a minimal treatment IMO. Factory crankshafts I just polish in the normal way with a 400 grit, worn polishing belt and they seem to work just fine with the viton seals.

The Following User Says Thank You to mgarblik For This Useful Post:
  #12  
Old 02-21-2024, 01:42 PM
HWYSTR455's Avatar
HWYSTR455 HWYSTR455 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Manassas, VA
Posts: 14,746
Default

The newer graphite rope seals have very low drag, but of course, a certain amount is relevant to the installation.


.

__________________
.

1970 GTO Judge Tribute Pro-Tour Project 535 IA2
http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...d.php?t=760624
1971 Trans Am 463, 315cfm E-head Sniper XFlow EFI, TKO600 extreme, 9", GW suspension, Baer brakes, pro tour car
https://forums.maxperformanceinc.com...ght=procharger
Theme Song: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zKAS...ature=youtu.be
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:04 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017