FAQ |
Members List |
Social Groups |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
The Body Shop TECH General questions that don't fit in any other forum |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
What are the symptoms of improperly shimmed core support?
Hi,
I'm working on alignment of my panels before I disassemble for final bodywork and paint, and need some advice on shimming the core support. I've seen drawings that show there were shims that could be added, but I am not familiar with how you would determine when they are needed. I currently do not have any shims between the core support and frame, and the hood latch and bumpers have not been installed yet. I am using new reproduction hood, fenders and core support, and have everything except the inner fenders and front valance on so far. I am getting about as close as I think I can get with these parts, but one thing I am seeing that needs addressing is the front driver's side of the hood sticks up higher than the passenger side at the nosecone. What I mean, is that when I close the hood, the passenger side is flush with the nosecone and fender but the drivers side sits about 3/8" high. I can push it down with my thumb and then it aligns OK along the length of the fender, but it is seems like the hood is either twisted or the front of the DS fender is a bit low compared to the PS fender. I am thinking that adding a few shims to the DS of the core support would raise the DS fender and improve the fit of the hood, but then I don't understand why shims would only be needed on one side of the core support and not the other. Any advice? Thanks!
__________________
Michael 1970 Oshawa built 1 option Judge. 24 year restoration/upgrade project finally finished! 1979 Trans Am - low-buck drag car project for when I retire |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
There is a lot of info I could throw at you about panel alignment, but let me ask a couple of questions.
Are the fender bottoms hitting the rocker panel ends? If you lay a straight edge along the rocker and lower fender, are there gaps indicating the bottom of the fender is twisted? Is the hood latched installed? If so, does the opposite hood corner raise when you push down on the driver's side? |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
See my answers above, and your help is appreciated. Thanks!
__________________
Michael 1970 Oshawa built 1 option Judge. 24 year restoration/upgrade project finally finished! 1979 Trans Am - low-buck drag car project for when I retire |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
I'm thinking about this some more...the rad support is mounted below the frame so I think adding shims would pull it down, would it not?
__________________
Michael 1970 Oshawa built 1 option Judge. 24 year restoration/upgrade project finally finished! 1979 Trans Am - low-buck drag car project for when I retire |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Dozens of variables can be had here. The obvious was already touched upon and that is how the bottom of the fenders fit. If the front edge of the bottom of the fender kicks out that could be an indication that the core support needs to be shimmed up, but not always a telltale sign. Somethings shims were added to the upper front mounting point of the fender to correct the same issue. However, if you need to add a 1/4" of shims to the upper front of the fender (which will look hideous), that IMO calls for more shims at the base of the core support.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
You're using an aftermarket core support? Which brand?
My core support required a lot of work to fit right, which is why I'm curious. .
__________________
. 1970 GTO Judge Tribute Pro-Tour Project 535 IA2 http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...d.php?t=760624 1971 Trans Am 463, 315cfm E-head Sniper XFlow EFI, TKO600 extreme, 9", GW suspension, Baer brakes, pro tour car https://forums.maxperformanceinc.com...ght=procharger Theme Song: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zKAS...ature=youtu.be |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I know the bottom rail was not welded correctly and I spent many hours fixing that, so entirely possible the thing is not square or has a dimension that is wrong.
__________________
Michael 1970 Oshawa built 1 option Judge. 24 year restoration/upgrade project finally finished! 1979 Trans Am - low-buck drag car project for when I retire |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
That is correct. If you add a shim between the core support and the frame horn the front of the fender will go down. The other question I would ask is how tight is the core support to frame bolt on each side? Put a wrench on it, tighten/loosen it and watch how far your fender moves in relation to your nose. It is surprising how much it moves.
__________________
R68GTO 1969 Camaro COPO 427 "RAT'S NEST" |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Thanks, I will check that. I haven't torqued them to spec but thought they were pretty tight. I will also try to get some measurements to see if the height from the bottom of the the frame to the top surface of the support are the same on both sides. If not, then either support is off of perhaps on of the bushings has an issue.
__________________
Michael 1970 Oshawa built 1 option Judge. 24 year restoration/upgrade project finally finished! 1979 Trans Am - low-buck drag car project for when I retire |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
I checked the bolt for the bushings and they were tight. I measured distance from the bottom rail of the rad support to the top rail and the DS is 3/16" shorter, so this is making sense...except it means the support is out of whack.
For a quick test, I put a 1/8" shim under the front of the DS fender and after tightening everything back up, now the hood is evenly raised 1/8" above the nose rather than flush on PS and 3/8" high on DS. So I don't want to use shims on the top of the support, so I guess I'm going to have to shorten the sleeve in the bushing to move the rad support up? Repop parts are such a PITA at times.
__________________
Michael 1970 Oshawa built 1 option Judge. 24 year restoration/upgrade project finally finished! 1979 Trans Am - low-buck drag car project for when I retire |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
I cut a piece of tubing 1/8" shorter than the original bushing and used that to test, and after tightening everything up, hood fits great....except now my gaps are off so I have to go over them again.
At least I found something that makes sense and is fixable. If after I've got everything aligned and gapped this seems like the right fix, I will turn the original bushing down by 1/8" and will probably have to shorten the harder rubber insert on the bottom of the rail by a similar amount to keep the rubber "squish" to what it was. Right now the top side rubber is squeezed more than normal since the bushing is shorter.
__________________
Michael 1970 Oshawa built 1 option Judge. 24 year restoration/upgrade project finally finished! 1979 Trans Am - low-buck drag car project for when I retire |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
Wanted to provide a few follow up pics in case someone else is looking for help with a similar issue later on.
Also wanted to mention that my previous thought about trimming the bottom rubber insulator to match the shorter bushing would have been a mistake. The bottom insulator is a harder rubber than the top one, and it is this piece (along with the steel bushing or sleeve) that sets the height of the rad support. If I had shortened the steel bushing but trimmed the rubber insulator, the net result would be no change in location of the rad support as the effects would have cancelled each other. So I am going to leave the rubber pieces as is, a bit extra "squish" in the top insulator doesn't seem to hurt anything.
__________________
Michael 1970 Oshawa built 1 option Judge. 24 year restoration/upgrade project finally finished! 1979 Trans Am - low-buck drag car project for when I retire |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
That looks alot better....good info. Im sure I will be going through some of this myself this winter. Funny to watch some original GTO commercials and seeing how far off some of the alignments were.
__________________
72 lemans,455 e-head, UD 255/263 solid flat,3.73 gears,,,10" 4400 converter,, 6.68 at 101.8 mph,,1.44 60 ft.2007 (cam 271/278 roller)9"CC.4.11gear 6.41 at 106.32 mph 1.42 60 ft.(2009) SOLD,SOLD 1970 GTO 455 4 speed #matching,, 3.31 posi.Stock manifolds. # 64 heads.A factory mint tuquoise ,69' judge stripe car. 8.64 @ 87.3 mph on slippery street tires.Bad 2.25 60ft.Owned since 86' |
Reply |
|
|