| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Social Groups |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
See my post "Stroker engine finally finished and on the Road!"
http://forums.performanceyears.com/g...1&m=5231035101 These are pictures to go with that story and mycombo writeup. First shot is of the Butler Performance Stroker kit and other parts. (thanks to goatseeker for catching my poor spelling!)
__________________
"Never try to teach a pig to sing. It's a waste of time and it annoys the pig" |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
See my post "Stroker engine finally finished and on the Road!"
http://forums.performanceyears.com/g...1&m=5231035101 These are pictures to go with that story and mycombo writeup. First shot is of the Butler Performance Stroker kit and other parts. (thanks to goatseeker for catching my poor spelling!)
__________________
"Never try to teach a pig to sing. It's a waste of time and it annoys the pig" |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Here's the completed engine on the stand Picture out of sequence...sorry!) (Picture taken before valve cover spacers installed allowing use of 66 valve covers)
__________________
"Never try to teach a pig to sing. It's a waste of time and it annoys the pig" |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Last picture was out of order...This should have been next. Another shot of parts and my GTO
__________________
"Never try to teach a pig to sing. It's a waste of time and it annoys the pig" |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Stroker engine installed!!!
__________________
"Never try to teach a pig to sing. It's a waste of time and it annoys the pig" |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Here is the short Ross pistons and LONG Eagle Rods...
__________________
"Never try to teach a pig to sing. It's a waste of time and it annoys the pig" |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
That looks great. Goo dluck. ANy more specs on the motor ? Horsepower ?
Brad |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Have you checked the clearance under the valve covers? It doesn't appear that there are any spacers under there, and you will probably dent the '66 covers if you don't use them or at least thicker gaskets.
Looks great, BTW! |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thanks guys! No HP or Torque numbers as the engine was not dyno'ed. Jim Butler says it should be somewhere around 500 HP and 500 ft/lbs of torque at the flywheel. That's optimistic but it's what I'll tell the Ch*#y guys! I will never know now. May put it on a chassis dyno someday but not an engine dyno. Would have loved to do that but.. time and money always is a problem! The engine stand pictures were taken before the valve cover spacers were installed. They were put on before the engine was started the first time. They work well and allow me to use my original 66 valve covers. I like 66 covers better and it keeps it more stock looking... just don't look at the head numbers or the exhaust manifolds!!!
__________________
"Never try to teach a pig to sing. It's a waste of time and it annoys the pig" |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Jim,
That's looks SWEET What size is that brake booster you got. Anthony
__________________
I do it right cause' I do it twice. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thanks 66 GTO! I converted to front disk brakes and dual master cylinder a few years ago for safety reasons. I used the setup from Stainless Steel Brakes Corp as they were the only ones who carried a 14" conversion kit and I wanted to keep my Rallye Ones and I like the look of 14" tires on a 66 GTO. The brake system SSBC supplies uses 69 Camaro parts for the spindle assembly. Not sure about the booster. You think I would know since my wife has a 69 Camaro but I never looked! doh! I will check this weekend and see if they are the same.
__________________
"Never try to teach a pig to sing. It's a waste of time and it annoys the pig" |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Jim,
Very nice looking motor and '66 vert! I assume you used the stroker kit for a 400 block, correct? That is going to be a mean sleeper with the stock '66 valve covers. Don't worry about somebody seeing the head casting numbers, Chebby guys can't read anyway!! <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR> First shot is of the Mutler Performance Stroker kit <HR></BLOCKQUOTE> BTW, who is "Mutler"? Just jerkin' yer chain |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
That looks really sweet! Is that the new alm. tri intake?
__________________
CT Gross---66 GTO "Its never too late to have a happy childhood"! I told my dad I was going to stop raising hell, and he called me a quitter! |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
Look familiar? |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
thank you for the sweet pictures.. my friend is a chevy freak and wants me to dump my WT and slide in a chevy stroker... Pictures like this make my resolution stronger to stay poncho!!!
|
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Is the intake water neck aluminum?
Nice looking motor!
__________________
Skip Fix 1978 Trans Am original owner 10.99 @ 124 pump gas 455 E heads, NO Bird ever! 1981 Black SE Trans Am stockish 6X 400ci, turbo 301 on a stand 1965 GTO 4 barrel 3 speed project 2004 GTO Pulse Red stock motor computer tune [email protected] 1964 Impala SS 409/470ci 600 HP stroker project 1979 Camaro IAII Edelbrock head 500" 695 HP 10.33@132 3595lbs 1964 Corvette Coupe 327 4 speed |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thanks for the feedback. Here some answer's to questions:
1) to 66 GTO: The brake booster and master cylinder is from a 69 Camaro. Probably the same as a 69 Firebird. All available as new parts from many vendors. 2) to Goatseeker: It is a 389 kit not a 400 kit. Butler Performance and probably most others carry a 389 Stroker Kit. Jim Butler customizes it to your specific engine. Custom Ross pistons to meet your desired compression ratio at zero deck height based on what heads you use and their cc. I used 6X ported heads setup by KRE for 95 or 96 cc. So he sent flat top pistons setup for zero with my deck height of 10.215" after decking. This is why I recommend getting the Stroker Kit from a reputable vendor. Buying off eBay or the parts store, what Compression ratio will you get? Will the pistons be "in the hole"? etc. You don't know unless everything is designed for your specific application. Sorry for the long answer but I hope I can save someone some grief! Mutler? LOL... Good catch!!! Can you tell I'm excited about this engine??? Jim 3) to ctgross: Yes, it is the new aluminum intake. I looked everywhere and it was sold out. Then I tried doing searches and found Ames had some in stock even though they did not list it anywhere! They are now "out of stock". Chris at PY says more coming this Spring and asks that you put you order in now. It is a huge difference in weight when you are moving it around or trying to install! Looks great too! I left it bare aluminum just to be different... 4) to Skip Fix: No, the waterneck is cast iron. Bead blasted and painted with clear to match the aluminum intake. The aluminum waterneck that was available with the aluminum intake was a 65 version. Not sure when 66 style will be available.
__________________
"Never try to teach a pig to sing. It's a waste of time and it annoys the pig" |
| Reply |
|
|